Village Super Market Inc (VLGEA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Village Super Market Inc (VLGEA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-245.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($493.54 Million) in one year. Explore how much of Village Super Market Inc's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Village Super Market Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Village Super Market Inc across 35 annual periods. Also explore how large is Village Super Market Inc's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Village Super Market Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Village Super Market Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see VLGEA stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $93.22 Million | $511.75 Million | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $80.85 Million | $534.11 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2023 | 0.19x | $104.51 Million | $557.54 Million | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $79.62 Million | $552.34 Million | ▲ +49.8% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $52.69 Million | $547.53 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | $83.95 Million | $583.23 Million | ▼ -52.6% |
| 2019 | 0.30x | $55.79 Million | $183.62 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2018 | 0.33x | $58.88 Million | $178.44 Million | ▲ +20.4% |
| 2017 | 0.27x | $46.15 Million | $168.41 Million | ▼ -23.7% |
| 2016 | 0.36x | $64.10 Million | $178.52 Million | ▲ +272.3% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $17.47 Million | $181.13 Million | ▼ -58.8% |
| 2014 | 0.23x | $52.45 Million | $224.28 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2013 | 0.28x | $51.27 Million | $182.85 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2012 | 0.24x | $43.43 Million | $179.23 Million | ▼ -32.7% |
| 2011 | 0.36x | $64.14 Million | $178.03 Million | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2010 | 0.23x | $35.31 Million | $151.35 Million | ▼ -26.2% |
| 2009 | 0.32x | $47.86 Million | $151.41 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2008 | 0.34x | $45.34 Million | $133.01 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2007 | 0.31x | $35.88 Million | $115.56 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2006 | 0.29x | $35.51 Million | $120.97 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2005 | 0.24x | $29.47 Million | $121.25 Million | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2004 | 0.28x | $30.90 Million | $111.33 Million | ▲ +22.7% |
| 2003 | 0.23x | $24.83 Million | $109.80 Million | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | $22.88 Million | $106.61 Million | ▲ +7.6% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $19.65 Million | $98.58 Million | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2000 | 0.14x | $13.63 Million | $98.77 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $15.20 Million | $83.10 Million | ▲ +43.5% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | $9.80 Million | $76.90 Million | ▼ -30.6% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $13.90 Million | $75.70 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 1996 | 0.14x | $10.50 Million | $76.10 Million | ▼ -3.4% |
| 1995 | 0.14x | $11.80 Million | $82.60 Million | ▲ +25.2% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $9.40 Million | $82.40 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 1993 | 0.08x | $6.90 Million | $88.20 Million | ▲ +38.6% |
| 1992 | 0.06x | $5.30 Million | $93.90 Million | ▼ -66.7% |
| 1991 | 0.17x | $15.30 Million | $90.30 Million | — |