Repro Med Systems Inc (KRMD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Repro Med Systems Inc (KRMD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $216.11K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.91 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Repro Med Systems Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Repro Med Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Repro Med Systems Inc across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Repro Med Systems Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Repro Med Systems Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Repro Med Systems Inc. Check Repro Med Systems Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $462.40K | $11.15 Million | ▲ +234.9% |
| 2024 | -0.03x | $-319.72K | $10.40 Million | ▲ +94.9% |
| 2023 | -0.60x | $-4.89 Million | $8.11 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2022 | -0.49x | $-5.40 Million | $11.01 Million | ▲ +45.5% |
| 2021 | -0.90x | $-4.32 Million | $4.79 Million | ▼ -356.2% |
| 2020 | -0.20x | $-743.32K | $3.76 Million | ▼ -263.1% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $320.62K | $2.65 Million | ▼ -87.0% |
| 2018 | 0.93x | $1.48 Million | $1.58 Million | ▲ +67.2% |
| 2017 | 0.56x | $899.91K | $1.61 Million | ▲ +351.7% |
| 2016 | -0.22x | $-331.62K | $1.49 Million | ▼ -116.5% |
| 2015 | 1.35x | $1.91 Million | $1.42 Million | ▲ +64.2% |
| 2014 | 0.82x | $826.10K | $1.01 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2013 | 0.94x | $954.39K | $1.02 Million | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2012 | 0.64x | $784.79K | $1.24 Million | ▲ +42.1% |
| 2011 | 0.45x | $560.60K | $1.25 Million | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2010 | 1.08x | $1.03 Million | $956.63K | ▲ +281.6% |
| 2009 | 0.28x | $382.30K | $1.36 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2008 | 0.33x | $528.18K | $1.61 Million | ▲ +398.6% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $117.61K | $1.78 Million | ▲ +237.6% |
| 2006 | -0.05x | $-85.59K | $1.78 Million | ▲ +48.6% |
| 2005 | -0.09x | $-138.75K | $1.49 Million | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2004 | -0.14x | $-191.69K | $1.39 Million | ▼ -436.5% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-34.92K | $1.36 Million | ▼ -246.9% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $18.32K | $1.05 Million | ▲ +139.6% |
| 2001 | -0.04x | $-46.87K | $1.06 Million | ▲ +75.8% |
| 2000 | -0.18x | $-136.56K | $749.03K | ▼ -273.7% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $96.22K | $916.66K | ▲ +269.9% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | $-110.00K | $1.78 Million | ▲ +59.6% |
| 1997 | -0.15x | $-330.00K | $2.16 Million | ▼ -178.4% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | $230.00K | $1.18 Million | — |