Richardson Electronics Ltd (RELL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Richardson Electronics Ltd (RELL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.10x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.77 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($38.32 Million) in one year. See Richardson Electronics Ltd leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Richardson Electronics Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Richardson Electronics Ltd across 37 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Richardson Electronics Ltd cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Richardson Electronics Ltd (1990–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Richardson Electronics Ltd. Check Richardson Electronics Ltd cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.02x | $762.00K | $38.32 Million | ▼ -92.6% |
| 2025 | 0.27x | $10.55 Million | $39.18 Million | ▲ +42.4% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $6.52 Million | $34.49 Million | ▲ +189.3% |
| 2023 | -0.21x | $-8.20 Million | $38.73 Million | ▼ -587.1% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $1.91 Million | $43.97 Million | ▲ +83.8% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $832.00K | $35.19 Million | ▼ -60.6% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $1.92 Million | $32.06 Million | ▲ +168.5% |
| 2019 | -0.09x | $-2.56 Million | $29.26 Million | ▼ -192.4% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $2.95 Million | $31.15 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $1.81 Million | $25.14 Million | ▲ +114.0% |
| 2016 | -0.51x | $-13.58 Million | $26.45 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2015 | -0.35x | $-9.78 Million | $28.34 Million | ▼ -314.7% |
| 2014 | 0.16x | $4.61 Million | $28.70 Million | ▼ -40.2% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | $8.62 Million | $32.08 Million | ▲ +117.2% |
| 2012 | -1.56x | $-48.72 Million | $31.21 Million | ▼ -6811.9% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $2.14 Million | $92.01 Million | ▼ -90.0% |
| 2010 | 0.23x | $24.33 Million | $104.95 Million | ▲ +172.2% |
| 2009 | 0.09x | $11.08 Million | $130.12 Million | ▼ -55.8% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $27.92 Million | $144.81 Million | ▲ +523.7% |
| 2007 | -0.05x | $-9.67 Million | $212.53 Million | ▼ -276.0% |
| 2006 | 0.03x | $5.46 Million | $211.06 Million | ▼ -58.0% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | $11.98 Million | $194.78 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | $11.98 Million | $194.78 Million | ▲ +42.2% |
| 2003 | 0.04x | $8.21 Million | $189.84 Million | ▼ -76.3% |
| 2002 | 0.18x | $34.21 Million | $187.23 Million | ▲ +298.0% |
| 2001 | -0.09x | $-19.56 Million | $211.97 Million | ▼ -483.4% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $4.11 Million | $170.93 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | $4.10 Million | $151.40 Million | ▼ -49.2% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $6.30 Million | $118.10 Million | ▲ +96.9% |
| 1997 | 0.03x | $3.60 Million | $132.90 Million | ▲ +140.3% |
| 1996 | -0.07x | $-7.90 Million | $117.40 Million | ▼ -17.8% |
| 1995 | -0.06x | $-6.70 Million | $117.30 Million | ▼ -215.1% |
| 1994 | -0.02x | $-2.30 Million | $126.90 Million | ▼ -139.1% |
| 1993 | 0.05x | $6.00 Million | $129.60 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 1992 | 0.08x | $10.60 Million | $129.80 Million | ▲ +249.9% |
| 1991 | -0.05x | $-7.70 Million | $141.30 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 1990 | -0.05x | $-6.70 Million | $125.90 Million | — |