Eaton Vance California MBF Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Eaton Vance California MBF working capital to net assets ratio. Eaton Vance California MBF (EVM) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 1.6% as of March 2025. Working capital of $3.87 Million (current assets of $17.68 Million minus current liabilities of $13.81 Million) is measured against net assets of $241.55 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Eaton Vance California MBF (2010–2024)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Eaton Vance California MBF from 2010 to 2024. This chart shows how Eaton Vance California MBF's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 15 annual periods from 2010 to 2024. As of March 2025, the ratio stands at 1.6%, reflecting working capital of $3.87 Million against net assets of $241.55 Million USD. Explore long-term investment intensity of Eaton Vance California MBF to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
Eaton Vance California MBF Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2010–2024)
Eaton Vance California MBF working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2010 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Eaton Vance California MBF from 2010 to 2024, covering 15 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see EVM total asset value.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.2% | $7.76 Million | $656.93 Million | $11.30 Million | $3.54 Million | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2023 | -1.4% | $-3.24 Million | $236.17 Million | $11.42 Million | $14.65 Million | ▼ -12.2 pp |
| 2022 | 10.8% | $26.00 Million | $240.05 Million | $26.86 Million | $853.78K | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2021 | 5.0% | $15.70 Million | $311.64 Million | $16.00 Million | $299.74K | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2020 | 2.2% | $7.05 Million | $316.36 Million | $7.45 Million | $403.42K | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2019 | 1.9% | $6.00 Million | $314.28 Million | $7.10 Million | $1.10 Million | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2018 | 4.0% | $10.06 Million | $251.94 Million | $11.00 Million | $948.11K | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2017 | 1.8% | $4.83 Million | $266.35 Million | $5.56 Million | $727.39K | ▼ -3.5 pp |
| 2016 | 5.3% | $14.76 Million | $279.28 Million | $15.40 Million | $640.96K | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2015 | 4.7% | $12.89 Million | $272.05 Million | $13.23 Million | $332.34K | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2014 | 5.6% | $15.56 Million | $276.02 Million | $15.90 Million | $342.20K | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2013 | 3.8% | $9.48 Million | $250.41 Million | $9.84 Million | $361.87K | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2012 | 0.2% | $684.04K | $282.35 Million | $11.06 Million | $10.37 Million | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2011 | 2.2% | $5.64 Million | $255.29 Million | $16.09 Million | $10.45 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2010 | 2.7% | $7.28 Million | $273.91 Million | $8.08 Million | $802.45K | — |