Richardson Electronics Ltd (RELL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Richardson Electronics Ltd (RELL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.65 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($39.65 Million) in one year. See Richardson Electronics Ltd (RELL) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Richardson Electronics Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Richardson Electronics Ltd across 36 annual periods. Also explore Richardson Electronics Ltd net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Richardson Electronics Ltd (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Richardson Electronics Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Richardson Electronics Ltd.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.27x | $10.55 Million | $39.18 Million | ▲ +42.4% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $6.52 Million | $34.49 Million | ▲ +189.3% |
| 2023 | -0.21x | $-8.20 Million | $38.73 Million | ▼ -587.1% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $1.91 Million | $43.97 Million | ▲ +83.8% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $832.00K | $35.19 Million | ▼ -60.6% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $1.92 Million | $32.06 Million | ▲ +168.5% |
| 2019 | -0.09x | $-2.56 Million | $29.26 Million | ▼ -192.4% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $2.95 Million | $31.15 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $1.81 Million | $25.14 Million | ▲ +114.0% |
| 2016 | -0.51x | $-13.58 Million | $26.45 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2015 | -0.35x | $-9.78 Million | $28.34 Million | ▼ -314.7% |
| 2014 | 0.16x | $4.61 Million | $28.70 Million | ▼ -40.2% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | $8.62 Million | $32.08 Million | ▲ +117.2% |
| 2012 | -1.56x | $-48.72 Million | $31.21 Million | ▼ -6811.9% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $2.14 Million | $92.01 Million | ▼ -90.0% |
| 2010 | 0.23x | $24.33 Million | $104.95 Million | ▲ +172.2% |
| 2009 | 0.09x | $11.08 Million | $130.12 Million | ▼ -55.8% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $27.92 Million | $144.81 Million | ▲ +523.7% |
| 2007 | -0.05x | $-9.67 Million | $212.53 Million | ▼ -276.0% |
| 2006 | 0.03x | $5.46 Million | $211.06 Million | ▼ -58.0% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | $11.98 Million | $194.78 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | $11.98 Million | $194.78 Million | ▲ +42.2% |
| 2003 | 0.04x | $8.21 Million | $189.84 Million | ▼ -76.3% |
| 2002 | 0.18x | $34.21 Million | $187.23 Million | ▲ +298.0% |
| 2001 | -0.09x | $-19.56 Million | $211.97 Million | ▼ -483.4% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $4.11 Million | $170.93 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | $4.10 Million | $151.40 Million | ▼ -49.2% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $6.30 Million | $118.10 Million | ▲ +96.9% |
| 1997 | 0.03x | $3.60 Million | $132.90 Million | ▲ +140.3% |
| 1996 | -0.07x | $-7.90 Million | $117.40 Million | ▼ -17.8% |
| 1995 | -0.06x | $-6.70 Million | $117.30 Million | ▼ -215.1% |
| 1994 | -0.02x | $-2.30 Million | $126.90 Million | ▼ -139.1% |
| 1993 | 0.05x | $6.00 Million | $129.60 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 1992 | 0.08x | $10.60 Million | $129.80 Million | ▲ +249.9% |
| 1991 | -0.05x | $-7.70 Million | $141.30 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 1990 | -0.05x | $-6.70 Million | $125.90 Million | — |