Pure Cycle Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Pure Cycle Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.23x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($17.94 Million) in one year. Check Pure Cycle Corporation cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Pure Cycle Corporation (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Pure Cycle Corporation from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Pure Cycle Corporation across 31 annual periods. Check PCYO cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Pure Cycle Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Pure Cycle Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pure Cycle Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Pure Cycle Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.67x | $13.16 Million | $19.54 Million | ▲ +437.6% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | $2.21 Million | $17.65 Million | ▲ +180.3% |
| 2023 | -0.16x | $-2.34 Million | $14.98 Million | ▼ -114.5% |
| 2022 | 1.08x | $17.45 Million | $16.23 Million | ▲ +349.2% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | $3.46 Million | $14.44 Million | ▼ -91.1% |
| 2020 | 2.68x | $20.72 Million | $7.72 Million | ▲ +583.7% |
| 2019 | 0.39x | $3.53 Million | $8.99 Million | ▲ +199788.5% |
| 2018 | 0.00x | $482.00 | $2.45 Million | ▲ +100.0% |
| 2017 | -0.46x | $-1.05 Million | $2.28 Million | ▼ -220.8% |
| 2016 | -0.14x | $-270.73K | $1.88 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2015 | -0.33x | $-974.07K | $2.98 Million | ▼ -10946.3% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | $51.74K | $17.14 Million | ▲ +112.2% |
| 2013 | -0.02x | $-1.76 Million | $70.85 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2012 | -0.02x | $-1.89 Million | $81.46 Million | ▼ -155.8% |
| 2011 | -0.01x | $-623.25K | $68.83 Million | ▲ +63.5% |
| 2010 | -0.02x | $-1.58 Million | $63.92 Million | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2009 | -0.02x | $-1.48 Million | $60.32 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2008 | -0.02x | $-1.29 Million | $56.73 Million | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2007 | -0.04x | $-2.37 Million | $54.05 Million | ▼ -409.9% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | $-767.59K | $89.23 Million | ▲ +88.8% |
| 2005 | -0.08x | $-818.26K | $10.69 Million | ▼ -82.6% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | $-515.64K | $12.30 Million | ▼ -484.1% |
| 2003 | -0.01x | $-115.04K | $16.03 Million | ▼ -396.8% |
| 2002 | 0.00x | $-22.86K | $15.83 Million | ▲ +96.5% |
| 2001 | -0.04x | $-641.11K | $15.63 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2000 | -0.03x | $-137.69K | $5.21 Million | ▼ -155.0% |
| 1999 | 0.05x | $778.82K | $16.22 Million | ▲ +382.8% |
| 1998 | -0.02x | $-255.57K | $15.05 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 1997 | -0.01x | $-172.83K | $14.81 Million | ▲ +47.9% |
| 1996 | -0.02x | $-314.28K | $14.02 Million | ▲ +71.8% |
| 1995 | -0.08x | $-258.56K | $3.25 Million | — |