Tidewater Inc (TDW) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tidewater Inc (TDW) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $54.74 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($989.86 Million) in one year. Explore TDW long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tidewater Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tidewater Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Tidewater Inc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tidewater Inc (1993–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tidewater Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Tidewater Inc (TDW) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.28x | $273.85 Million | $963.72 Million | ▲ +178.2% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $104.70 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $40.23 Million | $431.67 Million | ▲ +144.7% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | $15.01 Million | $394.01 Million | ▲ +308.9% |
| 2020 | 0.01x | $3.99 Million | $427.90 Million | ▲ +116.7% |
| 2019 | -0.06x | $-31.42 Million | $563.12 Million | ▼ -1066.8% |
| 2018 | 0.01x | $3.94 Million | $682.82 Million | ▲ +107.5% |
| 2017 | -0.08x | $-57.13 Million | $737.65 Million | ▼ -759.6% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $29.82 Million | $2.54 Billion | ▼ -87.6% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $253.36 Million | $2.68 Billion | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2014 | 0.16x | $358.71 Million | $2.28 Billion | ▲ +231.6% |
| 2013 | 0.05x | $104.62 Million | $2.20 Billion | ▼ -64.3% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $213.92 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $222.42 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▼ -32.3% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $264.21 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▼ -45.9% |
| 2009 | 0.40x | $328.30 Million | $829.30 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2008 | 0.63x | $526.40 Million | $829.10 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2007 | 0.60x | $489.50 Million | $821.70 Million | ▲ +4.5% |
| 2006 | 0.57x | $435.10 Million | $763.30 Million | ▲ +41.8% |
| 2005 | 0.40x | $283.60 Million | $705.40 Million | ▲ +93.5% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | $160.10 Million | $770.50 Million | ▲ +15.3% |
| 2003 | 0.18x | $129.00 Million | $715.70 Million | ▼ -55.5% |
| 2002 | 0.41x | $202.00 Million | $498.20 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 2001 | 0.51x | $193.90 Million | $383.60 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2000 | 0.46x | $150.90 Million | $327.20 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 1999 | 0.74x | $235.10 Million | $318.10 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 1998 | 0.78x | $254.40 Million | $326.80 Million | ▲ +11.1% |
| 1997 | 0.70x | $346.10 Million | $494.10 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 1996 | 0.76x | $205.50 Million | $269.30 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 1995 | 0.75x | $179.20 Million | $239.50 Million | ▲ +73.1% |
| 1994 | 0.43x | $139.20 Million | $322.00 Million | ▼ -19.4% |
| 1993 | 0.54x | $135.70 Million | $252.90 Million | — |