Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.23x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($17.94 Million) in one year. See Pure Cycle Corporation free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Pure Cycle Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Pure Cycle Corporation across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Pure Cycle Corporation generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Pure Cycle Corporation (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pure Cycle Corporation. Check Pure Cycle Corporation earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.67x | $13.16 Million | $19.54 Million | ▲ +437.6% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | $2.21 Million | $17.65 Million | ▲ +180.3% |
| 2023 | -0.16x | $-2.34 Million | $14.98 Million | ▼ -114.5% |
| 2022 | 1.08x | $17.45 Million | $16.23 Million | ▲ +349.2% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | $3.46 Million | $14.44 Million | ▼ -91.1% |
| 2020 | 2.68x | $20.72 Million | $7.72 Million | ▲ +583.7% |
| 2019 | 0.39x | $3.53 Million | $8.99 Million | ▲ +199788.5% |
| 2018 | 0.00x | $482.00 | $2.45 Million | ▲ +100.0% |
| 2017 | -0.46x | $-1.05 Million | $2.28 Million | ▼ -220.8% |
| 2016 | -0.14x | $-270.73K | $1.88 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2015 | -0.33x | $-974.07K | $2.98 Million | ▼ -10946.3% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | $51.74K | $17.14 Million | ▲ +112.2% |
| 2013 | -0.02x | $-1.76 Million | $70.85 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2012 | -0.02x | $-1.89 Million | $81.46 Million | ▼ -155.8% |
| 2011 | -0.01x | $-623.25K | $68.83 Million | ▲ +63.5% |
| 2010 | -0.02x | $-1.58 Million | $63.92 Million | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2009 | -0.02x | $-1.48 Million | $60.32 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2008 | -0.02x | $-1.29 Million | $56.73 Million | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2007 | -0.04x | $-2.37 Million | $54.05 Million | ▼ -409.9% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | $-767.59K | $89.23 Million | ▲ +88.8% |
| 2005 | -0.08x | $-818.26K | $10.69 Million | ▼ -82.6% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | $-515.64K | $12.30 Million | ▼ -484.1% |
| 2003 | -0.01x | $-115.04K | $16.03 Million | ▼ -396.8% |
| 2002 | 0.00x | $-22.86K | $15.83 Million | ▲ +96.5% |
| 2001 | -0.04x | $-641.11K | $15.63 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2000 | -0.03x | $-137.69K | $5.21 Million | ▼ -155.0% |
| 1999 | 0.05x | $778.82K | $16.22 Million | ▲ +382.8% |
| 1998 | -0.02x | $-255.57K | $15.05 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 1997 | -0.01x | $-172.83K | $14.81 Million | ▲ +47.9% |
| 1996 | -0.02x | $-314.28K | $14.02 Million | ▲ +71.8% |
| 1995 | -0.08x | $-258.56K | $3.25 Million | — |