Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) cash flow-to-debt ratio. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC-B) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of Skr7.94 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (Skr179.98 Billion) in one year. Check ERIC-B cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (1991–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) from 1991 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) across 34 annual periods. Check Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2024)
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ). For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ERIC-B cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (SEK) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.23x | Skr46.26 Billion | Skr199.39 Billion | ▲ +587.7% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | Skr7.18 Billion | Skr212.73 Billion | ▼ -76.4% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | Skr30.86 Billion | Skr216.23 Billion | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | Skr39.06 Billion | Skr198.51 Billion | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | Skr28.93 Billion | Skr186.35 Billion | ▲ +79.0% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | Skr16.87 Billion | Skr194.50 Billion | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | Skr9.34 Billion | Skr180.99 Billion | ▼ -13.8% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | Skr9.60 Billion | Skr160.37 Billion | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | Skr14.01 Billion | Skr142.85 Billion | ▼ -34.8% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | Skr20.60 Billion | Skr137.00 Billion | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | Skr18.70 Billion | Skr148.25 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | Skr17.39 Billion | Skr127.57 Billion | ▼ -15.5% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | Skr22.03 Billion | Skr136.51 Billion | ▲ +118.4% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | Skr9.98 Billion | Skr135.08 Billion | ▼ -62.5% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | Skr26.58 Billion | Skr135.03 Billion | ▲ +251.6% |
| 2009 | -0.13x | Skr-3.77 Billion | Skr29.05 Billion | ▼ -177.7% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | Skr24.00 Billion | Skr143.60 Billion | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | Skr19.25 Billion | Skr110.27 Billion | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | Skr18.43 Billion | Skr93.78 Billion | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | Skr16.66 Billion | Skr103.24 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | Skr22.63 Billion | Skr105.38 Billion | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | Skr22.85 Billion | Skr119.48 Billion | ▲ +350.6% |
| 2002 | -0.08x | Skr-10.11 Billion | Skr132.46 Billion | ▼ -1892.8% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | Skr-681.05 Million | Skr177.86 Billion | ▲ +94.5% |
| 2000 | -0.07x | Skr-10.93 Billion | Skr156.99 Billion | ▼ -170.7% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | Skr12.91 Billion | Skr131.14 Billion | ▲ +36.3% |
| 1998 | 0.07x | Skr7.40 Billion | Skr102.37 Billion | ▼ -56.2% |
| 1997 | 0.16x | Skr14.98 Billion | Skr90.87 Billion | ▲ +21.0% |
| 1996 | 0.14x | Skr9.29 Billion | Skr68.24 Billion | ▲ +164.6% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | Skr2.80 Billion | Skr54.32 Billion | ▼ -73.9% |
| 1994 | 0.20x | Skr9.44 Billion | Skr47.86 Billion | ▲ +62.9% |
| 1993 | 0.12x | Skr5.35 Billion | Skr44.20 Billion | ▲ +200.9% |
| 1992 | 0.04x | Skr1.48 Billion | Skr36.84 Billion | ▼ -65.1% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | Skr3.58 Billion | Skr31.04 Billion | — |