Woodward Inc (WWD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Woodward Inc (WWD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $114.44 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.15 Billion) in one year. See WWD free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Woodward Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Woodward Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Woodward Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Woodward Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Woodward Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Woodward Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | $471.29 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | $439.09 Million | $2.19 Billion | ▲ +25.9% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $308.54 Million | $1.94 Billion | ▲ +56.6% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $193.64 Million | $1.91 Billion | ▼ -59.0% |
| 2021 | 0.25x | $464.67 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $349.49 Million | $1.91 Billion | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | $388.37 Million | $2.23 Billion | ▲ +31.1% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $299.29 Million | $2.25 Billion | ▼ -40.1% |
| 2017 | 0.22x | $307.54 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -27.1% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | $435.38 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▲ +46.9% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | $287.43 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $268.08 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2013 | 0.21x | $222.59 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $141.93 Million | $851.85 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $114.62 Million | $862.34 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $184.57 Million | $860.04 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2009 | 0.22x | $218.65 Million | $987.18 Million | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2008 | 0.42x | $125.35 Million | $297.39 Million | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2007 | 0.41x | $117.72 Million | $285.34 Million | ▲ +31.6% |
| 2006 | 0.31x | $80.54 Million | $256.81 Million | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2005 | 0.25x | $69.43 Million | $273.00 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2004 | 0.32x | $85.22 Million | $268.43 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2003 | 0.24x | $60.77 Million | $255.19 Million | ▼ -40.7% |
| 2002 | 0.40x | $91.39 Million | $227.49 Million | ▲ +22.7% |
| 2001 | 0.33x | $86.99 Million | $265.77 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 2000 | 0.21x | $55.21 Million | $258.10 Million | ▲ +10.2% |
| 1999 | 0.19x | $59.90 Million | $308.70 Million | ▲ +54.6% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | $43.10 Million | $343.30 Million | ▼ -69.2% |
| 1997 | 0.41x | $56.10 Million | $137.50 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 1996 | 0.37x | $52.50 Million | $140.80 Million | ▲ +80.6% |
| 1995 | 0.21x | $31.32 Million | $151.70 Million | ▼ -25.3% |
| 1994 | 0.28x | $35.80 Million | $129.47 Million | — |