Seagate Technology PLC Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Seagate Technology PLC cash flow-to-debt ratio. Seagate Technology PLC (STX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.17x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.30 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($7.80 Billion) in one year. Check STX cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Seagate Technology PLC (2001–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Seagate Technology PLC from 2001 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Seagate Technology PLC across 29 annual periods. Check STX cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Seagate Technology PLC Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2026)
Seagate Technology PLC cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Seagate Technology PLC. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see STX operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.47x | $3.67 Billion | $7.80 Billion | ▲ +268.4% |
| 2025 | 0.13x | $1.08 Billion | $8.48 Billion | ▲ +28.5% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $918.00 Million | $9.23 Billion | ▼ -7.6% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $942.00 Million | $8.76 Billion | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2022 | 0.19x | $1.66 Billion | $8.84 Billion | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $1.63 Billion | $8.04 Billion | ▼ -15.8% |
| 2020 | 0.24x | $1.71 Billion | $7.14 Billion | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2019 | 0.26x | $1.76 Billion | $6.72 Billion | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2018 | 0.27x | $2.11 Billion | $7.75 Billion | ▲ +12.5% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $1.92 Billion | $7.90 Billion | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | $1.68 Billion | $6.66 Billion | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2015 | 0.39x | $2.65 Billion | $6.83 Billion | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2014 | 0.38x | $2.56 Billion | $6.66 Billion | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2013 | 0.53x | $3.05 Billion | $5.74 Billion | ▲ +7.6% |
| 2012 | 0.49x | $3.26 Billion | $6.61 Billion | ▲ +164.0% |
| 2011 | 0.19x | $1.26 Billion | $6.76 Billion | ▼ -46.6% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | $1.93 Billion | $5.52 Billion | ▲ +136.5% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | $823.00 Million | $5.56 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | $823.00 Million | $5.56 Billion | ▼ -67.7% |
| 2008 | 0.46x | $2.54 Billion | $5.53 Billion | ▲ +130.3% |
| 2007 | 0.20x | $943.00 Million | $4.74 Billion | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2006 | 0.34x | $1.46 Billion | $4.33 Billion | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2005 | 0.53x | $1.43 Billion | $2.70 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.53x | $1.43 Billion | $2.70 Billion | ▲ +73.6% |
| 2004 | 0.30x | $635.00 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.30x | $635.00 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2003 | 0.40x | $882.00 Million | $2.20 Billion | ▲ +8.7% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | $905.00 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▲ +118.7% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $390.00 Million | $2.31 Billion | — |