Kingstone Companies Inc (KINS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kingstone Companies Inc (KINS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $8.71 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($350.83 Billion) in one year. See KINS cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kingstone Companies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kingstone Companies Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore KINS shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kingstone Companies Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kingstone Companies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see KINS company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | $75.86 Million | $330.69 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $57.95 Million | $308.21 Million | ▲ +453.1% |
| 2023 | -0.05x | $-11.33 Million | $212.71 Million | ▼ -1552.8% |
| 2022 | 0.00x | $-915.52K | $284.16 Million | ▼ -103.4% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $24.35 Million | $255.64 Million | ▲ +309.2% |
| 2020 | -0.05x | $-10.23 Million | $224.78 Million | ▼ -135.5% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $29.86 Million | $232.98 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $22.30 Million | $178.09 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2017 | 0.18x | $28.05 Million | $159.97 Million | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $15.20 Million | $112.77 Million | ▼ -31.4% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $20.40 Million | $103.85 Million | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | $17.33 Million | $94.50 Million | ▲ +101.4% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $7.38 Million | $81.07 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $6.38 Million | $77.22 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $7.25 Million | $54.39 Million | ▲ +63.9% |
| 2010 | 0.08x | $3.72 Million | $45.74 Million | ▲ +186.7% |
| 2009 | 0.03x | $1.20 Million | $42.26 Million | ▲ +115.7% |
| 2008 | -0.18x | $-752.64K | $4.16 Million | ▼ -725.2% |
| 2007 | -0.02x | $-374.38K | $17.09 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2006 | -0.02x | $-315.61K | $19.41 Million | ▼ -158.9% |
| 2005 | 0.03x | $477.18K | $17.29 Million | ▲ +188.4% |
| 2004 | -0.03x | $-721.50K | $23.11 Million | ▼ -109.7% |
| 2003 | 0.32x | $7.08 Million | $21.87 Million | ▲ +77.3% |
| 2002 | 0.18x | $335.90K | $1.84 Million | ▲ +122.2% |
| 2001 | -0.82x | $-1.20 Million | $1.46 Million | ▼ -1176.8% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $230.51K | $3.02 Million | ▲ +3027.1% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $-6.56K | $2.51 Million | ▲ +99.5% |
| 1998 | -0.51x | $-180.86K | $354.91K | ▼ -341.5% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $64.04K | $303.55K | ▲ +156.3% |
| 1996 | -0.38x | $-104.93K | $279.80K | ▼ -174.2% |
| 1995 | 0.51x | $150.19K | $297.26K | — |