Tidewater Inc (TDW) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tidewater Inc (TDW) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $86.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($977.97 Million) in one year. See TDW financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tidewater Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tidewater Inc across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Tidewater Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tidewater Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tidewater Inc. Check earnings quality score of Tidewater Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.37x | $379.11 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2024 | 0.28x | $273.85 Million | $963.72 Million | ▲ +178.2% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $104.70 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $40.23 Million | $431.67 Million | ▲ +144.7% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | $15.01 Million | $394.01 Million | ▲ +308.9% |
| 2020 | 0.01x | $3.99 Million | $427.90 Million | ▲ +116.7% |
| 2019 | -0.06x | $-31.42 Million | $563.12 Million | ▼ -1066.8% |
| 2018 | 0.01x | $3.94 Million | $682.82 Million | ▲ +107.5% |
| 2017 | -0.08x | $-57.13 Million | $737.65 Million | ▼ -759.6% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $29.82 Million | $2.54 Billion | ▼ -87.6% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $253.36 Million | $2.68 Billion | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2014 | 0.16x | $358.71 Million | $2.28 Billion | ▲ +231.6% |
| 2013 | 0.05x | $104.62 Million | $2.20 Billion | ▼ -64.3% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $213.92 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $222.42 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▼ -32.3% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $264.21 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▼ -45.9% |
| 2009 | 0.40x | $328.30 Million | $829.30 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2008 | 0.63x | $526.40 Million | $829.10 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2007 | 0.60x | $489.50 Million | $821.70 Million | ▲ +4.5% |
| 2006 | 0.57x | $435.10 Million | $763.30 Million | ▲ +41.8% |
| 2005 | 0.40x | $283.60 Million | $705.40 Million | ▲ +93.5% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | $160.10 Million | $770.50 Million | ▲ +15.3% |
| 2003 | 0.18x | $129.00 Million | $715.70 Million | ▼ -55.5% |
| 2002 | 0.41x | $202.00 Million | $498.20 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 2001 | 0.51x | $193.90 Million | $383.60 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2000 | 0.46x | $150.90 Million | $327.20 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 1999 | 0.74x | $235.10 Million | $318.10 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 1998 | 0.78x | $254.40 Million | $326.80 Million | ▲ +11.1% |
| 1997 | 0.70x | $346.10 Million | $494.10 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 1996 | 0.76x | $205.50 Million | $269.30 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 1995 | 0.75x | $179.20 Million | $239.50 Million | ▲ +73.1% |
| 1994 | 0.43x | $139.20 Million | $322.00 Million | ▼ -19.4% |
| 1993 | 0.54x | $135.70 Million | $252.90 Million | — |