UTStarcom Holdings Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
UTStarcom Holdings Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. UTStarcom Holdings Corp (UTSI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.15x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.47 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($16.82 Million) in one year. Check UTSI operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of UTStarcom Holdings Corp (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of UTStarcom Holdings Corp from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for UTStarcom Holdings Corp across 27 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of UTStarcom Holdings Corp to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
UTStarcom Holdings Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
UTStarcom Holdings Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for UTStarcom Holdings Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of UTStarcom Holdings Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.45x | $-8.82 Million | $19.41 Million | ▼ -134.3% |
| 2024 | -0.19x | $-4.46 Million | $22.97 Million | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2023 | -0.17x | $-4.48 Million | $26.10 Million | ▼ -174.6% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | $7.26 Million | $31.56 Million | ▼ -51.7% |
| 2021 | 0.48x | $18.98 Million | $39.82 Million | ▲ +679.3% |
| 2020 | -0.08x | $-3.40 Million | $41.32 Million | ▲ +82.5% |
| 2019 | -0.47x | $-24.15 Million | $51.31 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2018 | -0.36x | $-26.11 Million | $73.28 Million | ▼ -951.3% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $3.84 Million | $91.72 Million | ▼ -29.9% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $5.73 Million | $95.96 Million | ▲ +158.8% |
| 2015 | -0.10x | $-11.64 Million | $114.60 Million | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2014 | -0.10x | $-15.61 Million | $163.73 Million | ▼ -978.4% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | $-1.92 Million | $216.59 Million | ▲ +90.6% |
| 2012 | -0.09x | $-25.62 Million | $271.44 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2011 | -0.13x | $-41.72 Million | $329.90 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2010 | -0.17x | $-92.18 Million | $535.34 Million | ▼ -71.8% |
| 2009 | -0.10x | $-67.45 Million | $672.96 Million | ▼ -53.0% |
| 2008 | -0.07x | $-55.16 Million | $842.36 Million | ▲ +59.1% |
| 2007 | -0.16x | $-218.21 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -486.0% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | $66.08 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -72.9% |
| 2005 | 0.15x | $218.38 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▲ +412.9% |
| 2004 | -0.05x | $-95.00 Million | $1.95 Billion | ▼ -230.2% |
| 2003 | 0.04x | $50.53 Million | $1.35 Billion | ▼ -87.1% |
| 2002 | 0.29x | $157.34 Million | $539.16 Million | ▲ +130.6% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $40.17 Million | $317.42 Million | ▲ +147.6% |
| 2000 | -0.27x | $-46.16 Million | $173.56 Million | ▼ -341.3% |
| 1999 | 0.11x | $11.30 Million | $102.50 Million | — |