Richardson Electronics Ltd (RELL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Richardson Electronics Ltd (RELL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.65 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($39.65 Million) in one year. Explore RELL long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Richardson Electronics Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Richardson Electronics Ltd across 36 annual periods. Also explore Richardson Electronics Ltd assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Richardson Electronics Ltd (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Richardson Electronics Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Richardson Electronics Ltd (RELL) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.27x | $10.55 Million | $39.18 Million | ▲ +42.4% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $6.52 Million | $34.49 Million | ▲ +189.3% |
| 2023 | -0.21x | $-8.20 Million | $38.73 Million | ▼ -587.1% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $1.91 Million | $43.97 Million | ▲ +83.8% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $832.00K | $35.19 Million | ▼ -60.6% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $1.92 Million | $32.06 Million | ▲ +168.5% |
| 2019 | -0.09x | $-2.56 Million | $29.26 Million | ▼ -192.4% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $2.95 Million | $31.15 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $1.81 Million | $25.14 Million | ▲ +114.0% |
| 2016 | -0.51x | $-13.58 Million | $26.45 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2015 | -0.35x | $-9.78 Million | $28.34 Million | ▼ -314.7% |
| 2014 | 0.16x | $4.61 Million | $28.70 Million | ▼ -40.2% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | $8.62 Million | $32.08 Million | ▲ +117.2% |
| 2012 | -1.56x | $-48.72 Million | $31.21 Million | ▼ -6811.9% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $2.14 Million | $92.01 Million | ▼ -90.0% |
| 2010 | 0.23x | $24.33 Million | $104.95 Million | ▲ +172.2% |
| 2009 | 0.09x | $11.08 Million | $130.12 Million | ▼ -55.8% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $27.92 Million | $144.81 Million | ▲ +523.7% |
| 2007 | -0.05x | $-9.67 Million | $212.53 Million | ▼ -276.0% |
| 2006 | 0.03x | $5.46 Million | $211.06 Million | ▼ -58.0% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | $11.98 Million | $194.78 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | $11.98 Million | $194.78 Million | ▲ +42.2% |
| 2003 | 0.04x | $8.21 Million | $189.84 Million | ▼ -76.3% |
| 2002 | 0.18x | $34.21 Million | $187.23 Million | ▲ +298.0% |
| 2001 | -0.09x | $-19.56 Million | $211.97 Million | ▼ -483.4% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $4.11 Million | $170.93 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | $4.10 Million | $151.40 Million | ▼ -49.2% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $6.30 Million | $118.10 Million | ▲ +96.9% |
| 1997 | 0.03x | $3.60 Million | $132.90 Million | ▲ +140.3% |
| 1996 | -0.07x | $-7.90 Million | $117.40 Million | ▼ -17.8% |
| 1995 | -0.06x | $-6.70 Million | $117.30 Million | ▼ -215.1% |
| 1994 | -0.02x | $-2.30 Million | $126.90 Million | ▼ -139.1% |
| 1993 | 0.05x | $6.00 Million | $129.60 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 1992 | 0.08x | $10.60 Million | $129.80 Million | ▲ +249.9% |
| 1991 | -0.05x | $-7.70 Million | $141.30 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 1990 | -0.05x | $-6.70 Million | $125.90 Million | — |