Eaton Vance California MBF Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Eaton Vance California MBF cash flow-to-debt ratio. Eaton Vance California MBF (EVM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $8.70 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($120.49 Million) in one year. Check Eaton Vance California MBF total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Eaton Vance California MBF (2006–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Eaton Vance California MBF from 2006 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Eaton Vance California MBF across 18 annual periods. Check EVM cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Eaton Vance California MBF Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2006–2024)
Eaton Vance California MBF cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2006 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Eaton Vance California MBF. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Eaton Vance California MBF operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.08x | $26.64 Million | $334.83 Million | ▼ -92.3% |
| 2023 | 1.03x | $123.91 Million | $120.26 Million | ▲ +1206.9% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $18.00 Million | $228.29 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $16.54 Million | $216.59 Million | ▼ -91.7% |
| 2020 | 0.92x | $209.76 Million | $228.40 Million | ▲ +1011.4% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $19.19 Million | $232.23 Million | ▲ +711.2% |
| 2018 | 0.01x | $2.19 Million | $215.24 Million | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $4.21 Million | $193.62 Million | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $10.72 Million | $211.27 Million | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $7.84 Million | $180.35 Million | ▼ -67.2% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | $25.58 Million | $192.95 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $17.58 Million | $185.51 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | $22.79 Million | $191.80 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | $21.53 Million | $208.18 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2010 | 0.11x | $21.17 Million | $197.50 Million | ▼ -48.5% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $41.24 Million | $198.00 Million | ▼ -91.7% |
| 2007 | 2.51x | $9.85 Million | $3.92 Million | ▼ -97.6% |
| 2006 | 102.97x | $29.20 Million | $283.62K | — |