Repro Med Systems Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Repro Med Systems Inc tangible net worth ratio. Repro Med Systems Inc (KRMD) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 90.8% as of June 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($1.66 Million) from net assets ($18.05 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check Repro Med Systems Inc (KRMD) strategic asset index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Repro Med Systems Inc (1996–2025)
Tangible net worth ratio of Repro Med Systems Inc from 1996 to 2025. This chart shows how Repro Med Systems Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 25 annual periods from 1996 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 90.8%, reflecting net assets of $18.05 Million with intangible assets of $1.66 Million USD. See KRMD working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Repro Med Systems Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Repro Med Systems Inc tangible net worth ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Repro Med Systems Inc from 1996 to 2025, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Repro Med Systems Inc stock valuation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 96.0% | $17.05 Million | $684.84K | $28.20 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2024 | 95.7% | $16.81 Million | $730.28K | $27.22 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2023 | 96.3% | $20.35 Million | $754.36K | $28.46 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2022 | 97.5% | $31.33 Million | $787.18K | $42.33 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2021 | 97.8% | $36.50 Million | $808.81K | $41.29 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2020 | 97.7% | $36.16 Million | $843.59K | $39.92 Million | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 2019 | 92.8% | $11.24 Million | $807.13K | $13.88 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2018 | 92.9% | $8.96 Million | $632.16K | $10.55 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2017 | 93.7% | $7.67 Million | $483.82K | $9.28 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2016 | 93.6% | $6.68 Million | $426.94K | $8.17 Million | ▼ -3.3 pp |
| 2015 | 96.9% | $6.77 Million | $210.26K | $8.19 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2014 | 97.1% | $6.27 Million | $180.56K | $7.28 Million | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2013 | 99.2% | $5.19 Million | $43.30K | $6.21 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2012 | 99.5% | $4.36 Million | $22.91K | $5.59 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2011 | 99.3% | $3.55 Million | $24.51K | $4.81 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2010 | 98.5% | $2.13 Million | $31.28K | $3.08 Million | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2009 | 96.5% | $1.03 Million | $36.41K | $2.39 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2008 | 94.8% | $705.09K | $36.34K | $2.31 Million | ▲ +68.9 pp |
| 2002 | 25.9% | $61.19K | $45.33K | $1.11 Million | ▼ -74.1 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $337.38K | $0.00 | $1.40 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $694.45K | $0.00 | $1.44 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $657.91K | $0.00 | $1.57 Million | ▲ +5.6 pp |
| 1998 | 94.4% | $540.00K | $30.00K | $2.32 Million | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 1997 | 98.4% | $1.87 Million | $30.00K | $4.03 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 1996 | 98.6% | $2.17 Million | $30.00K | $3.35 Million | — |