China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2019, meaning its operating cash flow of $0.00 could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($12.28 Billion) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of China Yuchai International Limited to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
China Yuchai International Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for China Yuchai International Limited across 29 annual periods. Also explore total assets of China Yuchai International Limited for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for China Yuchai International Limited (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for China Yuchai International Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see China Yuchai International Limited market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.05x | $779.42 Million | $14.75 Billion | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $1.23 Billion | $13.58 Billion | ▲ +1030.0% |
| 2022 | -0.01x | $-119.42 Million | $12.30 Billion | ▼ -125.6% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | $504.56 Million | $13.29 Billion | ▼ -61.2% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $1.42 Billion | $14.46 Billion | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $1.58 Billion | $12.28 Billion | ▲ +102.0% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $670.60 Million | $10.51 Billion | ▼ -54.8% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $1.42 Billion | $10.05 Billion | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2016 | 0.27x | $2.28 Billion | $8.46 Billion | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $1.69 Billion | $9.39 Billion | ▲ +222.8% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $535.69 Million | $9.62 Billion | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2013 | 0.05x | $589.64 Million | $10.86 Billion | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $1.51 Billion | $10.15 Billion | ▲ +215.5% |
| 2011 | -0.13x | $-1.76 Billion | $13.66 Billion | ▼ -183.3% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $1.46 Billion | $9.46 Billion | ▼ -69.2% |
| 2009 | 0.50x | $3.97 Billion | $7.90 Billion | ▲ +3131.5% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $90.37 Million | $5.81 Billion | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $90.37 Million | $5.81 Billion | ▼ -79.1% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $242.77 Million | $3.26 Billion | ▼ -72.5% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | $589.74 Million | $2.18 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.27x | $589.74 Million | $2.18 Billion | ▼ -62.3% |
| 2003 | 0.72x | $1.08 Billion | $1.50 Billion | ▲ +45.5% |
| 2002 | 0.49x | $659.61 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +763.7% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $59.29 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $170.51 Million | $848.33 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 1999 | 0.32x | $233.34 Million | $718.92 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $185.45 Million | $869.28 Million | ▲ +279.9% |
| 1997 | 0.06x | $55.47 Million | $987.76 Million | ▲ +581.9% |
| 1996 | -0.01x | $-13.28 Million | $1.14 Billion | — |