Repro Med Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Repro Med Systems Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Repro Med Systems Inc (KRMD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $216.11K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.91 Million) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Repro Med Systems Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Repro Med Systems Inc (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Repro Med Systems Inc from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Repro Med Systems Inc across 30 annual periods. Check Repro Med Systems Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Repro Med Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Repro Med Systems Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Repro Med Systems Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Repro Med Systems Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $462.40K | $11.15 Million | ▲ +234.9% |
| 2024 | -0.03x | $-319.72K | $10.40 Million | ▲ +94.9% |
| 2023 | -0.60x | $-4.89 Million | $8.11 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2022 | -0.49x | $-5.40 Million | $11.01 Million | ▲ +45.5% |
| 2021 | -0.90x | $-4.32 Million | $4.79 Million | ▼ -356.2% |
| 2020 | -0.20x | $-743.32K | $3.76 Million | ▼ -263.1% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $320.62K | $2.65 Million | ▼ -87.0% |
| 2018 | 0.93x | $1.48 Million | $1.58 Million | ▲ +67.2% |
| 2017 | 0.56x | $899.91K | $1.61 Million | ▲ +351.7% |
| 2016 | -0.22x | $-331.62K | $1.49 Million | ▼ -116.5% |
| 2015 | 1.35x | $1.91 Million | $1.42 Million | ▲ +64.2% |
| 2014 | 0.82x | $826.10K | $1.01 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2013 | 0.94x | $954.39K | $1.02 Million | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2012 | 0.64x | $784.79K | $1.24 Million | ▲ +42.1% |
| 2011 | 0.45x | $560.60K | $1.25 Million | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2010 | 1.08x | $1.03 Million | $956.63K | ▲ +281.6% |
| 2009 | 0.28x | $382.30K | $1.36 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2008 | 0.33x | $528.18K | $1.61 Million | ▲ +398.6% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $117.61K | $1.78 Million | ▲ +237.6% |
| 2006 | -0.05x | $-85.59K | $1.78 Million | ▲ +48.6% |
| 2005 | -0.09x | $-138.75K | $1.49 Million | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2004 | -0.14x | $-191.69K | $1.39 Million | ▼ -436.5% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-34.92K | $1.36 Million | ▼ -246.9% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $18.32K | $1.05 Million | ▲ +139.6% |
| 2001 | -0.04x | $-46.87K | $1.06 Million | ▲ +75.8% |
| 2000 | -0.18x | $-136.56K | $749.03K | ▼ -273.7% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $96.22K | $916.66K | ▲ +269.9% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | $-110.00K | $1.78 Million | ▲ +59.6% |
| 1997 | -0.15x | $-330.00K | $2.16 Million | ▼ -178.4% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | $230.00K | $1.18 Million | — |