Village Super Market Inc (VLGEA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Village Super Market Inc (VLGEA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.12x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $59.12 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($510.58 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Village Super Market Inc generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Village Super Market Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Village Super Market Inc across 35 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Village Super Market Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Village Super Market Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Village Super Market Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see VLGEA market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $93.22 Million | $511.75 Million | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $80.85 Million | $534.11 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2023 | 0.19x | $104.51 Million | $557.54 Million | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $79.62 Million | $552.34 Million | ▲ +49.8% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $52.69 Million | $547.53 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | $83.95 Million | $583.23 Million | ▼ -52.6% |
| 2019 | 0.30x | $55.79 Million | $183.62 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2018 | 0.33x | $58.88 Million | $178.44 Million | ▲ +20.4% |
| 2017 | 0.27x | $46.15 Million | $168.41 Million | ▼ -23.7% |
| 2016 | 0.36x | $64.10 Million | $178.52 Million | ▲ +272.3% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $17.47 Million | $181.13 Million | ▼ -58.8% |
| 2014 | 0.23x | $52.45 Million | $224.28 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2013 | 0.28x | $51.27 Million | $182.85 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2012 | 0.24x | $43.43 Million | $179.23 Million | ▼ -32.7% |
| 2011 | 0.36x | $64.14 Million | $178.03 Million | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2010 | 0.23x | $35.31 Million | $151.35 Million | ▼ -26.2% |
| 2009 | 0.32x | $47.86 Million | $151.41 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2008 | 0.34x | $45.34 Million | $133.01 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2007 | 0.31x | $35.88 Million | $115.56 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2006 | 0.29x | $35.51 Million | $120.97 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2005 | 0.24x | $29.47 Million | $121.25 Million | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2004 | 0.28x | $30.90 Million | $111.33 Million | ▲ +22.7% |
| 2003 | 0.23x | $24.83 Million | $109.80 Million | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | $22.88 Million | $106.61 Million | ▲ +7.6% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $19.65 Million | $98.58 Million | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2000 | 0.14x | $13.63 Million | $98.77 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $15.20 Million | $83.10 Million | ▲ +43.5% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | $9.80 Million | $76.90 Million | ▼ -30.6% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $13.90 Million | $75.70 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 1996 | 0.14x | $10.50 Million | $76.10 Million | ▼ -3.4% |
| 1995 | 0.14x | $11.80 Million | $82.60 Million | ▲ +25.2% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $9.40 Million | $82.40 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 1993 | 0.08x | $6.90 Million | $88.20 Million | ▲ +38.6% |
| 1992 | 0.06x | $5.30 Million | $93.90 Million | ▼ -66.7% |
| 1991 | 0.17x | $15.30 Million | $90.30 Million | — |