Eaton Vance California MBF (EVM) — Long-term Investment Intensity
Eaton Vance California MBF (EVM) has a Long-term Investment Intensity of 95.1% as of March 2025. Long-term investments of $344.36 Million represent 95.1% of total assets of $362.04 Million. A higher ratio indicates a company with significant capital committed to long-duration strategic positions. Check EVM cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
LT Investment Intensity
Long-term Investments
Total Assets
Country
Eaton Vance California MBF Long-term Investment Intensity (2006–2024)
This chart shows how Eaton Vance California MBF's Long-term Investment Intensity has evolved across 14 annual periods from 2006 to 2024. As of March 2025, the intensity stands at 95.1%, reflecting long-term investments of $344.36 Million against total assets of $362.04 Million USD. Explore EVM operating cash flow to total debt to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Annual Long-term Investment Intensity for Eaton Vance California MBF (2006–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Long-term Investment Intensity for Eaton Vance California MBF from 2006 to 2024, covering 14 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, long-term investments, the intensity percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see EVM market cap overview.
| Year | LT Investment Intensity | LT Investments (USD) | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 98.6% | $977.90 Million | $991.76 Million | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2023 | 96.6% | $344.26 Million | $356.43 Million | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2022 | 94.1% | $440.65 Million | $468.34 Million | ▼ -2.9 pp |
| 2021 | 97.0% | $512.22 Million | $528.22 Million | ▼ -224.0 pp |
| 2020 | 321.0% | $1.75 Billion | $544.76 Million | ▲ +222.3 pp |
| 2019 | 98.7% | $539.40 Million | $546.50 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2018 | 97.6% | $456.17 Million | $467.18 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2017 | 98.8% | $454.41 Million | $459.97 Million | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2016 | 96.7% | $474.59 Million | $490.55 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2015 | 96.9% | $438.57 Million | $452.40 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2014 | 96.5% | $452.38 Million | $468.97 Million | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2008 | 94.5% | $418.56 Million | $443.01 Million | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 2007 | 98.4% | $515.18 Million | $523.50 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2006 | 98.9% | $519.91 Million | $525.81 Million | — |