Richardson Electronics Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Richardson Electronics Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Richardson Electronics Ltd (RELL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.10x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.77 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($38.32 Million) in one year. Check RELL cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Richardson Electronics Ltd (1990–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Richardson Electronics Ltd from 1990 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Richardson Electronics Ltd across 37 annual periods. Check RELL cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Richardson Electronics Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2026)
Richardson Electronics Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Richardson Electronics Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see RELL cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.02x | $762.00K | $38.32 Million | ▼ -92.6% |
| 2025 | 0.27x | $10.55 Million | $39.18 Million | ▲ +42.4% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $6.52 Million | $34.49 Million | ▲ +189.3% |
| 2023 | -0.21x | $-8.20 Million | $38.73 Million | ▼ -587.1% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $1.91 Million | $43.97 Million | ▲ +83.8% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $832.00K | $35.19 Million | ▼ -60.6% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $1.92 Million | $32.06 Million | ▲ +168.5% |
| 2019 | -0.09x | $-2.56 Million | $29.26 Million | ▼ -192.4% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $2.95 Million | $31.15 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $1.81 Million | $25.14 Million | ▲ +114.0% |
| 2016 | -0.51x | $-13.58 Million | $26.45 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2015 | -0.35x | $-9.78 Million | $28.34 Million | ▼ -314.7% |
| 2014 | 0.16x | $4.61 Million | $28.70 Million | ▼ -40.2% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | $8.62 Million | $32.08 Million | ▲ +117.2% |
| 2012 | -1.56x | $-48.72 Million | $31.21 Million | ▼ -6811.9% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $2.14 Million | $92.01 Million | ▼ -90.0% |
| 2010 | 0.23x | $24.33 Million | $104.95 Million | ▲ +172.2% |
| 2009 | 0.09x | $11.08 Million | $130.12 Million | ▼ -55.8% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $27.92 Million | $144.81 Million | ▲ +523.7% |
| 2007 | -0.05x | $-9.67 Million | $212.53 Million | ▼ -276.0% |
| 2006 | 0.03x | $5.46 Million | $211.06 Million | ▼ -58.0% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | $11.98 Million | $194.78 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | $11.98 Million | $194.78 Million | ▲ +42.2% |
| 2003 | 0.04x | $8.21 Million | $189.84 Million | ▼ -76.3% |
| 2002 | 0.18x | $34.21 Million | $187.23 Million | ▲ +298.0% |
| 2001 | -0.09x | $-19.56 Million | $211.97 Million | ▼ -483.4% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $4.11 Million | $170.93 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | $4.10 Million | $151.40 Million | ▼ -49.2% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $6.30 Million | $118.10 Million | ▲ +96.9% |
| 1997 | 0.03x | $3.60 Million | $132.90 Million | ▲ +140.3% |
| 1996 | -0.07x | $-7.90 Million | $117.40 Million | ▼ -17.8% |
| 1995 | -0.06x | $-6.70 Million | $117.30 Million | ▼ -215.1% |
| 1994 | -0.02x | $-2.30 Million | $126.90 Million | ▼ -139.1% |
| 1993 | 0.05x | $6.00 Million | $129.60 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 1992 | 0.08x | $10.60 Million | $129.80 Million | ▲ +249.9% |
| 1991 | -0.05x | $-7.70 Million | $141.30 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 1990 | -0.05x | $-6.70 Million | $125.90 Million | — |