Everest Group Ltd (EG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Everest Group Ltd (EG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $290.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($46.74 Billion) in one year. See Everest Group Ltd (EG) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Everest Group Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Everest Group Ltd across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Everest Group Ltd (EG) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Everest Group Ltd (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Everest Group Ltd. Check EG cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $3.40 Billion | $47.05 Billion | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $4.96 Billion | $42.47 Billion | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $4.55 Billion | $36.20 Billion | ▲ +7.3% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $3.69 Billion | $31.52 Billion | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $3.83 Billion | $28.05 Billion | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $2.87 Billion | $23.06 Billion | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $1.85 Billion | $18.19 Billion | ▲ +181.9% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $610.07 Million | $16.89 Billion | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $1.16 Billion | $15.22 Billion | ▼ -26.9% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $1.38 Billion | $13.25 Billion | ▲ +30.2% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $1.11 Billion | $13.82 Billion | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2014 | 0.08x | $1.05 Billion | $13.37 Billion | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $1.10 Billion | $12.84 Billion | ▲ +60.6% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $694.63 Million | $13.04 Billion | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $717.74 Million | $12.82 Billion | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2010 | 0.08x | $918.48 Million | $12.12 Billion | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $784.74 Million | $11.90 Billion | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2008 | 0.06x | $663.00 Million | $11.89 Billion | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $854.43 Million | $12.31 Billion | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2006 | 0.05x | $636.32 Million | $12.00 Billion | ▼ -38.9% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $1.07 Billion | $12.33 Billion | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2004 | 0.13x | $1.49 Billion | $11.36 Billion | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | $1.65 Billion | $9.52 Billion | ▲ +76.8% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $736.13 Million | $7.50 Billion | ▲ +46.9% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $406.03 Million | $6.08 Billion | ▲ +303.3% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $89.96 Million | $5.43 Billion | ▼ -64.4% |
| 1999 | 0.05x | $203.44 Million | $4.38 Billion | ▲ +14.5% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $183.32 Million | $4.52 Billion | ▼ -54.4% |
| 1997 | 0.09x | $376.40 Million | $4.23 Billion | ▼ -14.9% |
| 1996 | 0.10x | $414.00 Million | $3.96 Billion | — |