Braskem S.A. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Braskem S.A. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Braskem S.A. (BRKM3) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of R$-683.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (R$90.56 Billion) in one year. Check Braskem S.A. (BRKM3) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Braskem S.A. (1998–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Braskem S.A. from 1998 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Braskem S.A. across 27 annual periods. Check Braskem S.A. (BRKM3) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Braskem S.A. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2024)
Braskem S.A. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Braskem S.A.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Braskem S.A. (BRKM3) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (BRL) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.02x | R$2.44 Billion | R$105.85 Billion | ▲ +189.6% |
| 2023 | -0.03x | R$-2.27 Billion | R$88.46 Billion | ▼ -123.5% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | R$8.95 Billion | R$81.94 Billion | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | R$14.79 Billion | R$86.36 Billion | ▲ +144.7% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | R$6.29 Billion | R$89.95 Billion | ▲ +98.2% |
| 2019 | 0.04x | R$2.27 Billion | R$64.18 Billion | ▼ -79.7% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | R$9.25 Billion | R$53.15 Billion | ▲ +234.1% |
| 2017 | 0.05x | R$2.46 Billion | R$47.26 Billion | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | R$4.75 Billion | R$50.10 Billion | ▼ -30.4% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | R$8.13 Billion | R$59.68 Billion | ▲ +57.6% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | R$3.79 Billion | R$43.90 Billion | ▲ +38.1% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | R$2.46 Billion | R$39.31 Billion | ▼ -20.9% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | R$2.57 Billion | R$32.52 Billion | ▼ -21.9% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | R$2.78 Billion | R$27.42 Billion | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2010 | 0.11x | R$2.72 Billion | R$24.07 Billion | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | R$1.37 Billion | R$17.60 Billion | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | R$2.88 Billion | R$19.02 Billion | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | R$2.39 Billion | R$14.50 Billion | ▲ +387.4% |
| 2006 | 0.03x | R$404.32 Million | R$11.94 Billion | ▼ -78.5% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | R$1.72 Billion | R$10.93 Billion | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2004 | 0.18x | R$1.95 Billion | R$10.67 Billion | ▲ +253.1% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | R$578.16 Million | R$11.17 Billion | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | R$1.52 Billion | R$11.28 Billion | ▲ +85.5% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | R$225.57 Million | R$3.10 Billion | ▼ -68.2% |
| 2000 | 0.23x | R$324.87 Million | R$1.42 Billion | ▼ -16.8% |
| 1999 | 0.27x | R$405.59 Million | R$1.48 Billion | ▲ +13.9% |
| 1998 | 0.24x | R$292.87 Million | R$1.21 Billion | — |