AB Electrolux (publ) (ELUX-A) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
AB Electrolux (publ) (ELUX-A) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of Skr4.60 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (Skr105.92 Billion) in one year. See AB Electrolux (publ) (ELUX-A) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
AB Electrolux (publ) Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for AB Electrolux (publ) across 35 annual periods. Also explore ELUX-A shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for AB Electrolux (publ) (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for AB Electrolux (publ). For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see AB Electrolux (publ) stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (SEK) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | Skr1.19 Billion | Skr105.92 Billion | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2024 | 0.04x | Skr4.20 Billion | Skr115.67 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | Skr4.00 Billion | Skr108.78 Billion | ▲ +279.1% |
| 2022 | -0.02x | Skr-2.27 Billion | Skr110.65 Billion | ▼ -125.9% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | Skr7.06 Billion | Skr89.00 Billion | ▼ -46.2% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | Skr11.93 Billion | Skr80.89 Billion | ▲ +47.3% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | Skr8.43 Billion | Skr84.23 Billion | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | Skr8.05 Billion | Skr75.56 Billion | ▼ -26.6% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | Skr10.02 Billion | Skr69.08 Billion | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | Skr10.16 Billion | Skr68.11 Billion | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | Skr8.27 Billion | Skr68.47 Billion | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | Skr7.82 Billion | Skr69.22 Billion | ▲ +56.5% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | Skr4.46 Billion | Skr61.69 Billion | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | Skr7.16 Billion | Skr56.33 Billion | ▲ +31.1% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | Skr5.40 Billion | Skr55.74 Billion | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | Skr7.68 Billion | Skr52.91 Billion | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | Skr8.30 Billion | Skr53.85 Billion | ▲ +77.2% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | Skr4.95 Billion | Skr56.94 Billion | ▼ -18.6% |
| 2007 | 0.11x | Skr5.35 Billion | Skr50.05 Billion | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | Skr4.56 Billion | Skr52.85 Billion | ▼ -25.2% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | Skr6.54 Billion | Skr56.67 Billion | ▼ -30.8% |
| 2004 | 0.17x | Skr8.64 Billion | Skr51.85 Billion | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | Skr6.29 Billion | Skr49.50 Billion | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | Skr10.92 Billion | Skr57.33 Billion | ▲ +30.3% |
| 2001 | 0.15x | Skr9.48 Billion | Skr64.85 Billion | ▲ +44.2% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | Skr6.14 Billion | Skr60.59 Billion | ▼ -35.6% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | Skr8.65 Billion | Skr54.98 Billion | ▲ +93.8% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | Skr4.70 Billion | Skr57.90 Billion | ▼ -54.6% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | Skr8.69 Billion | Skr48.61 Billion | ▲ +175.1% |
| 1996 | 0.06x | Skr3.97 Billion | Skr61.16 Billion | ▲ +4.1% |
| 1995 | 0.06x | Skr3.79 Billion | Skr60.67 Billion | ▼ -37.1% |
| 1994 | 0.10x | Skr6.26 Billion | Skr63.12 Billion | ▼ -7.1% |
| 1993 | 0.11x | Skr6.45 Billion | Skr60.42 Billion | ▲ +38.3% |
| 1992 | 0.08x | Skr4.20 Billion | Skr54.48 Billion | ▼ -35.2% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | Skr5.55 Billion | Skr46.64 Billion | — |