Tidewater Inc (TDW) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Tidewater Inc (TDW) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of June 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($0.00) from net assets ($1.39 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore TDW net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tidewater Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1993–2025)
This chart shows how Tidewater Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 33 annual periods from 1993 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of $1.39 Billion with intangible assets of $0.00 USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see TDW company net worth.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Tidewater Inc (1993–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Tidewater Inc from 1993 to 2025, covering 33 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore Tidewater Inc capex to cash flow ratio to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | $1.36 Billion | $0.00 | $2.39 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2024 | 100.0% | $1.11 Billion | $0.00 | $2.07 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | $1.04 Billion | $0.00 | $2.06 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | $865.99 Million | $0.00 | $1.30 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | $701.77 Million | $0.00 | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | $823.27 Million | $0.00 | $1.25 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 100.0% | $1.02 Billion | $0.00 | $1.58 Billion | ▲ +21.3 pp |
| 2018 | 78.7% | $1.14 Billion | $244.22 Million | $1.83 Billion | ▼ -21.3 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | $1.02 Billion | $0.00 | $1.76 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | $1.65 Billion | $0.00 | $4.19 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | $2.31 Billion | $0.00 | $4.98 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | $2.48 Billion | $0.00 | $4.76 Billion | ▲ +10.6 pp |
| 2013 | 89.4% | $2.69 Billion | $283.70 Million | $4.89 Billion | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2012 | 88.4% | $2.56 Billion | $297.82 Million | $4.17 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2011 | 88.2% | $2.53 Billion | $297.82 Million | $4.06 Billion | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2010 | 86.9% | $2.51 Billion | $328.75 Million | $3.75 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2009 | 86.7% | $2.46 Billion | $328.75 Million | $3.29 Billion | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2008 | 85.4% | $2.24 Billion | $328.75 Million | $3.07 Billion | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2007 | 83.0% | $1.93 Billion | $328.75 Million | $2.75 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2006 | 82.6% | $1.89 Billion | $328.75 Million | $2.65 Billion | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2005 | 80.1% | $1.66 Billion | $329.35 Million | $2.36 Billion | ▲ +3.0 pp |
| 2004 | 77.1% | $1.44 Billion | $329.81 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2003 | 75.9% | $1.37 Billion | $328.75 Million | $2.08 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2002 | 75.7% | $1.35 Billion | $328.75 Million | $1.85 Billion | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2001 | 74.4% | $1.29 Billion | $328.75 Million | $1.67 Billion | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2000 | 72.1% | $1.18 Billion | $328.84 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 1999 | 69.7% | $1.11 Billion | $338.01 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -30.3 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $1.07 Billion | $0.00 | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | $998.70 Million | $0.00 | $1.49 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | $769.70 Million | $0.00 | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1995 | 100.0% | $738.70 Million | $0.00 | $978.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1994 | 100.0% | $580.20 Million | $0.00 | $902.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1993 | 100.0% | $557.00 Million | $0.00 | $809.90 Million | — |