AB Electrolux (publ) (ELUX-A) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
AB Electrolux (publ) (ELUX-A) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of Skr4.60 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (Skr105.92 Billion) in one year. See ELUX-A free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
AB Electrolux (publ) Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for AB Electrolux (publ) across 35 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of AB Electrolux (publ).
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for AB Electrolux (publ) (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for AB Electrolux (publ). Check AB Electrolux (publ) cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (SEK) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | Skr1.19 Billion | Skr105.92 Billion | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2024 | 0.04x | Skr4.20 Billion | Skr115.67 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | Skr4.00 Billion | Skr108.78 Billion | ▲ +279.1% |
| 2022 | -0.02x | Skr-2.27 Billion | Skr110.65 Billion | ▼ -125.9% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | Skr7.06 Billion | Skr89.00 Billion | ▼ -46.2% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | Skr11.93 Billion | Skr80.89 Billion | ▲ +47.3% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | Skr8.43 Billion | Skr84.23 Billion | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | Skr8.05 Billion | Skr75.56 Billion | ▼ -26.6% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | Skr10.02 Billion | Skr69.08 Billion | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | Skr10.16 Billion | Skr68.11 Billion | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | Skr8.27 Billion | Skr68.47 Billion | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | Skr7.82 Billion | Skr69.22 Billion | ▲ +56.5% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | Skr4.46 Billion | Skr61.69 Billion | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | Skr7.16 Billion | Skr56.33 Billion | ▲ +31.1% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | Skr5.40 Billion | Skr55.74 Billion | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | Skr7.68 Billion | Skr52.91 Billion | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | Skr8.30 Billion | Skr53.85 Billion | ▲ +77.2% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | Skr4.95 Billion | Skr56.94 Billion | ▼ -18.6% |
| 2007 | 0.11x | Skr5.35 Billion | Skr50.05 Billion | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | Skr4.56 Billion | Skr52.85 Billion | ▼ -25.2% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | Skr6.54 Billion | Skr56.67 Billion | ▼ -30.8% |
| 2004 | 0.17x | Skr8.64 Billion | Skr51.85 Billion | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | Skr6.29 Billion | Skr49.50 Billion | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | Skr10.92 Billion | Skr57.33 Billion | ▲ +30.3% |
| 2001 | 0.15x | Skr9.48 Billion | Skr64.85 Billion | ▲ +44.2% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | Skr6.14 Billion | Skr60.59 Billion | ▼ -35.6% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | Skr8.65 Billion | Skr54.98 Billion | ▲ +93.8% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | Skr4.70 Billion | Skr57.90 Billion | ▼ -54.6% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | Skr8.69 Billion | Skr48.61 Billion | ▲ +175.1% |
| 1996 | 0.06x | Skr3.97 Billion | Skr61.16 Billion | ▲ +4.1% |
| 1995 | 0.06x | Skr3.79 Billion | Skr60.67 Billion | ▼ -37.1% |
| 1994 | 0.10x | Skr6.26 Billion | Skr63.12 Billion | ▼ -7.1% |
| 1993 | 0.11x | Skr6.45 Billion | Skr60.42 Billion | ▲ +38.3% |
| 1992 | 0.08x | Skr4.20 Billion | Skr54.48 Billion | ▼ -35.2% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | Skr5.55 Billion | Skr46.64 Billion | — |