China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2019, meaning its operating cash flow of $0.00 could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($12.28 Billion) in one year. See China Yuchai International Limited free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
China Yuchai International Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for China Yuchai International Limited across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CYD cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for China Yuchai International Limited (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for China Yuchai International Limited. Check CYD operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.05x | $779.42 Million | $14.75 Billion | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $1.23 Billion | $13.58 Billion | ▲ +1030.0% |
| 2022 | -0.01x | $-119.42 Million | $12.30 Billion | ▼ -125.6% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | $504.56 Million | $13.29 Billion | ▼ -61.2% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $1.42 Billion | $14.46 Billion | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $1.58 Billion | $12.28 Billion | ▲ +102.0% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $670.60 Million | $10.51 Billion | ▼ -54.8% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $1.42 Billion | $10.05 Billion | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2016 | 0.27x | $2.28 Billion | $8.46 Billion | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $1.69 Billion | $9.39 Billion | ▲ +222.8% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $535.69 Million | $9.62 Billion | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2013 | 0.05x | $589.64 Million | $10.86 Billion | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $1.51 Billion | $10.15 Billion | ▲ +215.5% |
| 2011 | -0.13x | $-1.76 Billion | $13.66 Billion | ▼ -183.3% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $1.46 Billion | $9.46 Billion | ▼ -69.2% |
| 2009 | 0.50x | $3.97 Billion | $7.90 Billion | ▲ +3131.5% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $90.37 Million | $5.81 Billion | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $90.37 Million | $5.81 Billion | ▼ -79.1% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $242.77 Million | $3.26 Billion | ▼ -72.5% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | $589.74 Million | $2.18 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.27x | $589.74 Million | $2.18 Billion | ▼ -62.3% |
| 2003 | 0.72x | $1.08 Billion | $1.50 Billion | ▲ +45.5% |
| 2002 | 0.49x | $659.61 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +763.7% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $59.29 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $170.51 Million | $848.33 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 1999 | 0.32x | $233.34 Million | $718.92 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $185.45 Million | $869.28 Million | ▲ +279.9% |
| 1997 | 0.06x | $55.47 Million | $987.76 Million | ▲ +581.9% |
| 1996 | -0.01x | $-13.28 Million | $1.14 Billion | — |