CEL-SCI Corp (CVM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CEL-SCI Corp (CVM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.34x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.02 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($11.76 Million) in one year. See CVM free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CEL-SCI Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CEL-SCI Corp across 37 annual periods. Also explore CEL-SCI Corp net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CEL-SCI Corp (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CEL-SCI Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CEL-SCI Corp market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1403.41x | $-17.12 Billion | $12.20 Million | ▼ -105277.3% |
| 2024 | -1.33x | $-18.81 Million | $14.12 Million | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2023 | -1.32x | $-22.85 Million | $17.31 Million | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2022 | -0.99x | $-18.24 Million | $18.36 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2021 | -0.97x | $-18.79 Million | $19.34 Million | ▼ -32.4% |
| 2020 | -0.73x | $-15.28 Million | $20.81 Million | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2019 | -0.73x | $-16.32 Million | $22.49 Million | ▼ -60.4% |
| 2018 | -0.45x | $-13.39 Million | $29.59 Million | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2017 | -0.53x | $-13.79 Million | $26.26 Million | ▲ +71.4% |
| 2016 | -1.84x | $-23.08 Million | $12.55 Million | ▼ -59.5% |
| 2015 | -1.15x | $-23.83 Million | $20.68 Million | ▲ +55.8% |
| 2014 | -2.61x | $-22.93 Million | $8.79 Million | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2013 | -3.27x | $-13.55 Million | $4.14 Million | ▼ -142.8% |
| 2012 | -1.35x | $-12.19 Million | $9.04 Million | ▲ +42.9% |
| 2011 | -2.36x | $-22.56 Million | $9.55 Million | ▼ -83.6% |
| 2010 | -1.29x | $-12.80 Million | $9.95 Million | ▼ -634.7% |
| 2009 | -0.18x | $-6.51 Million | $37.19 Million | ▲ +91.5% |
| 2008 | -2.06x | $-7.94 Million | $3.85 Million | ▼ -155.8% |
| 2007 | -0.81x | $-4.89 Million | $6.06 Million | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2006 | -0.82x | $-8.68 Million | $10.58 Million | ▲ +73.6% |
| 2005 | -3.11x | $-3.07 Million | $987.31K | ▲ +84.7% |
| 2004 | -20.36x | $-4.40 Million | $215.98K | ▼ -1255.5% |
| 2003 | -1.50x | $-2.54 Million | $1.69 Million | ▲ +3.8% |
| 2002 | -1.56x | $-4.23 Million | $2.71 Million | ▲ +90.8% |
| 2001 | -16.91x | $-8.59 Million | $507.73K | ▼ -68.0% |
| 2000 | -10.06x | $-8.53 Million | $847.42K | ▲ +20.1% |
| 1999 | -12.60x | $-6.30 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +14.6% |
| 1998 | -14.75x | $-5.90 Million | $400.00K | ▼ -25.0% |
| 1997 | -11.80x | $-5.90 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +33.2% |
| 1996 | -17.67x | $-5.30 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -707.6% |
| 1995 | -2.19x | $-3.50 Million | $1.60 Million | ▲ +23.4% |
| 1994 | -2.86x | $-4.00 Million | $1.40 Million | ▲ +9.1% |
| 1993 | -3.14x | $-2.20 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -12.2% |
| 1992 | -2.80x | $-1.40 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -117.8% |
| 1991 | -1.29x | $-900.00K | $700.00K | ▲ +8.2% |
| 1990 | -1.40x | $-700.00K | $500.00K | ▼ -40.0% |
| 1989 | -1.00x | $-500.00K | $500.00K | — |