Woodward Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Woodward Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Woodward Inc (WWD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $114.44 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.15 Billion) in one year. Check WWD cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Woodward Inc (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Woodward Inc from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Woodward Inc across 32 annual periods. Check Woodward Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Woodward Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Woodward Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Woodward Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see WWD cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | $471.29 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | $439.09 Million | $2.19 Billion | ▲ +25.9% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $308.54 Million | $1.94 Billion | ▲ +56.6% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $193.64 Million | $1.91 Billion | ▼ -59.0% |
| 2021 | 0.25x | $464.67 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $349.49 Million | $1.91 Billion | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | $388.37 Million | $2.23 Billion | ▲ +31.1% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $299.29 Million | $2.25 Billion | ▼ -40.1% |
| 2017 | 0.22x | $307.54 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -27.1% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | $435.38 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▲ +46.9% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | $287.43 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $268.08 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2013 | 0.21x | $222.59 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $141.93 Million | $851.85 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $114.62 Million | $862.34 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $184.57 Million | $860.04 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2009 | 0.22x | $218.65 Million | $987.18 Million | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2008 | 0.42x | $125.35 Million | $297.39 Million | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2007 | 0.41x | $117.72 Million | $285.34 Million | ▲ +31.6% |
| 2006 | 0.31x | $80.54 Million | $256.81 Million | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2005 | 0.25x | $69.43 Million | $273.00 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2004 | 0.32x | $85.22 Million | $268.43 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2003 | 0.24x | $60.77 Million | $255.19 Million | ▼ -40.7% |
| 2002 | 0.40x | $91.39 Million | $227.49 Million | ▲ +22.7% |
| 2001 | 0.33x | $86.99 Million | $265.77 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 2000 | 0.21x | $55.21 Million | $258.10 Million | ▲ +10.2% |
| 1999 | 0.19x | $59.90 Million | $308.70 Million | ▲ +54.6% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | $43.10 Million | $343.30 Million | ▼ -69.2% |
| 1997 | 0.41x | $56.10 Million | $137.50 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 1996 | 0.37x | $52.50 Million | $140.80 Million | ▲ +80.6% |
| 1995 | 0.21x | $31.32 Million | $151.70 Million | ▼ -25.3% |
| 1994 | 0.28x | $35.80 Million | $129.47 Million | — |