Natuzzi SpA (NTZ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Natuzzi SpA (NTZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.32 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($242.98 Million) in one year. Explore Natuzzi SpA (NTZ) long-term investment share to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Natuzzi SpA Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Natuzzi SpA across 33 annual periods. Also explore NTZ total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Natuzzi SpA (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Natuzzi SpA. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Natuzzi SpA market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.01x | $-2.17 Million | $232.90 Million | ▼ -229.0% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $1.88 Million | $260.82 Million | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $6.12 Million | $265.06 Million | ▼ -70.9% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $21.88 Million | $276.00 Million | ▲ +920.9% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $2.38 Million | $306.20 Million | ▼ -84.0% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $13.59 Million | $280.70 Million | ▲ +179.3% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $4.59 Million | $264.60 Million | ▲ +134.7% |
| 2018 | -0.05x | $-11.72 Million | $234.60 Million | ▼ -121.5% |
| 2017 | -0.02x | $-4.72 Million | $209.40 Million | ▼ -116.1% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $27.34 Million | $194.80 Million | ▲ +206.0% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | $8.66 Million | $188.90 Million | ▲ +124.9% |
| 2014 | -0.18x | $-37.95 Million | $206.00 Million | ▼ -1627.0% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | $-2.23 Million | $209.10 Million | ▲ +74.5% |
| 2012 | -0.04x | $-8.06 Million | $192.40 Million | ▲ +60.6% |
| 2011 | -0.11x | $-21.42 Million | $201.60 Million | ▼ -907.2% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $2.35 Million | $178.60 Million | ▼ -92.7% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $32.57 Million | $181.40 Million | ▲ +209.2% |
| 2008 | -0.16x | $-32.53 Million | $197.78 Million | ▼ -134.8% |
| 2007 | -0.07x | $-14.43 Million | $206.05 Million | ▼ -122.0% |
| 2006 | 0.32x | $62.18 Million | $195.23 Million | ▲ +150.6% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $24.28 Million | $191.06 Million | ▼ -62.6% |
| 2004 | 0.34x | $62.64 Million | $184.24 Million | ▲ +56.9% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | $38.17 Million | $176.13 Million | ▼ -60.4% |
| 2002 | 0.55x | $97.70 Million | $178.34 Million | ▲ +107.7% |
| 2001 | 0.26x | $75.30 Million | $285.47 Million | ▼ -52.4% |
| 2000 | 0.55x | $76.66 Million | $138.42 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 1999 | 0.69x | $71.55 Million | $104.35 Million | ▼ -6.1% |
| 1998 | 0.73x | $87.40 Million | $119.63 Million | ▲ +67.3% |
| 1997 | 0.44x | $46.18 Million | $105.73 Million | ▼ -43.7% |
| 1996 | 0.78x | $79.22 Million | $102.04 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 1995 | 0.58x | $52.02 Million | $89.22 Million | ▲ +420.5% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $11.17 Million | $99.73 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 1993 | 0.24x | $18.37 Million | $75.82 Million | — |