West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.08x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-240.67 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.84 Billion) in one year. See West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
West Fraser Timber Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for West Fraser Timber Co Ltd across 31 annual periods. Also explore West Fraser Timber Co Ltd annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for West Fraser Timber Co Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of West Fraser Timber Co Ltd.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | $138.22 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▼ -84.4% |
| 2024 | 0.37x | $661.00 Million | $1.81 Billion | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2023 | 0.24x | $525.00 Million | $2.19 Billion | ▼ -74.5% |
| 2022 | 0.94x | $2.21 Billion | $2.35 Billion | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2021 | 1.00x | $3.55 Billion | $3.53 Billion | ▲ +68.0% |
| 2020 | 0.60x | $1.02 Billion | $1.70 Billion | ▲ +1041.2% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $88.04 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▼ -89.1% |
| 2018 | 0.48x | $667.39 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2017 | 0.50x | $717.30 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2016 | 0.51x | $512.61 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▲ +150.6% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $216.91 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▼ -41.7% |
| 2014 | 0.35x | $409.18 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2013 | 0.36x | $393.51 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▲ +109.1% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $196.01 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▲ +126.2% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $79.04 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▼ -79.2% |
| 2010 | 0.37x | $386.54 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +315.5% |
| 2009 | 0.09x | $101.14 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | $147.17 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▲ +180.1% |
| 2007 | -0.16x | $-241.27 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▼ -132.7% |
| 2006 | 0.49x | $755.15 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▲ +2844.1% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $25.58 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▼ -90.9% |
| 2004 | 0.18x | $328.68 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2003 | 0.20x | $116.98 Million | $596.55 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2002 | 0.35x | $181.05 Million | $523.35 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2001 | 0.49x | $354.76 Million | $721.85 Million | ▲ +301.2% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | $108.33 Million | $884.38 Million | ▼ -59.4% |
| 1999 | 0.30x | $258.02 Million | $855.19 Million | ▲ +159.6% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $91.51 Million | $787.22 Million | ▼ -40.3% |
| 1997 | 0.19x | $162.96 Million | $836.48 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 1996 | 0.22x | $185.86 Million | $847.71 Million | ▲ +42.2% |
| 1995 | 0.15x | $135.79 Million | $880.71 Million | — |