Repro Med Systems Inc (KRMD) — Financial Flexibility Index
Repro Med Systems Inc (KRMD) has a Financial Flexibility Index of 0.01x as of March 2026. Free cash flow of $60.83K (operating CF $14.66K minus capex $46.16K) represents 0% of total liabilities ($11.67 Million). Also explore Repro Med Systems Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Financial Flexibility Index
Free Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Capital Expenditures
Repro Med Systems Inc Financial Flexibility Index (1996–2025)
Historical Financial Flexibility Index trend for Repro Med Systems Inc across 30 annual periods. Check asset allocation strategy of Repro Med Systems Inc to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Annual Financial Flexibility Index for Repro Med Systems Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year free cash flow to debt coverage for Repro Med Systems Inc. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see market cap of Repro Med Systems Inc.
| Year | Flexibility Index | Free Cash Flow (USD) | Operating CF | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | $1.39 Million | $462.40K | $11.15 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $977.71K | $-319.72K | $10.40 Million | ▲ +118.7% |
| 2023 | -0.50x | $-4.08 Million | $-4.89 Million | $8.11 Million | ▼ -112.7% |
| 2022 | -0.24x | $-2.60 Million | $-5.40 Million | $11.01 Million | ▲ +71.3% |
| 2021 | -0.82x | $-3.94 Million | $-4.32 Million | $4.79 Million | ▼ -1074.3% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $317.83K | $-743.32K | $3.76 Million | ▼ -70.0% |
| 2019 | 0.28x | $746.16K | $320.62K | $2.65 Million | ▼ -77.2% |
| 2018 | 1.24x | $1.96 Million | $1.48 Million | $1.58 Million | ▲ +78.3% |
| 2017 | 0.69x | $1.12 Million | $899.91K | $1.61 Million | ▲ +1141.8% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $83.52K | $-331.62K | $1.49 Million | ▼ -96.2% |
| 2015 | 1.49x | $2.12 Million | $1.91 Million | $1.42 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2014 | 1.56x | $1.57 Million | $826.10K | $1.01 Million | ▲ +35.3% |
| 2013 | 1.15x | $1.17 Million | $954.39K | $1.02 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2012 | 1.09x | $1.35 Million | $784.79K | $1.24 Million | ▲ +72.1% |
| 2011 | 0.64x | $796.84K | $560.60K | $1.25 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2010 | 1.29x | $1.23 Million | $1.03 Million | $956.63K | ▲ +297.8% |
| 2009 | 0.32x | $438.46K | $382.30K | $1.36 Million | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2008 | 0.37x | $592.15K | $528.18K | $1.61 Million | ▲ +301.2% |
| 2007 | 0.09x | $163.85K | $117.61K | $1.78 Million | ▲ +333.0% |
| 2006 | -0.04x | $-70.40K | $-85.59K | $1.78 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2005 | -0.09x | $-129.50K | $-138.75K | $1.49 Million | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2004 | -0.10x | $-136.52K | $-191.69K | $1.39 Million | ▼ -619.5% |
| 2003 | -0.01x | $-18.55K | $-34.92K | $1.36 Million | ▼ -134.2% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | $41.79K | $18.32K | $1.05 Million | ▲ +24.2% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | $34.06K | $-46.87K | $1.06 Million | ▲ +137.8% |
| 2000 | -0.08x | $-63.50K | $-136.56K | $749.03K | ▼ -128.4% |
| 1999 | 0.30x | $273.70K | $96.22K | $916.66K | ▲ +985.8% |
| 1998 | -0.03x | $-60.00K | $-110.00K | $1.78 Million | ▲ +19.1% |
| 1997 | -0.04x | $-90.00K | $-330.00K | $2.16 Million | ▼ -103.1% |
| 1996 | 1.36x | $1.61 Million | $230.00K | $1.18 Million | — |