Kellanova (K) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kellanova (K) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $503.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($11.35 Billion) in one year. See Kellanova (K) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kellanova Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kellanova across 36 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Kellanova to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kellanova (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kellanova. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see K stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.15x | $1.76 Billion | $11.75 Billion | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $1.65 Billion | $12.25 Billion | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $1.65 Billion | $14.12 Billion | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | $1.70 Billion | $13.96 Billion | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | $1.99 Billion | $14.36 Billion | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $1.18 Billion | $14.25 Billion | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $1.54 Billion | $14.62 Billion | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $1.65 Billion | $14.16 Billion | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $1.63 Billion | $13.19 Billion | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2015 | 0.13x | $1.69 Billion | $13.11 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $1.79 Billion | $12.30 Billion | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $1.81 Billion | $11.87 Billion | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $1.76 Billion | $12.70 Billion | ▼ -12.0% |
| 2011 | 0.16x | $1.59 Billion | $10.14 Billion | ▲ +51.2% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $1.01 Billion | $9.69 Billion | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $1.64 Billion | $8.93 Billion | ▲ +37.9% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | $1.27 Billion | $9.49 Billion | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | $1.50 Billion | $8.87 Billion | ▲ +3.8% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | $1.41 Billion | $8.64 Billion | ▲ +18.3% |
| 2005 | 0.14x | $1.14 Billion | $8.29 Billion | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | $1.23 Billion | $8.30 Billion | ▲ +9.9% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $1.17 Billion | $8.70 Billion | ▲ +25.5% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $999.90 Million | $9.32 Billion | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2001 | 0.12x | $1.13 Billion | $9.50 Billion | ▼ -45.9% |
| 2000 | 0.22x | $880.90 Million | $4.00 Billion | ▲ +10.7% |
| 1999 | 0.20x | $795.20 Million | $4.00 Billion | ▲ +15.0% |
| 1998 | 0.17x | $720.00 Million | $4.16 Billion | ▼ -23.7% |
| 1997 | 0.23x | $879.80 Million | $3.88 Billion | ▲ +20.1% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | $711.50 Million | $3.77 Billion | ▼ -48.8% |
| 1995 | 0.37x | $1.04 Billion | $2.82 Billion | ▲ +1.4% |
| 1994 | 0.36x | $966.80 Million | $2.66 Billion | ▲ +14.6% |
| 1993 | 0.32x | $800.20 Million | $2.52 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 1992 | 0.36x | $741.90 Million | $2.07 Billion | ▼ -32.3% |
| 1991 | 0.53x | $934.40 Million | $1.77 Billion | ▲ +19.3% |
| 1990 | 0.44x | $819.20 Million | $1.85 Billion | ▲ +45.9% |
| 1989 | 0.30x | $533.50 Million | $1.76 Billion | — |