NetEase Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
NetEase Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. NetEase Inc (NTES) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.16x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $9.99 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($60.67 Billion) in one year. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of NetEase Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of NetEase Inc (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of NetEase Inc from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for NetEase Inc across 27 annual periods. Check earnings quality score of NetEase Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
NetEase Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
NetEase Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for NetEase Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see NetEase Inc (NTES) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.88x | $49.36 Billion | $56.35 Billion | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2024 | 0.74x | $39.68 Billion | $53.50 Billion | ▲ +21.4% |
| 2023 | 0.61x | $35.33 Billion | $57.84 Billion | ▲ +40.8% |
| 2022 | 0.43x | $27.71 Billion | $63.89 Billion | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2021 | 0.46x | $24.93 Billion | $54.37 Billion | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2020 | 0.42x | $24.89 Billion | $58.88 Billion | ▲ +21.6% |
| 2019 | 0.35x | $17.22 Billion | $49.53 Billion | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2018 | 0.33x | $13.42 Billion | $40.94 Billion | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2017 | 0.48x | $11.89 Billion | $24.60 Billion | ▼ -38.9% |
| 2016 | 0.79x | $15.49 Billion | $19.57 Billion | ▲ +16.0% |
| 2015 | 0.68x | $8.08 Billion | $11.83 Billion | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2014 | 0.85x | $5.86 Billion | $6.86 Billion | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2013 | 1.20x | $5.24 Billion | $4.38 Billion | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2012 | 1.15x | $4.22 Billion | $3.68 Billion | ▼ -33.8% |
| 2011 | 1.74x | $4.07 Billion | $2.35 Billion | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2010 | 1.52x | $2.09 Billion | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1.52x | $2.09 Billion | $1.38 Billion | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2008 | 2.43x | $2.02 Billion | $829.04 Million | ▲ +127.0% |
| 2007 | 1.07x | $1.38 Billion | $1.29 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2006 | 1.09x | $1.60 Billion | $1.47 Billion | ▲ +21.4% |
| 2005 | 0.90x | $1.10 Billion | $1.23 Billion | ▲ +59.9% |
| 2004 | 0.56x | $614.15 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +35.2% |
| 2003 | 0.41x | $375.00 Million | $905.83 Million | ▼ -86.2% |
| 2002 | 3.00x | $115.87 Million | $38.65 Million | ▲ +293.4% |
| 2001 | -1.55x | $-185.72 Million | $119.78 Million | ▼ -52.0% |
| 2000 | -1.02x | $-156.48 Million | $153.37 Million | ▲ +50.2% |
| 1999 | -2.05x | $-15.68 Million | $7.66 Million | — |