Eaton Vance California MBF Financial Flexibility Index
Eaton Vance California MBF financial flexibility index. Eaton Vance California MBF (EVM) has a Financial Flexibility Index of 0.07x as of March 2025. Free cash flow of $8.70 Million (operating CF $8.70 Million minus capex $0.00) represents 0% of total liabilities ($120.49 Million). See Eaton Vance California MBF free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
Financial Flexibility Index
Free Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Capital Expenditures
Financial Flexibility Index of Eaton Vance California MBF (2006–2024)
Financial flexibility index of Eaton Vance California MBF from 2006 to 2024. Historical Financial Flexibility Index trend for Eaton Vance California MBF across 18 annual periods. Check earnings quality score of Eaton Vance California MBF to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Eaton Vance California MBF Financial Flexibility Index by Year (2006–2024)
Eaton Vance California MBF financial flexibility index by year from 2006 to 2024. Year-by-year free cash flow to debt coverage for Eaton Vance California MBF. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Eaton Vance California MBF cash conversion from operations.
| Year | Flexibility Index | Free Cash Flow (USD) | Operating CF | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.08x | $26.64 Million | $26.64 Million | $334.83 Million | ▼ -92.3% |
| 2023 | 1.03x | $123.91 Million | $123.91 Million | $120.26 Million | ▲ +1206.9% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $18.00 Million | $18.00 Million | $228.29 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $16.54 Million | $16.54 Million | $216.59 Million | ▼ -91.7% |
| 2020 | 0.92x | $209.76 Million | $209.76 Million | $228.40 Million | ▲ +1011.4% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $19.19 Million | $19.19 Million | $232.23 Million | ▲ +711.2% |
| 2018 | 0.01x | $2.19 Million | $2.19 Million | $215.24 Million | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $4.21 Million | $4.21 Million | $193.62 Million | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $10.72 Million | $10.72 Million | $211.27 Million | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $7.84 Million | $7.84 Million | $180.35 Million | ▼ -67.2% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | $25.58 Million | $25.58 Million | $192.95 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $17.58 Million | $17.58 Million | $185.51 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | $22.79 Million | $22.79 Million | $191.80 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | $21.53 Million | $21.53 Million | $208.18 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2010 | 0.11x | $21.17 Million | $21.17 Million | $197.50 Million | ▼ -48.5% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $41.24 Million | $41.24 Million | $198.00 Million | ▼ -91.7% |
| 2007 | 2.51x | $9.85 Million | $9.85 Million | $3.92 Million | ▼ -97.6% |
| 2006 | 102.97x | $29.20 Million | $29.20 Million | $283.62K | — |