Qiagen NV Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Qiagen NV cash flow-to-debt ratio. Qiagen NV (QGEN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $100.63 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.45 Billion) in one year. Check Qiagen NV (QGEN) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Qiagen NV (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Qiagen NV from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Qiagen NV across 31 annual periods. Check how high is Qiagen NV's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Qiagen NV Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Qiagen NV cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Qiagen NV. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Qiagen NV.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.26x | $654.33 Million | $2.52 Billion | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2024 | 0.32x | $673.55 Million | $2.12 Billion | ▲ +59.4% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | $459.45 Million | $2.31 Billion | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $715.26 Million | $2.82 Billion | ▲ +21.0% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $639.00 Million | $3.05 Billion | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $492.27 Million | $3.07 Billion | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $330.84 Million | $2.70 Billion | ▲ +6.2% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $359.50 Million | $3.11 Billion | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $286.78 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▼ -42.8% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $341.60 Million | $1.70 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $317.50 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2014 | 0.16x | $287.96 Million | $1.80 Billion | ▼ -15.5% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | $258.96 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $244.88 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $244.78 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2010 | 0.17x | $250.75 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▲ +21.0% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | $217.00 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | $173.00 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▲ +97.1% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $84.81 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▼ -61.0% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | $101.48 Million | $645.85 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2005 | 0.29x | $91.24 Million | $314.84 Million | ▲ +69.3% |
| 2004 | 0.17x | $53.80 Million | $314.22 Million | ▼ -42.0% |
| 2003 | 0.30x | $64.06 Million | $217.14 Million | ▲ +54.0% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | $36.69 Million | $191.48 Million | ▼ -52.5% |
| 2001 | 0.40x | $58.09 Million | $143.99 Million | ▼ -31.8% |
| 2000 | 0.59x | $38.87 Million | $65.68 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 1999 | 0.47x | $26.18 Million | $55.45 Million | ▲ +36.7% |
| 1998 | 0.35x | $11.60 Million | $33.60 Million | ▲ +1.1% |
| 1997 | 0.34x | $8.50 Million | $24.90 Million | ▲ +54.0% |
| 1996 | 0.22x | $4.10 Million | $18.50 Million | ▼ -20.4% |
| 1995 | 0.28x | $3.90 Million | $14.00 Million | — |