China Yuchai International Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
China Yuchai International Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio. China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2019, meaning its operating cash flow of $0.00 could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($12.28 Billion) in one year. Check China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of China Yuchai International Limited (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of China Yuchai International Limited from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for China Yuchai International Limited across 29 annual periods. Check China Yuchai International Limited investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
China Yuchai International Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
China Yuchai International Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for China Yuchai International Limited. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CYD operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.05x | $779.42 Million | $14.75 Billion | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $1.23 Billion | $13.58 Billion | ▲ +1030.0% |
| 2022 | -0.01x | $-119.42 Million | $12.30 Billion | ▼ -125.6% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | $504.56 Million | $13.29 Billion | ▼ -61.2% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $1.42 Billion | $14.46 Billion | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $1.58 Billion | $12.28 Billion | ▲ +102.0% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $670.60 Million | $10.51 Billion | ▼ -54.8% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $1.42 Billion | $10.05 Billion | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2016 | 0.27x | $2.28 Billion | $8.46 Billion | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $1.69 Billion | $9.39 Billion | ▲ +222.8% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $535.69 Million | $9.62 Billion | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2013 | 0.05x | $589.64 Million | $10.86 Billion | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $1.51 Billion | $10.15 Billion | ▲ +215.5% |
| 2011 | -0.13x | $-1.76 Billion | $13.66 Billion | ▼ -183.3% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $1.46 Billion | $9.46 Billion | ▼ -69.2% |
| 2009 | 0.50x | $3.97 Billion | $7.90 Billion | ▲ +3131.5% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $90.37 Million | $5.81 Billion | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $90.37 Million | $5.81 Billion | ▼ -79.1% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $242.77 Million | $3.26 Billion | ▼ -72.5% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | $589.74 Million | $2.18 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.27x | $589.74 Million | $2.18 Billion | ▼ -62.3% |
| 2003 | 0.72x | $1.08 Billion | $1.50 Billion | ▲ +45.5% |
| 2002 | 0.49x | $659.61 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +763.7% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $59.29 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $170.51 Million | $848.33 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 1999 | 0.32x | $233.34 Million | $718.92 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $185.45 Million | $869.28 Million | ▲ +279.9% |
| 1997 | 0.06x | $55.47 Million | $987.76 Million | ▲ +581.9% |
| 1996 | -0.01x | $-13.28 Million | $1.14 Billion | — |