Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.23x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($17.94 Million) in one year. Explore Pure Cycle Corporation long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Pure Cycle Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Pure Cycle Corporation across 31 annual periods. Also explore Pure Cycle Corporation balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Pure Cycle Corporation (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pure Cycle Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see PCYO company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.67x | $13.16 Million | $19.54 Million | ▲ +437.6% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | $2.21 Million | $17.65 Million | ▲ +180.3% |
| 2023 | -0.16x | $-2.34 Million | $14.98 Million | ▼ -114.5% |
| 2022 | 1.08x | $17.45 Million | $16.23 Million | ▲ +349.2% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | $3.46 Million | $14.44 Million | ▼ -91.1% |
| 2020 | 2.68x | $20.72 Million | $7.72 Million | ▲ +583.7% |
| 2019 | 0.39x | $3.53 Million | $8.99 Million | ▲ +199788.5% |
| 2018 | 0.00x | $482.00 | $2.45 Million | ▲ +100.0% |
| 2017 | -0.46x | $-1.05 Million | $2.28 Million | ▼ -220.8% |
| 2016 | -0.14x | $-270.73K | $1.88 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2015 | -0.33x | $-974.07K | $2.98 Million | ▼ -10946.3% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | $51.74K | $17.14 Million | ▲ +112.2% |
| 2013 | -0.02x | $-1.76 Million | $70.85 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2012 | -0.02x | $-1.89 Million | $81.46 Million | ▼ -155.8% |
| 2011 | -0.01x | $-623.25K | $68.83 Million | ▲ +63.5% |
| 2010 | -0.02x | $-1.58 Million | $63.92 Million | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2009 | -0.02x | $-1.48 Million | $60.32 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2008 | -0.02x | $-1.29 Million | $56.73 Million | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2007 | -0.04x | $-2.37 Million | $54.05 Million | ▼ -409.9% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | $-767.59K | $89.23 Million | ▲ +88.8% |
| 2005 | -0.08x | $-818.26K | $10.69 Million | ▼ -82.6% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | $-515.64K | $12.30 Million | ▼ -484.1% |
| 2003 | -0.01x | $-115.04K | $16.03 Million | ▼ -396.8% |
| 2002 | 0.00x | $-22.86K | $15.83 Million | ▲ +96.5% |
| 2001 | -0.04x | $-641.11K | $15.63 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2000 | -0.03x | $-137.69K | $5.21 Million | ▼ -155.0% |
| 1999 | 0.05x | $778.82K | $16.22 Million | ▲ +382.8% |
| 1998 | -0.02x | $-255.57K | $15.05 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 1997 | -0.01x | $-172.83K | $14.81 Million | ▲ +47.9% |
| 1996 | -0.02x | $-314.28K | $14.02 Million | ▲ +71.8% |
| 1995 | -0.08x | $-258.56K | $3.25 Million | — |