MGIC Investment Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
MGIC Investment Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. MGIC Investment Corp (MTG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.12x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $184.96 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.51 Billion) in one year. Check earnings quality score of MGIC Investment Corp to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of MGIC Investment Corp (1991–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of MGIC Investment Corp from 1991 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for MGIC Investment Corp across 35 annual periods. Check MTG cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
MGIC Investment Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2025)
MGIC Investment Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for MGIC Investment Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see MGIC Investment Corp (MTG) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.57x | $852.80 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▲ +8.4% |
| 2024 | 0.53x | $725.03 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2023 | 0.49x | $712.96 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2022 | 0.41x | $650.01 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▼ -31.9% |
| 2021 | 0.61x | $696.32 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▲ +120.2% |
| 2020 | 0.28x | $732.31 Million | $2.66 Billion | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2019 | 0.32x | $609.53 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▲ +22.2% |
| 2018 | 0.26x | $544.52 Million | $2.10 Billion | ▲ +57.5% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $406.66 Million | $2.46 Billion | ▲ +139.3% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $219.66 Million | $3.19 Billion | ▲ +65.2% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $152.04 Million | $3.64 Billion | ▲ +143.0% |
| 2014 | -0.10x | $-409.98 Million | $4.23 Billion | ▲ +51.5% |
| 2013 | -0.20x | $-971.53 Million | $4.86 Billion | ▲ +31.4% |
| 2012 | -0.29x | $-1.57 Billion | $5.38 Billion | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2011 | -0.31x | $-1.88 Billion | $6.02 Billion | ▼ -174.0% |
| 2010 | -0.11x | $-875.43 Million | $7.66 Billion | ▼ -380.5% |
| 2009 | 0.04x | $329.95 Million | $8.10 Billion | ▼ -80.0% |
| 2008 | 0.20x | $1.36 Billion | $6.71 Billion | ▲ +64.8% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $631.97 Million | $5.12 Billion | ▼ -42.3% |
| 2006 | 0.21x | $497.68 Million | $2.33 Billion | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2005 | 0.23x | $508.35 Million | $2.19 Billion | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2004 | 0.25x | $559.16 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2003 | 0.32x | $686.64 Million | $2.12 Billion | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2002 | 0.32x | $613.33 Million | $1.91 Billion | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2001 | 0.40x | $626.12 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2000 | 0.40x | $551.04 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +15.5% |
| 1999 | 0.34x | $455.01 Million | $1.33 Billion | ▲ +14.7% |
| 1998 | 0.30x | $420.95 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -7.2% |
| 1997 | 0.32x | $363.96 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▼ -25.1% |
| 1996 | 0.43x | $367.76 Million | $856.20 Million | ▲ +12.9% |
| 1995 | 0.38x | $286.50 Million | $753.30 Million | ▲ +1.3% |
| 1994 | 0.38x | $239.50 Million | $638.20 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 1993 | 0.34x | $212.70 Million | $631.10 Million | ▲ +21.3% |
| 1992 | 0.28x | $119.70 Million | $430.90 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 1991 | 0.30x | $122.40 Million | $402.10 Million | — |