OGE Energy Corporation (OGE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
OGE Energy Corporation (OGE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $175.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.53 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of OGE Energy Corporation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
OGE Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for OGE Energy Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of OGE Energy Corporation to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for OGE Energy Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for OGE Energy Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see OGE company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $1.14 Billion | $9.39 Billion | ▲ +35.2% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $812.80 Million | $9.08 Billion | ▼ -39.8% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $1.23 Billion | $8.28 Billion | ▲ +43.6% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $843.10 Million | $8.13 Billion | ▲ +383.0% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | $-313.30 Million | $8.55 Billion | ▼ -136.4% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $712.80 Million | $7.09 Billion | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $681.50 Million | $6.88 Billion | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $951.10 Million | $6.74 Billion | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $784.50 Million | $6.56 Billion | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $644.70 Million | $6.50 Billion | ▼ -28.4% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $867.10 Million | $6.25 Billion | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $721.60 Million | $6.28 Billion | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $623.20 Million | $6.10 Billion | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $1.05 Billion | $6.85 Billion | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $833.90 Million | $6.09 Billion | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $782.50 Million | $5.27 Billion | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2009 | 0.13x | $654.50 Million | $5.21 Billion | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | $625.00 Million | $4.60 Billion | ▲ +47.0% |
| 2007 | 0.09x | $328.50 Million | $3.56 Billion | ▼ -44.6% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $549.60 Million | $3.29 Billion | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $394.90 Million | $3.52 Billion | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $391.60 Million | $3.52 Billion | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2003 | 0.12x | $398.00 Million | $3.38 Billion | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $350.40 Million | $3.28 Billion | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2001 | 0.18x | $537.77 Million | $2.96 Billion | ▲ +180.2% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $211.37 Million | $3.26 Billion | ▼ -16.0% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $224.30 Million | $2.90 Billion | ▼ -48.7% |
| 1998 | 0.15x | $292.30 Million | $1.94 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $295.30 Million | $1.73 Billion | ▲ +1.3% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $294.70 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▲ +5.7% |
| 1995 | 0.16x | $281.50 Million | $1.77 Billion | ▲ +41.3% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $204.20 Million | $1.81 Billion | — |