UTStarcom Holdings Corp (UTSI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
UTStarcom Holdings Corp (UTSI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.11x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($20.69 Million) in one year. See UTStarcom Holdings Corp (UTSI) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
UTStarcom Holdings Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for UTStarcom Holdings Corp across 26 annual periods. Also explore UTSI year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for UTStarcom Holdings Corp (1999–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for UTStarcom Holdings Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of UTStarcom Holdings Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.19x | $-4.46 Million | $22.97 Million | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2023 | -0.17x | $-4.48 Million | $26.10 Million | ▼ -174.6% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | $7.26 Million | $31.56 Million | ▼ -51.7% |
| 2021 | 0.48x | $18.98 Million | $39.82 Million | ▲ +679.3% |
| 2020 | -0.08x | $-3.40 Million | $41.32 Million | ▲ +82.5% |
| 2019 | -0.47x | $-24.15 Million | $51.31 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2018 | -0.36x | $-26.11 Million | $73.28 Million | ▼ -951.3% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $3.84 Million | $91.72 Million | ▼ -29.9% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $5.73 Million | $95.96 Million | ▲ +158.8% |
| 2015 | -0.10x | $-11.64 Million | $114.60 Million | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2014 | -0.10x | $-15.61 Million | $163.73 Million | ▼ -978.4% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | $-1.92 Million | $216.59 Million | ▲ +90.6% |
| 2012 | -0.09x | $-25.62 Million | $271.44 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2011 | -0.13x | $-41.72 Million | $329.90 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2010 | -0.17x | $-92.18 Million | $535.34 Million | ▼ -71.8% |
| 2009 | -0.10x | $-67.45 Million | $672.96 Million | ▼ -53.0% |
| 2008 | -0.07x | $-55.16 Million | $842.36 Million | ▲ +59.1% |
| 2007 | -0.16x | $-218.21 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -486.0% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | $66.08 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -72.9% |
| 2005 | 0.15x | $218.38 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▲ +412.9% |
| 2004 | -0.05x | $-95.00 Million | $1.95 Billion | ▼ -230.2% |
| 2003 | 0.04x | $50.53 Million | $1.35 Billion | ▼ -87.1% |
| 2002 | 0.29x | $157.34 Million | $539.16 Million | ▲ +130.6% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $40.17 Million | $317.42 Million | ▲ +147.6% |
| 2000 | -0.27x | $-46.16 Million | $173.56 Million | ▼ -341.3% |
| 1999 | 0.11x | $11.30 Million | $102.50 Million | — |