Repro Med Systems Inc (KRMD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Repro Med Systems Inc (KRMD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $14.66K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($11.67 Million) in one year. Check Repro Med Systems Inc investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Repro Med Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Repro Med Systems Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore Repro Med Systems Inc total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Repro Med Systems Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Repro Med Systems Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Repro Med Systems Inc (KRMD) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $462.40K | $11.15 Million | ▲ +234.9% |
| 2024 | -0.03x | $-319.72K | $10.40 Million | ▲ +94.9% |
| 2023 | -0.60x | $-4.89 Million | $8.11 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2022 | -0.49x | $-5.40 Million | $11.01 Million | ▲ +45.5% |
| 2021 | -0.90x | $-4.32 Million | $4.79 Million | ▼ -356.2% |
| 2020 | -0.20x | $-743.32K | $3.76 Million | ▼ -263.1% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $320.62K | $2.65 Million | ▼ -87.0% |
| 2018 | 0.93x | $1.48 Million | $1.58 Million | ▲ +67.2% |
| 2017 | 0.56x | $899.91K | $1.61 Million | ▲ +351.7% |
| 2016 | -0.22x | $-331.62K | $1.49 Million | ▼ -116.5% |
| 2015 | 1.35x | $1.91 Million | $1.42 Million | ▲ +64.2% |
| 2014 | 0.82x | $826.10K | $1.01 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2013 | 0.94x | $954.39K | $1.02 Million | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2012 | 0.64x | $784.79K | $1.24 Million | ▲ +42.1% |
| 2011 | 0.45x | $560.60K | $1.25 Million | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2010 | 1.08x | $1.03 Million | $956.63K | ▲ +281.6% |
| 2009 | 0.28x | $382.30K | $1.36 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2008 | 0.33x | $528.18K | $1.61 Million | ▲ +398.6% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $117.61K | $1.78 Million | ▲ +237.6% |
| 2006 | -0.05x | $-85.59K | $1.78 Million | ▲ +48.6% |
| 2005 | -0.09x | $-138.75K | $1.49 Million | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2004 | -0.14x | $-191.69K | $1.39 Million | ▼ -436.5% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-34.92K | $1.36 Million | ▼ -246.9% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $18.32K | $1.05 Million | ▲ +139.6% |
| 2001 | -0.04x | $-46.87K | $1.06 Million | ▲ +75.8% |
| 2000 | -0.18x | $-136.56K | $749.03K | ▼ -273.7% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $96.22K | $916.66K | ▲ +269.9% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | $-110.00K | $1.78 Million | ▲ +59.6% |
| 1997 | -0.15x | $-330.00K | $2.16 Million | ▼ -178.4% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | $230.00K | $1.18 Million | — |