United States Cellular Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
United States Cellular Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. United States Cellular Corporation (USM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.19x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-462.49 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.38 Billion) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of United States Cellular Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of United States Cellular Corporation (1989–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of United States Cellular Corporation from 1989 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for United States Cellular Corporation across 36 annual periods. Check United States Cellular Corporation investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
United States Cellular Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2024)
United States Cellular Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for United States Cellular Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of United States Cellular Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.15x | $883.00 Million | $5.84 Billion | ▲ +6.4% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $866.00 Million | $6.10 Billion | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $832.00 Million | $6.54 Billion | ▼ -8.5% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $802.00 Million | $5.77 Billion | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2020 | 0.24x | $1.24 Billion | $5.25 Billion | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $724.00 Million | $3.94 Billion | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $709.00 Million | $3.20 Billion | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | $469.00 Million | $3.15 Billion | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $501.00 Million | $3.46 Billion | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $555.11 Million | $3.49 Billion | ▲ +193.0% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | $172.34 Million | $3.17 Billion | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $290.90 Million | $3.04 Billion | ▼ -70.3% |
| 2012 | 0.32x | $899.29 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2011 | 0.37x | $987.86 Million | $2.65 Billion | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $874.29 Million | $2.40 Billion | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2009 | 0.39x | $881.81 Million | $2.29 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2008 | 0.40x | $922.78 Million | $2.31 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2007 | 0.36x | $863.08 Million | $2.37 Billion | ▲ +39.1% |
| 2006 | 0.26x | $693.45 Million | $2.65 Billion | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2005 | 0.24x | $642.17 Million | $2.64 Billion | ▲ +20.0% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | $518.41 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2003 | 0.26x | $621.65 Million | $2.37 Billion | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2002 | 0.28x | $620.08 Million | $2.23 Billion | ▼ -15.2% |
| 2001 | 0.33x | $440.35 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2000 | 0.43x | $521.33 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▲ +52.2% |
| 1999 | 0.28x | $333.20 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -4.7% |
| 1998 | 0.30x | $311.10 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 1997 | 0.27x | $222.10 Million | $825.70 Million | ▲ +9.2% |
| 1996 | 0.25x | $137.50 Million | $558.40 Million | ▲ +7.4% |
| 1995 | 0.23x | $115.90 Million | $505.30 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 1994 | 0.21x | $84.30 Million | $397.60 Million | ▲ +62.7% |
| 1993 | 0.13x | $35.30 Million | $270.90 Million | ▲ +1294.3% |
| 1992 | 0.01x | $3.50 Million | $374.50 Million | ▲ +111.4% |
| 1991 | -0.08x | $-18.90 Million | $230.10 Million | ▼ -143.1% |
| 1990 | -0.03x | $-5.50 Million | $162.80 Million | ▲ +58.9% |
| 1989 | -0.08x | $-7.30 Million | $88.90 Million | — |