Eaton Vance California MBF (EVM) — Financial Flexibility Index
Eaton Vance California MBF (EVM) has a Financial Flexibility Index of 0.07x as of March 2025. Free cash flow of $8.70 Million (operating CF $8.70 Million minus capex $0.00) represents 0% of total liabilities ($120.49 Million). Also explore EVM year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Financial Flexibility Index
Free Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Capital Expenditures
Eaton Vance California MBF Financial Flexibility Index (2006–2024)
Historical Financial Flexibility Index trend for Eaton Vance California MBF across 18 annual periods. Check Eaton Vance California MBF strategic asset allocation index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Annual Financial Flexibility Index for Eaton Vance California MBF (2006–2024)
Year-by-year free cash flow to debt coverage for Eaton Vance California MBF. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see market cap of Eaton Vance California MBF.
| Year | Flexibility Index | Free Cash Flow (USD) | Operating CF | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.08x | $26.64 Million | $26.64 Million | $334.83 Million | ▼ -92.3% |
| 2023 | 1.03x | $123.91 Million | $123.91 Million | $120.26 Million | ▲ +1206.9% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $18.00 Million | $18.00 Million | $228.29 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $16.54 Million | $16.54 Million | $216.59 Million | ▼ -91.7% |
| 2020 | 0.92x | $209.76 Million | $209.76 Million | $228.40 Million | ▲ +1011.4% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $19.19 Million | $19.19 Million | $232.23 Million | ▲ +711.2% |
| 2018 | 0.01x | $2.19 Million | $2.19 Million | $215.24 Million | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $4.21 Million | $4.21 Million | $193.62 Million | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $10.72 Million | $10.72 Million | $211.27 Million | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $7.84 Million | $7.84 Million | $180.35 Million | ▼ -67.2% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | $25.58 Million | $25.58 Million | $192.95 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $17.58 Million | $17.58 Million | $185.51 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | $22.79 Million | $22.79 Million | $191.80 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | $21.53 Million | $21.53 Million | $208.18 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2010 | 0.11x | $21.17 Million | $21.17 Million | $197.50 Million | ▼ -48.5% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $41.24 Million | $41.24 Million | $198.00 Million | ▼ -91.7% |
| 2007 | 2.51x | $9.85 Million | $9.85 Million | $3.92 Million | ▼ -97.6% |
| 2006 | 102.97x | $29.20 Million | $29.20 Million | $283.62K | — |