West Fraser Timber Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
West Fraser Timber Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $192.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.87 Billion) in one year. Check West Fraser Timber Co Ltd cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of West Fraser Timber Co Ltd from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for West Fraser Timber Co Ltd across 31 annual periods. Check WFG cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
West Fraser Timber Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
West Fraser Timber Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for West Fraser Timber Co Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.05x | $96.00 Million | $1.77 Billion | ▼ -85.1% |
| 2024 | 0.37x | $661.00 Million | $1.81 Billion | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2023 | 0.24x | $525.00 Million | $2.19 Billion | ▼ -74.5% |
| 2022 | 0.94x | $2.21 Billion | $2.35 Billion | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2021 | 1.00x | $3.55 Billion | $3.53 Billion | ▲ +68.0% |
| 2020 | 0.60x | $1.02 Billion | $1.70 Billion | ▲ +1041.2% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $88.04 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▼ -89.1% |
| 2018 | 0.48x | $667.39 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2017 | 0.50x | $717.30 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2016 | 0.51x | $512.61 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▲ +150.6% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $216.91 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▼ -41.7% |
| 2014 | 0.35x | $409.18 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2013 | 0.36x | $393.51 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▲ +99.9% |
| 2012 | 0.18x | $205.06 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▲ +124.7% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $83.25 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▼ -80.8% |
| 2010 | 0.42x | $440.63 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +373.7% |
| 2009 | 0.09x | $101.14 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | $147.17 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▲ +180.1% |
| 2007 | -0.16x | $-241.27 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▼ -132.7% |
| 2006 | 0.49x | $755.15 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▲ +2844.1% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $25.58 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▼ -90.9% |
| 2004 | 0.18x | $328.68 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2003 | 0.20x | $116.98 Million | $596.55 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2002 | 0.35x | $181.05 Million | $523.35 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2001 | 0.49x | $354.90 Million | $721.85 Million | ▲ +383.2% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | $89.99 Million | $884.38 Million | ▼ -66.3% |
| 1999 | 0.30x | $258.02 Million | $855.19 Million | ▲ +159.6% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $91.51 Million | $787.22 Million | ▼ -40.3% |
| 1997 | 0.19x | $162.96 Million | $836.48 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 1996 | 0.22x | $185.86 Million | $847.71 Million | ▲ +42.2% |
| 1995 | 0.15x | $135.79 Million | $880.71 Million | — |