Universal Technical Institute Inc (UTI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Universal Technical Institute Inc (UTI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $10.33 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($553.56 Million) in one year. See Universal Technical Institute Inc (UTI) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Universal Technical Institute Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Universal Technical Institute Inc across 25 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Universal Technical Institute Inc cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Universal Technical Institute Inc (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Universal Technical Institute Inc. Check Universal Technical Institute Inc (UTI) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $97.33 Million | $498.03 Million | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2024 | 0.18x | $85.89 Million | $484.34 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $49.15 Million | $514.72 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $46.03 Million | $337.51 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $55.19 Million | $324.04 Million | ▲ +309.8% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $11.03 Million | $265.46 Million | ▼ -70.1% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $21.75 Million | $156.24 Million | ▲ +260.7% |
| 2018 | -0.09x | $-13.48 Million | $155.63 Million | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | $-9.98 Million | $148.33 Million | ▼ -246.3% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $7.38 Million | $160.54 Million | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | $8.24 Million | $160.83 Million | ▼ -70.7% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $27.06 Million | $154.88 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | $26.73 Million | $140.69 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $18.51 Million | $122.07 Million | ▼ -67.8% |
| 2011 | 0.47x | $58.07 Million | $123.47 Million | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2010 | 0.50x | $67.48 Million | $134.11 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 2009 | 0.42x | $49.15 Million | $116.65 Million | ▲ +102.1% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $21.09 Million | $101.19 Million | ▼ -43.0% |
| 2007 | 0.37x | $39.63 Million | $108.32 Million | ▼ -12.0% |
| 2006 | 0.42x | $45.41 Million | $109.26 Million | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2005 | 0.65x | $67.76 Million | $104.88 Million | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2004 | 0.59x | $47.66 Million | $81.29 Million | ▲ +169.3% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | $36.42 Million | $167.25 Million | ▲ +84.1% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $20.47 Million | $173.04 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | $21.05 Million | $160.92 Million | — |