Sandisk Corp (SNDK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sandisk Corp (SNDK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.37x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.02 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.79 Billion) in one year. See SNDK free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Sandisk Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Sandisk Corp across 26 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Sandisk Corp generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Sandisk Corp (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sandisk Corp. Check SNDK cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $84.00 Million | $3.77 Billion | ▲ +117.5% |
| 2024 | -0.13x | $-309.00 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | $-713.00 Million | $2.38 Billion | ▼ -172.4% |
| 2022 | 0.41x | $1.15 Billion | $2.78 Billion | ▲ +37.9% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | $1.05 Billion | $3.49 Billion | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2015 | 0.45x | $1.70 Billion | $3.75 Billion | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2014 | 0.53x | $1.86 Billion | $3.52 Billion | ▲ +207.5% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $529.85 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2012 | 0.34x | $1.05 Billion | $3.11 Billion | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2011 | 0.48x | $1.45 Billion | $3.00 Billion | ▲ +107.8% |
| 2010 | 0.23x | $487.85 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▲ +561.9% |
| 2009 | 0.04x | $87.72 Million | $2.49 Billion | ▼ -87.7% |
| 2008 | 0.29x | $652.93 Million | $2.27 Billion | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2007 | 0.27x | $598.06 Million | $2.19 Billion | ▼ -66.2% |
| 2006 | 0.81x | $480.86 Million | $596.40 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2005 | 0.60x | $227.63 Million | $380.03 Million | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2004 | 0.52x | $272.53 Million | $524.28 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2003 | 0.31x | $106.97 Million | $345.86 Million | ▲ +211.1% |
| 2002 | -0.28x | $-72.07 Million | $258.88 Million | ▼ -178.0% |
| 2001 | 0.36x | $84.85 Million | $237.85 Million | ▲ +79.6% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $17.00 Million | $85.60 Million | ▼ -29.0% |
| 1999 | 0.28x | $13.40 Million | $47.90 Million | ▼ -43.5% |
| 1998 | 0.50x | $26.80 Million | $54.10 Million | ▼ -24.2% |
| 1997 | 0.65x | $13.40 Million | $20.50 Million | ▲ +3.8% |
| 1996 | 0.63x | $12.40 Million | $19.70 Million | ▲ +203.6% |
| 1995 | 0.21x | $1.70 Million | $8.20 Million | — |