Repro Med Systems Inc (KRMD) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Repro Med Systems Inc (KRMD) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 95.8% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($711.21K) from net assets ($16.92 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Repro Med Systems Inc (KRMD) liquidity to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Repro Med Systems Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1996–2025)
This chart shows how Repro Med Systems Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 25 annual periods from 1996 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 95.8%, reflecting net assets of $16.92 Million with intangible assets of $711.21K USD. See KRMD days of operational coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Repro Med Systems Inc (1996–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Repro Med Systems Inc from 1996 to 2025, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Repro Med Systems Inc (KRMD) total market value.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 96.0% | $17.05 Million | $684.84K | $28.20 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2024 | 95.7% | $16.81 Million | $730.28K | $27.22 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2023 | 96.3% | $20.35 Million | $754.36K | $28.46 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2022 | 97.5% | $31.33 Million | $787.18K | $42.33 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2021 | 97.8% | $36.50 Million | $808.81K | $41.29 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2020 | 97.7% | $36.16 Million | $843.59K | $39.92 Million | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 2019 | 92.8% | $11.24 Million | $807.13K | $13.88 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2018 | 92.9% | $8.96 Million | $632.16K | $10.55 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2017 | 93.7% | $7.67 Million | $483.82K | $9.28 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2016 | 93.6% | $6.68 Million | $426.94K | $8.17 Million | ▼ -3.3 pp |
| 2015 | 96.9% | $6.77 Million | $210.26K | $8.19 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2014 | 97.1% | $6.27 Million | $180.56K | $7.28 Million | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2013 | 99.2% | $5.19 Million | $43.30K | $6.21 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2012 | 99.5% | $4.36 Million | $22.91K | $5.59 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2011 | 99.3% | $3.55 Million | $24.51K | $4.81 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2010 | 98.5% | $2.13 Million | $31.28K | $3.08 Million | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2009 | 96.5% | $1.03 Million | $36.41K | $2.39 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2008 | 94.8% | $705.09K | $36.34K | $2.31 Million | ▲ +68.9 pp |
| 2002 | 25.9% | $61.19K | $45.33K | $1.11 Million | ▼ -74.1 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $337.38K | $0.00 | $1.40 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $694.45K | $0.00 | $1.44 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $657.91K | $0.00 | $1.57 Million | ▲ +5.6 pp |
| 1998 | 94.4% | $540.00K | $30.00K | $2.32 Million | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 1997 | 98.4% | $1.87 Million | $30.00K | $4.03 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 1996 | 98.6% | $2.17 Million | $30.00K | $3.35 Million | — |