Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd (600338) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd (600338) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥238.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥2.26 Billion) in one year. See Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd across 27 annual periods. Also explore Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CNY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.26x | CN¥601.08 Million | CN¥2.33 Billion | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2024 | 0.29x | CN¥738.67 Million | CN¥2.52 Billion | ▲ +122.0% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | CN¥298.64 Million | CN¥2.27 Billion | ▼ -67.8% |
| 2022 | 0.41x | CN¥772.56 Million | CN¥1.89 Billion | ▼ -39.2% |
| 2021 | 0.67x | CN¥829.18 Million | CN¥1.23 Billion | ▲ +218.3% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | CN¥366.71 Million | CN¥1.74 Billion | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2019 | 0.68x | CN¥977.18 Million | CN¥1.44 Billion | ▲ +170.1% |
| 2018 | 0.25x | CN¥658.47 Million | CN¥2.62 Billion | ▼ -64.6% |
| 2017 | 0.71x | CN¥1.09 Billion | CN¥1.53 Billion | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2016 | 0.89x | CN¥579.23 Million | CN¥648.52 Million | ▲ +144.1% |
| 2015 | 0.37x | CN¥196.48 Million | CN¥536.96 Million | ▲ +195.2% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | CN¥54.24 Million | CN¥437.57 Million | ▲ +1923.1% |
| 2013 | 0.01x | CN¥2.95 Million | CN¥480.77 Million | ▲ +113.3% |
| 2012 | -0.05x | CN¥-18.03 Million | CN¥391.08 Million | ▼ -418.5% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | CN¥7.59 Million | CN¥524.27 Million | ▼ -76.3% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | CN¥32.27 Million | CN¥529.17 Million | ▲ +14.1% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | CN¥31.55 Million | CN¥590.63 Million | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | CN¥64.87 Million | CN¥505.36 Million | ▲ +179.0% |
| 2007 | -0.16x | CN¥-106.68 Million | CN¥656.19 Million | ▼ -214.6% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | CN¥105.17 Million | CN¥741.18 Million | ▲ +892.6% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | CN¥-5.63 Million | CN¥314.71 Million | ▼ -128.1% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | CN¥24.05 Million | CN¥377.70 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | CN¥21.34 Million | CN¥414.88 Million | ▼ -55.1% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | CN¥61.37 Million | CN¥535.70 Million | ▲ +148.1% |
| 2001 | -0.24x | CN¥-96.55 Million | CN¥405.14 Million | ▼ -199.8% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | CN¥118.73 Million | CN¥496.95 Million | ▲ +194.0% |
| 1999 | -0.25x | CN¥-106.28 Million | CN¥418.10 Million | — |