Universal Technical Institute Inc (UTI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Universal Technical Institute Inc (UTI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $57.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($498.03 Million) in one year. See UTI free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Universal Technical Institute Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Universal Technical Institute Inc across 25 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Universal Technical Institute Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Universal Technical Institute Inc (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Universal Technical Institute Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Universal Technical Institute Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $97.33 Million | $498.03 Million | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2024 | 0.18x | $85.89 Million | $484.34 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $49.15 Million | $514.72 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $46.03 Million | $337.51 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $55.19 Million | $324.04 Million | ▲ +309.8% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $11.03 Million | $265.46 Million | ▼ -70.1% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $21.75 Million | $156.24 Million | ▲ +260.7% |
| 2018 | -0.09x | $-13.48 Million | $155.63 Million | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | $-9.98 Million | $148.33 Million | ▼ -246.3% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $7.38 Million | $160.54 Million | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | $8.24 Million | $160.83 Million | ▼ -70.7% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $27.06 Million | $154.88 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | $26.73 Million | $140.69 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $18.51 Million | $122.07 Million | ▼ -67.8% |
| 2011 | 0.47x | $58.07 Million | $123.47 Million | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2010 | 0.50x | $67.48 Million | $134.11 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 2009 | 0.42x | $49.15 Million | $116.65 Million | ▲ +102.1% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $21.09 Million | $101.19 Million | ▼ -43.0% |
| 2007 | 0.37x | $39.63 Million | $108.32 Million | ▼ -12.0% |
| 2006 | 0.42x | $45.41 Million | $109.26 Million | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2005 | 0.65x | $67.76 Million | $104.88 Million | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2004 | 0.59x | $47.66 Million | $81.29 Million | ▲ +169.3% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | $36.42 Million | $167.25 Million | ▲ +84.1% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $20.47 Million | $173.04 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | $21.05 Million | $160.92 Million | — |