Natuzzi SpA (NTZ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Natuzzi SpA (NTZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.70 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($248.90 Million) in one year. See NTZ free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Natuzzi SpA Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Natuzzi SpA across 32 annual periods. Also explore Natuzzi SpA (NTZ) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Natuzzi SpA (1993–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Natuzzi SpA. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see NTZ market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.01x | $1.88 Million | $260.82 Million | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $6.12 Million | $265.06 Million | ▼ -70.9% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $21.88 Million | $276.00 Million | ▲ +920.9% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $2.38 Million | $306.20 Million | ▼ -84.0% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $13.59 Million | $280.70 Million | ▲ +179.3% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $4.59 Million | $264.60 Million | ▲ +134.7% |
| 2018 | -0.05x | $-11.72 Million | $234.60 Million | ▼ -121.5% |
| 2017 | -0.02x | $-4.72 Million | $209.40 Million | ▼ -116.1% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $27.34 Million | $194.80 Million | ▲ +206.0% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | $8.66 Million | $188.90 Million | ▲ +124.9% |
| 2014 | -0.18x | $-37.95 Million | $206.00 Million | ▼ -1627.0% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | $-2.23 Million | $209.10 Million | ▲ +74.5% |
| 2012 | -0.04x | $-8.06 Million | $192.40 Million | ▲ +60.6% |
| 2011 | -0.11x | $-21.42 Million | $201.60 Million | ▼ -907.2% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $2.35 Million | $178.60 Million | ▼ -92.7% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $32.57 Million | $181.40 Million | ▲ +209.2% |
| 2008 | -0.16x | $-32.53 Million | $197.78 Million | ▼ -134.8% |
| 2007 | -0.07x | $-14.43 Million | $206.05 Million | ▼ -122.0% |
| 2006 | 0.32x | $62.18 Million | $195.23 Million | ▲ +150.6% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $24.28 Million | $191.06 Million | ▼ -62.6% |
| 2004 | 0.34x | $62.64 Million | $184.24 Million | ▲ +56.9% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | $38.17 Million | $176.13 Million | ▼ -60.4% |
| 2002 | 0.55x | $97.70 Million | $178.34 Million | ▲ +107.7% |
| 2001 | 0.26x | $75.30 Million | $285.47 Million | ▼ -52.4% |
| 2000 | 0.55x | $76.66 Million | $138.42 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 1999 | 0.69x | $71.55 Million | $104.35 Million | ▼ -6.1% |
| 1998 | 0.73x | $87.40 Million | $119.63 Million | ▲ +67.3% |
| 1997 | 0.44x | $46.18 Million | $105.73 Million | ▼ -43.7% |
| 1996 | 0.78x | $79.22 Million | $102.04 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 1995 | 0.58x | $52.02 Million | $89.22 Million | ▲ +420.5% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $11.17 Million | $99.73 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 1993 | 0.24x | $18.37 Million | $75.82 Million | — |