Computer Modelling Group Ltd. (CMG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. (CMG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$5.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$105.06 Million) in one year. See Computer Modelling Group Ltd. free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Computer Modelling Group Ltd. across 28 annual periods. Also explore Computer Modelling Group Ltd. annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Computer Modelling Group Ltd. (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Computer Modelling Group Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CMG market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.25x | CA$29.92 Million | CA$118.85 Million | ▼ -27.0% |
| 2024 | 0.35x | CA$36.08 Million | CA$104.56 Million | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2023 | 0.31x | CA$25.88 Million | CA$84.68 Million | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2022 | 0.37x | CA$28.71 Million | CA$78.43 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2021 | 0.33x | CA$26.43 Million | CA$79.07 Million | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | CA$20.53 Million | CA$82.50 Million | ▼ -54.2% |
| 2019 | 0.54x | CA$23.39 Million | CA$43.05 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2018 | 0.72x | CA$30.53 Million | CA$42.43 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2017 | 0.60x | CA$28.84 Million | CA$48.01 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2016 | 0.75x | CA$31.66 Million | CA$42.16 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2015 | 0.95x | CA$40.72 Million | CA$43.00 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2014 | 0.89x | CA$32.86 Million | CA$37.10 Million | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2013 | 0.88x | CA$28.07 Million | CA$32.01 Million | ▼ -16.3% |
| 2012 | 1.05x | CA$30.18 Million | CA$28.81 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2011 | 1.20x | CA$27.52 Million | CA$22.92 Million | ▲ +153.9% |
| 2010 | 0.47x | CA$9.20 Million | CA$19.46 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2009 | 1.06x | CA$21.58 Million | CA$20.38 Million | ▲ +39.8% |
| 2008 | 0.76x | CA$10.11 Million | CA$13.35 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2007 | 0.57x | CA$6.71 Million | CA$11.78 Million | ▲ +26.3% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | CA$4.41 Million | CA$9.78 Million | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | CA$3.08 Million | CA$7.07 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2004 | 0.70x | CA$3.91 Million | CA$5.58 Million | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2003 | 0.67x | CA$3.12 Million | CA$4.64 Million | ▲ +245.9% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | CA$786.48K | CA$4.04 Million | ▼ -59.8% |
| 2001 | 0.48x | CA$2.14 Million | CA$4.41 Million | ▲ +691.7% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | CA$300.00K | CA$4.90 Million | ▲ +112.2% |
| 1999 | -0.50x | CA$-2.30 Million | CA$4.60 Million | ▲ +46.4% |
| 1998 | -0.93x | CA$-2.80 Million | CA$3.00 Million | — |