Universal Technical Institute Inc (UTI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Universal Technical Institute Inc (UTI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $57.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($498.03 Million) in one year. Explore investment intensity of Universal Technical Institute Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Universal Technical Institute Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Universal Technical Institute Inc across 25 annual periods. Also explore UTI current and non-current assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Universal Technical Institute Inc (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Universal Technical Institute Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Universal Technical Institute Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $97.33 Million | $498.03 Million | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2024 | 0.18x | $85.89 Million | $484.34 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $49.15 Million | $514.72 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $46.03 Million | $337.51 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $55.19 Million | $324.04 Million | ▲ +309.8% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $11.03 Million | $265.46 Million | ▼ -70.1% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $21.75 Million | $156.24 Million | ▲ +260.7% |
| 2018 | -0.09x | $-13.48 Million | $155.63 Million | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | $-9.98 Million | $148.33 Million | ▼ -246.3% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $7.38 Million | $160.54 Million | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | $8.24 Million | $160.83 Million | ▼ -70.7% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $27.06 Million | $154.88 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | $26.73 Million | $140.69 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $18.51 Million | $122.07 Million | ▼ -67.8% |
| 2011 | 0.47x | $58.07 Million | $123.47 Million | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2010 | 0.50x | $67.48 Million | $134.11 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 2009 | 0.42x | $49.15 Million | $116.65 Million | ▲ +102.1% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $21.09 Million | $101.19 Million | ▼ -43.0% |
| 2007 | 0.37x | $39.63 Million | $108.32 Million | ▼ -12.0% |
| 2006 | 0.42x | $45.41 Million | $109.26 Million | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2005 | 0.65x | $67.76 Million | $104.88 Million | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2004 | 0.59x | $47.66 Million | $81.29 Million | ▲ +169.3% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | $36.42 Million | $167.25 Million | ▲ +84.1% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $20.47 Million | $173.04 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | $21.05 Million | $160.92 Million | — |