Kingstone Companies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kingstone Companies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Kingstone Companies Inc (KINS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $28.75 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($348.77 Billion) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Kingstone Companies Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Kingstone Companies Inc (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Kingstone Companies Inc from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Kingstone Companies Inc across 31 annual periods. Check Kingstone Companies Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Kingstone Companies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Kingstone Companies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kingstone Companies Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see KINS operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | $75.86 Million | $330.69 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $57.95 Million | $308.21 Million | ▲ +453.1% |
| 2023 | -0.05x | $-11.33 Million | $212.71 Million | ▼ -1552.8% |
| 2022 | 0.00x | $-915.52K | $284.16 Million | ▼ -103.4% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $24.35 Million | $255.64 Million | ▲ +309.2% |
| 2020 | -0.05x | $-10.23 Million | $224.78 Million | ▼ -135.5% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $29.86 Million | $232.98 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $22.30 Million | $178.09 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2017 | 0.18x | $28.05 Million | $159.97 Million | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $15.20 Million | $112.77 Million | ▼ -31.4% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $20.40 Million | $103.85 Million | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | $17.33 Million | $94.50 Million | ▲ +101.4% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $7.38 Million | $81.07 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $6.38 Million | $77.22 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $7.25 Million | $54.39 Million | ▲ +63.9% |
| 2010 | 0.08x | $3.72 Million | $45.74 Million | ▲ +186.7% |
| 2009 | 0.03x | $1.20 Million | $42.26 Million | ▲ +115.7% |
| 2008 | -0.18x | $-752.64K | $4.16 Million | ▼ -725.2% |
| 2007 | -0.02x | $-374.38K | $17.09 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2006 | -0.02x | $-315.61K | $19.41 Million | ▼ -158.9% |
| 2005 | 0.03x | $477.18K | $17.29 Million | ▲ +188.4% |
| 2004 | -0.03x | $-721.50K | $23.11 Million | ▼ -109.7% |
| 2003 | 0.32x | $7.08 Million | $21.87 Million | ▲ +77.3% |
| 2002 | 0.18x | $335.90K | $1.84 Million | ▲ +122.2% |
| 2001 | -0.82x | $-1.20 Million | $1.46 Million | ▼ -1176.8% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $230.51K | $3.02 Million | ▲ +3027.1% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $-6.56K | $2.51 Million | ▲ +99.5% |
| 1998 | -0.51x | $-180.86K | $354.91K | ▼ -341.5% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $64.04K | $303.55K | ▲ +156.3% |
| 1996 | -0.38x | $-104.93K | $279.80K | ▼ -174.2% |
| 1995 | 0.51x | $150.19K | $297.26K | — |