Mattel Inc (MAT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mattel Inc (MAT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-22.94 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.22 Billion) in one year. See how financially flexible is Mattel Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mattel Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mattel Inc across 37 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Mattel Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mattel Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mattel Inc. Check Mattel Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | $593.25 Million | $4.41 Billion | ▼ -28.0% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $800.57 Million | $4.28 Billion | ▼ -7.8% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | $869.79 Million | $4.29 Billion | ▲ +88.8% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $442.84 Million | $4.12 Billion | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $485.46 Million | $4.83 Billion | ▲ +73.4% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $285.70 Million | $4.92 Billion | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $168.44 Million | $4.83 Billion | ▲ +690.3% |
| 2018 | -0.01x | $-27.00 Million | $4.57 Billion | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2017 | -0.01x | $-28.00 Million | $4.98 Billion | ▼ -103.9% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $590.00 Million | $4.09 Billion | ▼ -23.0% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $735.00 Million | $3.92 Billion | ▼ -20.4% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $889.00 Million | $3.77 Billion | ▲ +7.6% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | $698.00 Million | $3.19 Billion | ▼ -40.6% |
| 2012 | 0.37x | $1.28 Billion | $3.46 Billion | ▲ +69.8% |
| 2011 | 0.22x | $665.00 Million | $3.06 Billion | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2010 | 0.19x | $527.97 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▼ -54.9% |
| 2009 | 0.42x | $945.04 Million | $2.25 Billion | ▲ +146.5% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | $436.00 Million | $2.56 Billion | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2007 | 0.22x | $560.53 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▼ -35.4% |
| 2006 | 0.35x | $875.95 Million | $2.52 Billion | ▲ +68.9% |
| 2005 | 0.21x | $466.68 Million | $2.27 Billion | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2004 | 0.24x | $570.37 Million | $2.37 Billion | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2003 | 0.26x | $604.80 Million | $2.29 Billion | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2002 | 0.48x | $1.20 Billion | $2.48 Billion | ▲ +79.1% |
| 2001 | 0.27x | $756.25 Million | $2.80 Billion | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | $555.09 Million | $2.91 Billion | ▲ +929.9% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $58.60 Million | $3.16 Billion | ▼ -91.7% |
| 1998 | 0.22x | $547.50 Million | $2.44 Billion | ▼ -7.8% |
| 1997 | 0.24x | $481.90 Million | $1.98 Billion | ▼ -31.8% |
| 1996 | 0.36x | $515.20 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▲ +24.8% |
| 1995 | 0.29x | $405.50 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▲ +14.2% |
| 1994 | 0.25x | $343.40 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▼ -2.5% |
| 1993 | 0.26x | $303.30 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +43.7% |
| 1992 | 0.18x | $131.10 Million | $734.30 Million | ▼ -43.6% |
| 1991 | 0.32x | $197.10 Million | $622.40 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 1990 | 0.29x | $156.00 Million | $539.30 Million | ▼ -20.1% |
| 1989 | 0.36x | $200.50 Million | $554.10 Million | — |