China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2019, meaning its operating cash flow of $0.00 could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($12.28 Billion) in one year. See China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
China Yuchai International Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for China Yuchai International Limited across 29 annual periods. Also explore China Yuchai International Limited annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for China Yuchai International Limited (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for China Yuchai International Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of China Yuchai International Limited.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.05x | $779.42 Million | $14.75 Billion | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $1.23 Billion | $13.58 Billion | ▲ +1030.0% |
| 2022 | -0.01x | $-119.42 Million | $12.30 Billion | ▼ -125.6% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | $504.56 Million | $13.29 Billion | ▼ -61.2% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $1.42 Billion | $14.46 Billion | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $1.58 Billion | $12.28 Billion | ▲ +102.0% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $670.60 Million | $10.51 Billion | ▼ -54.8% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $1.42 Billion | $10.05 Billion | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2016 | 0.27x | $2.28 Billion | $8.46 Billion | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $1.69 Billion | $9.39 Billion | ▲ +222.8% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $535.69 Million | $9.62 Billion | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2013 | 0.05x | $589.64 Million | $10.86 Billion | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $1.51 Billion | $10.15 Billion | ▲ +215.5% |
| 2011 | -0.13x | $-1.76 Billion | $13.66 Billion | ▼ -183.3% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $1.46 Billion | $9.46 Billion | ▼ -69.2% |
| 2009 | 0.50x | $3.97 Billion | $7.90 Billion | ▲ +3131.5% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $90.37 Million | $5.81 Billion | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $90.37 Million | $5.81 Billion | ▼ -79.1% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $242.77 Million | $3.26 Billion | ▼ -72.5% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | $589.74 Million | $2.18 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.27x | $589.74 Million | $2.18 Billion | ▼ -62.3% |
| 2003 | 0.72x | $1.08 Billion | $1.50 Billion | ▲ +45.5% |
| 2002 | 0.49x | $659.61 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +763.7% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $59.29 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $170.51 Million | $848.33 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 1999 | 0.32x | $233.34 Million | $718.92 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $185.45 Million | $869.28 Million | ▲ +279.9% |
| 1997 | 0.06x | $55.47 Million | $987.76 Million | ▲ +581.9% |
| 1996 | -0.01x | $-13.28 Million | $1.14 Billion | — |