Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd (600338) — Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd (600338) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 72.4% as of June 2022. Strategic assets (PP&E of CN¥2.58 Billion plus long-term investments of CN¥-) total CN¥2.58 Billion, measured against net assets of CN¥3.56 Billion. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd Strategic Asset Allocation Index (2000–2021)
This chart shows how Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 15 annual periods from 2000 to 2021. As of June 2022, the index stands at 72.4%, representing strategic assets of CN¥2.58 Billion against net assets of CN¥3.56 Billion CNY. Explore Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd (600338) cash flow conversion to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd (2000–2021)
The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd from 2000 to 2021, covering 15 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Tibet Summit Resources Co Ltd (600338) market capitalisation.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (CNY) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 121.0% | CN¥3.32 Billion | CN¥3.32 Billion | CN¥- | CN¥2.74 Billion | ▼ -26.4 pp |
| 2020 | 147.4% | CN¥3.01 Billion | CN¥3.01 Billion | CN¥- | CN¥2.04 Billion | ▲ +73.9 pp |
| 2019 | 73.5% | CN¥2.01 Billion | CN¥2.01 Billion | CN¥- | CN¥2.74 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2018 | 73.8% | CN¥1.60 Billion | CN¥1.57 Billion | CN¥31.12 Million | CN¥2.17 Billion | ▼ -5.9 pp |
| 2017 | 79.7% | CN¥1.36 Billion | CN¥1.33 Billion | CN¥31.20 Million | CN¥1.70 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2016 | 79.7% | CN¥1.03 Billion | CN¥1.00 Billion | CN¥31.17 Million | CN¥1.30 Billion | ▼ -25.1 pp |
| 2015 | 104.7% | CN¥702.20 Million | CN¥700.97 Million | CN¥1.24 Million | CN¥670.37 Million | ▼ -70.5 pp |
| 2014 | 175.3% | CN¥108.20 Million | CN¥108.20 Million | CN¥- | CN¥61.74 Million | ▼ -87.4 pp |
| 2013 | 262.6% | CN¥139.86 Million | CN¥139.86 Million | CN¥- | CN¥53.25 Million | ▼ -504.2 pp |
| 2012 | 766.9% | CN¥204.81 Million | CN¥204.81 Million | CN¥- | CN¥26.71 Million | ▲ +136.5 pp |
| 2004 | 630.4% | CN¥168.46 Million | CN¥168.46 Million | CN¥- | CN¥26.72 Million | ▼ -194.7 pp |
| 2003 | 825.1% | CN¥177.94 Million | CN¥177.94 Million | CN¥- | CN¥21.57 Million | ▲ +785.1 pp |
| 2002 | 40.0% | CN¥185.27 Million | CN¥185.27 Million | CN¥- | CN¥463.36 Million | ▲ +25.7 pp |
| 2001 | 14.3% | CN¥87.35 Million | CN¥87.35 Million | CN¥- | CN¥610.72 Million | ▼ -6.1 pp |
| 2000 | 20.4% | CN¥120.49 Million | CN¥120.49 Million | CN¥- | CN¥591.55 Million | — |