United States Cellular Corporation Tangible Net Worth Ratio
United States Cellular Corporation tangible net worth ratio. United States Cellular Corporation (USM) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 0.7% as of June 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($4.58 Billion) from net assets ($4.61 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check USM strategic asset allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of United States Cellular Corporation (1986–2024)
Tangible net worth ratio of United States Cellular Corporation from 1986 to 2024. This chart shows how United States Cellular Corporation's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 39 annual periods from 1986 to 2024. As of June 2025, the ratio stands at 0.7%, reflecting net assets of $4.61 Billion with intangible assets of $4.58 Billion USD. See United States Cellular Corporation current assets vs equity to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
United States Cellular Corporation Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1986–2024)
United States Cellular Corporation tangible net worth ratio by year from 1986 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for United States Cellular Corporation from 1986 to 2024, covering 39 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market cap of United States Cellular Corporation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.6% | $4.61 Billion | $4.58 Billion | $10.45 Billion | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2023 | -0.8% | $4.65 Billion | $4.69 Billion | $10.75 Billion | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2022 | -2.4% | $4.58 Billion | $4.69 Billion | $11.12 Billion | ▼ -13.0 pp |
| 2021 | 10.6% | $4.57 Billion | $4.09 Billion | $10.34 Billion | ▼ -30.1 pp |
| 2020 | 40.7% | $4.44 Billion | $2.63 Billion | $9.68 Billion | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2019 | 41.5% | $4.22 Billion | $2.47 Billion | $8.16 Billion | ▼ -4.9 pp |
| 2018 | 46.4% | $4.08 Billion | $2.19 Billion | $7.27 Billion | ▲ +6.7 pp |
| 2017 | 39.7% | $3.69 Billion | $2.22 Billion | $6.84 Billion | ▼ -8.5 pp |
| 2016 | 48.3% | $3.65 Billion | $1.89 Billion | $7.11 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2015 | 48.6% | $3.57 Billion | $1.83 Billion | $7.06 Billion | ▼ -7.8 pp |
| 2014 | 56.4% | $3.31 Billion | $1.44 Billion | $6.49 Billion | ▼ -2.5 pp |
| 2013 | 58.9% | $3.41 Billion | $1.40 Billion | $6.45 Billion | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2012 | 61.6% | $3.80 Billion | $1.46 Billion | $6.59 Billion | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2011 | 60.0% | $3.68 Billion | $1.47 Billion | $6.33 Billion | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2010 | 58.9% | $3.53 Billion | $1.45 Billion | $5.93 Billion | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2009 | 58.4% | $3.46 Billion | $1.44 Billion | $5.75 Billion | ▲ +2.7 pp |
| 2008 | 55.7% | $3.26 Billion | $1.44 Billion | $5.57 Billion | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2007 | 53.8% | $3.24 Billion | $1.50 Billion | $5.61 Billion | ▲ +3.9 pp |
| 2006 | 49.8% | $3.03 Billion | $1.52 Billion | $5.68 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2005 | 49.5% | $2.80 Billion | $1.41 Billion | $5.43 Billion | ▲ +13.4 pp |
| 2004 | 36.1% | $2.63 Billion | $1.68 Billion | $5.18 Billion | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2003 | 34.9% | $2.56 Billion | $1.66 Billion | $4.92 Billion | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2002 | 30.3% | $2.47 Billion | $1.72 Billion | $4.70 Billion | ▼ -15.2 pp |
| 2001 | 45.5% | $2.38 Billion | $1.30 Billion | $3.73 Billion | ▼ -4.2 pp |
| 2000 | 49.7% | $2.25 Billion | $1.13 Billion | $3.47 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 1999 | 50.1% | $2.32 Billion | $1.16 Billion | $3.50 Billion | ▲ +12.7 pp |
| 1998 | 37.4% | $1.99 Billion | $1.25 Billion | $3.05 Billion | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 1997 | 31.6% | $1.68 Billion | $1.15 Billion | $2.51 Billion | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 31.6% | $1.53 Billion | $1.04 Billion | $2.09 Billion | ▲ +7.0 pp |
| 1995 | 24.7% | $1.37 Billion | $1.04 Billion | $1.88 Billion | ▲ +8.0 pp |
| 1994 | 16.7% | $1.14 Billion | $947.40 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 1993 | 15.4% | $974.50 Million | $824.50 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▲ +29.1 pp |
| 1992 | -13.7% | $481.10 Million | $547.20 Million | $855.60 Million | ▼ -13.8 pp |
| 1991 | 0.1% | $386.70 Million | $386.50 Million | $616.80 Million | ▲ +20.7 pp |
| 1990 | -20.6% | $117.00 Million | $141.10 Million | $279.80 Million | ▼ -33.4 pp |
| 1989 | 12.8% | $83.70 Million | $73.00 Million | $172.60 Million | ▼ -87.2 pp |
| 1988 | 100.0% | $86.30 Million | $0.00 | $121.00 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1987 | 100.0% | $30.20 Million | $0.00 | $64.30 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1986 | 100.0% | $12.60 Million | $0.00 | $40.30 Million | — |