CEL-SCI Corp (CVM) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
CEL-SCI Corp (CVM) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 99.1% as of December 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($101.55K) from net assets ($11.14 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See CVM current assets to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
CEL-SCI Corp Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1987–2025)
This chart shows how CEL-SCI Corp's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 32 annual periods from 1987 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 99.1%, reflecting net assets of $11.14 Million with intangible assets of $101.55K USD. See CEL-SCI Corp defensive liquidity buffer to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for CEL-SCI Corp (1987–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for CEL-SCI Corp from 1987 to 2025, covering 32 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see CVM stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 99.2% | $15.96 Million | $119.86K | $28.16 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2024 | 98.7% | $12.87 Million | $165.49K | $26.99 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2023 | 98.5% | $13.21 Million | $197.70K | $30.53 Million | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2022 | 99.3% | $32.16 Million | $212.20K | $50.52 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2021 | 99.5% | $56.53 Million | $275.87K | $75.87 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2020 | 98.4% | $19.73 Million | $313.42K | $40.54 Million | ▲ +4.5 pp |
| 2019 | 93.9% | $5.13 Million | $311.59K | $27.62 Million | ▲ +28170.0 pp |
| 2018 | -28076.1% | $916.00 | $258.09K | $29.59 Million | ▼ -28173.0 pp |
| 2014 | 96.9% | $10.44 Million | $323.59K | $19.23 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2013 | 95.3% | $6.70 Million | $318.19K | $10.84 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2012 | 94.5% | $7.03 Million | $384.28K | $16.07 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2011 | 95.4% | $9.08 Million | $414.16K | $18.63 Million | ▼ -3.3 pp |
| 2010 | 98.7% | $27.85 Million | $356.08K | $37.80 Million | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2009 | 95.2% | $8.84 Million | $423.10K | $46.03 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2008 | 94.6% | $10.84 Million | $587.44K | $14.68 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2007 | 96.3% | $14.67 Million | $541.38K | $20.73 Million | ▲ +19.3 pp |
| 2005 | 77.0% | $2.11 Million | $484.55K | $3.09 Million | ▼ -14.1 pp |
| 2004 | 91.1% | $5.30 Million | $472.00K | $5.51 Million | ▲ +27.7 pp |
| 2003 | 63.4% | $1.23 Million | $448.00K | $2.92 Million | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2002 | 60.6% | $1.06 Million | $418.00K | $3.77 Million | ▼ -27.7 pp |
| 2001 | 88.4% | $4.00 Million | $464.68K | $4.51 Million | ▼ -7.6 pp |
| 2000 | 95.9% | $12.96 Million | $525.59K | $13.81 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 1999 | 94.4% | $7.10 Million | $400.00K | $7.60 Million | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 1998 | 97.1% | $14.00 Million | $400.00K | $14.40 Million | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 1997 | 91.4% | $5.80 Million | $500.00K | $6.30 Million | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 1996 | 96.6% | $11.60 Million | $400.00K | $11.90 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 1995 | 95.8% | $4.80 Million | $200.00K | $6.40 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 1994 | 95.5% | $6.70 Million | $300.00K | $8.10 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 1993 | 97.2% | $10.90 Million | $300.00K | $11.60 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 1992 | 97.7% | $13.30 Million | $300.00K | $13.80 Million | ▲ +31.1 pp |
| 1991 | 66.7% | $900.00K | $300.00K | $1.60 Million | ▼ -33.3 pp |
| 1987 | 100.0% | $400.00K | $0.00 | $700.00K | — |