Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd (600338) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd (600338) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥238.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥2.26 Billion) in one year. Explore 600338 strategic capital deployment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd across 27 annual periods. Also explore 600338 current and non-current assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see 600338 stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CNY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.26x | CN¥601.08 Million | CN¥2.33 Billion | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2024 | 0.29x | CN¥738.67 Million | CN¥2.52 Billion | ▲ +122.0% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | CN¥298.64 Million | CN¥2.27 Billion | ▼ -67.8% |
| 2022 | 0.41x | CN¥772.56 Million | CN¥1.89 Billion | ▼ -39.2% |
| 2021 | 0.67x | CN¥829.18 Million | CN¥1.23 Billion | ▲ +218.3% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | CN¥366.71 Million | CN¥1.74 Billion | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2019 | 0.68x | CN¥977.18 Million | CN¥1.44 Billion | ▲ +170.1% |
| 2018 | 0.25x | CN¥658.47 Million | CN¥2.62 Billion | ▼ -64.6% |
| 2017 | 0.71x | CN¥1.09 Billion | CN¥1.53 Billion | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2016 | 0.89x | CN¥579.23 Million | CN¥648.52 Million | ▲ +144.1% |
| 2015 | 0.37x | CN¥196.48 Million | CN¥536.96 Million | ▲ +195.2% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | CN¥54.24 Million | CN¥437.57 Million | ▲ +1923.1% |
| 2013 | 0.01x | CN¥2.95 Million | CN¥480.77 Million | ▲ +113.3% |
| 2012 | -0.05x | CN¥-18.03 Million | CN¥391.08 Million | ▼ -418.5% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | CN¥7.59 Million | CN¥524.27 Million | ▼ -76.3% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | CN¥32.27 Million | CN¥529.17 Million | ▲ +14.1% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | CN¥31.55 Million | CN¥590.63 Million | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | CN¥64.87 Million | CN¥505.36 Million | ▲ +179.0% |
| 2007 | -0.16x | CN¥-106.68 Million | CN¥656.19 Million | ▼ -214.6% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | CN¥105.17 Million | CN¥741.18 Million | ▲ +892.6% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | CN¥-5.63 Million | CN¥314.71 Million | ▼ -128.1% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | CN¥24.05 Million | CN¥377.70 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | CN¥21.34 Million | CN¥414.88 Million | ▼ -55.1% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | CN¥61.37 Million | CN¥535.70 Million | ▲ +148.1% |
| 2001 | -0.24x | CN¥-96.55 Million | CN¥405.14 Million | ▼ -199.8% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | CN¥118.73 Million | CN¥496.95 Million | ▲ +194.0% |
| 1999 | -0.25x | CN¥-106.28 Million | CN¥418.10 Million | — |