Teradyne Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Teradyne Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Teradyne Inc (TER) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.20x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $281.64 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.37 Billion) in one year. Check Teradyne Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Teradyne Inc (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Teradyne Inc from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Teradyne Inc across 37 annual periods. Check TER total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Teradyne Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Teradyne Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Teradyne Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TER cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.49x | $674.41 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2024 | 0.76x | $672.18 Million | $889.42 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2023 | 0.61x | $585.23 Million | $960.93 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2022 | 0.55x | $577.92 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2021 | 0.88x | $1.10 Billion | $1.25 Billion | ▲ +46.3% |
| 2020 | 0.60x | $868.93 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▲ +36.1% |
| 2019 | 0.44x | $578.75 Million | $1.31 Billion | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2018 | 0.40x | $476.88 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2017 | 0.54x | $626.50 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▲ +13.5% |
| 2016 | 0.48x | $445.80 Million | $933.83 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2015 | 0.70x | $410.59 Million | $582.89 Million | ▼ -34.2% |
| 2014 | 1.07x | $492.06 Million | $459.54 Million | ▲ +158.3% |
| 2013 | 0.41x | $267.27 Million | $644.73 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2012 | 0.62x | $404.53 Million | $650.99 Million | ▲ +55.2% |
| 2011 | 0.40x | $273.76 Million | $683.58 Million | ▼ -51.4% |
| 2010 | 0.82x | $566.80 Million | $688.17 Million | ▲ +287.5% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $121.32 Million | $570.76 Million | ▼ -31.1% |
| 2008 | 0.31x | $163.13 Million | $529.13 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2007 | 0.39x | $128.19 Million | $326.11 Million | ▼ -68.6% |
| 2006 | 1.25x | $450.09 Million | $359.87 Million | ▲ +5288.7% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $14.32 Million | $617.07 Million | ▼ -92.8% |
| 2004 | 0.32x | $254.83 Million | $789.00 Million | ▲ +690.1% |
| 2003 | 0.04x | $34.17 Million | $835.79 Million | ▲ +933.5% |
| 2002 | 0.00x | $-4.25 Million | $866.20 Million | ▲ +95.2% |
| 2001 | -0.10x | $-78.97 Million | $778.01 Million | ▼ -114.0% |
| 2000 | 0.73x | $470.86 Million | $648.90 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 1999 | 0.89x | $367.48 Million | $415.18 Million | ▲ +6.2% |
| 1998 | 0.83x | $238.62 Million | $286.44 Million | ▲ +1847.9% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | $13.45 Million | $314.54 Million | ▼ -95.7% |
| 1996 | 0.98x | $250.82 Million | $254.81 Million | ▲ +124.9% |
| 1995 | 0.44x | $115.54 Million | $263.98 Million | ▼ -20.4% |
| 1994 | 0.55x | $89.41 Million | $162.69 Million | ▼ -25.6% |
| 1993 | 0.74x | $91.80 Million | $124.33 Million | ▲ +111.3% |
| 1992 | 0.35x | $40.70 Million | $116.50 Million | ▲ +23.4% |
| 1991 | 0.28x | $32.30 Million | $114.10 Million | ▼ -21.0% |
| 1990 | 0.36x | $40.90 Million | $114.10 Million | ▼ -24.1% |
| 1989 | 0.47x | $59.10 Million | $125.20 Million | — |