PRA Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
PRA Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. PRA Group Inc (PRAA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-10.13 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.02 Billion) in one year. Check PRAA cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of PRA Group Inc (2000–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of PRA Group Inc from 2000 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for PRA Group Inc across 25 annual periods. Check PRAA cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
PRA Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2024)
PRA Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for PRA Group Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see PRAA cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.03x | $-94.59 Million | $3.74 Billion | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2023 | -0.03x | $-97.53 Million | $3.29 Billion | ▼ -497.1% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $21.59 Million | $2.89 Billion | ▼ -73.2% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $84.92 Million | $3.04 Billion | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $141.70 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2019 | 0.04x | $133.39 Million | $3.20 Billion | ▲ +43.7% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $80.87 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▲ +380.3% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $15.47 Million | $2.56 Billion | ▼ -93.4% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $205.90 Million | $2.25 Billion | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $203.00 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2014 | 0.14x | $267.90 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▼ -53.6% |
| 2013 | 0.31x | $225.13 Million | $731.76 Million | ▲ +35.9% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $131.41 Million | $580.53 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2011 | 0.36x | $173.03 Million | $475.63 Million | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2010 | 0.29x | $143.58 Million | $490.94 Million | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $85.28 Million | $458.95 Million | ▼ -15.0% |
| 2008 | 0.22x | $81.72 Million | $373.98 Million | ▼ -34.5% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | $80.36 Million | $241.03 Million | ▼ -74.2% |
| 2006 | 1.29x | $59.47 Million | $46.10 Million | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2005 | 1.10x | $57.85 Million | $52.45 Million | ▼ -46.8% |
| 2004 | 2.07x | $49.29 Million | $23.79 Million | ▼ -57.2% |
| 2003 | 4.84x | $35.08 Million | $7.25 Million | ▲ +70.3% |
| 2002 | 2.84x | $21.84 Million | $7.68 Million | ▲ +1184.9% |
| 2001 | 0.22x | $6.50 Million | $29.36 Million | ▼ -96.2% |
| 2000 | 5.79x | $3.08 Million | $532.00K | — |