Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.23x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($17.94 Million) in one year. See PCYO cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Pure Cycle Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Pure Cycle Corporation across 31 annual periods. Also explore PCYO shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Pure Cycle Corporation (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pure Cycle Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Pure Cycle Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.67x | $13.16 Million | $19.54 Million | ▲ +437.6% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | $2.21 Million | $17.65 Million | ▲ +180.3% |
| 2023 | -0.16x | $-2.34 Million | $14.98 Million | ▼ -114.5% |
| 2022 | 1.08x | $17.45 Million | $16.23 Million | ▲ +349.2% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | $3.46 Million | $14.44 Million | ▼ -91.1% |
| 2020 | 2.68x | $20.72 Million | $7.72 Million | ▲ +583.7% |
| 2019 | 0.39x | $3.53 Million | $8.99 Million | ▲ +199788.5% |
| 2018 | 0.00x | $482.00 | $2.45 Million | ▲ +100.0% |
| 2017 | -0.46x | $-1.05 Million | $2.28 Million | ▼ -220.8% |
| 2016 | -0.14x | $-270.73K | $1.88 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2015 | -0.33x | $-974.07K | $2.98 Million | ▼ -10946.3% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | $51.74K | $17.14 Million | ▲ +112.2% |
| 2013 | -0.02x | $-1.76 Million | $70.85 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2012 | -0.02x | $-1.89 Million | $81.46 Million | ▼ -155.8% |
| 2011 | -0.01x | $-623.25K | $68.83 Million | ▲ +63.5% |
| 2010 | -0.02x | $-1.58 Million | $63.92 Million | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2009 | -0.02x | $-1.48 Million | $60.32 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2008 | -0.02x | $-1.29 Million | $56.73 Million | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2007 | -0.04x | $-2.37 Million | $54.05 Million | ▼ -409.9% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | $-767.59K | $89.23 Million | ▲ +88.8% |
| 2005 | -0.08x | $-818.26K | $10.69 Million | ▼ -82.6% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | $-515.64K | $12.30 Million | ▼ -484.1% |
| 2003 | -0.01x | $-115.04K | $16.03 Million | ▼ -396.8% |
| 2002 | 0.00x | $-22.86K | $15.83 Million | ▲ +96.5% |
| 2001 | -0.04x | $-641.11K | $15.63 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2000 | -0.03x | $-137.69K | $5.21 Million | ▼ -155.0% |
| 1999 | 0.05x | $778.82K | $16.22 Million | ▲ +382.8% |
| 1998 | -0.02x | $-255.57K | $15.05 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 1997 | -0.01x | $-172.83K | $14.81 Million | ▲ +47.9% |
| 1996 | -0.02x | $-314.28K | $14.02 Million | ▲ +71.8% |
| 1995 | -0.08x | $-258.56K | $3.25 Million | — |