Computer Modelling Group Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Computer Modelling Group Ltd. (CMG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-4.25 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$104.20 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Computer Modelling Group Ltd. to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Computer Modelling Group Ltd. (1998–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Computer Modelling Group Ltd. from 1998 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Computer Modelling Group Ltd. across 29 annual periods. Check Computer Modelling Group Ltd. investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2026)
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Computer Modelling Group Ltd.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CMG cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.26x | CA$31.27 Million | CA$118.97 Million | ▲ +4.4% |
| 2025 | 0.25x | CA$29.92 Million | CA$118.85 Million | ▼ -27.0% |
| 2024 | 0.35x | CA$36.08 Million | CA$104.56 Million | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2023 | 0.31x | CA$25.88 Million | CA$84.68 Million | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2022 | 0.37x | CA$28.71 Million | CA$78.43 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2021 | 0.33x | CA$26.43 Million | CA$79.07 Million | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | CA$20.53 Million | CA$82.50 Million | ▼ -54.2% |
| 2019 | 0.54x | CA$23.39 Million | CA$43.05 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2018 | 0.72x | CA$30.53 Million | CA$42.43 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2017 | 0.60x | CA$28.84 Million | CA$48.01 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2016 | 0.75x | CA$31.66 Million | CA$42.16 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2015 | 0.95x | CA$40.72 Million | CA$43.00 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2014 | 0.89x | CA$32.86 Million | CA$37.10 Million | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2013 | 0.88x | CA$28.07 Million | CA$32.01 Million | ▼ -16.3% |
| 2012 | 1.05x | CA$30.18 Million | CA$28.81 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2011 | 1.20x | CA$27.52 Million | CA$22.92 Million | ▲ +153.9% |
| 2010 | 0.47x | CA$9.20 Million | CA$19.46 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2009 | 1.06x | CA$21.58 Million | CA$20.38 Million | ▲ +39.8% |
| 2008 | 0.76x | CA$10.11 Million | CA$13.35 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2007 | 0.57x | CA$6.71 Million | CA$11.78 Million | ▲ +26.3% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | CA$4.41 Million | CA$9.78 Million | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | CA$3.08 Million | CA$7.07 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2004 | 0.70x | CA$3.91 Million | CA$5.58 Million | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2003 | 0.67x | CA$3.12 Million | CA$4.64 Million | ▲ +245.9% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | CA$786.48K | CA$4.04 Million | ▼ -59.8% |
| 2001 | 0.48x | CA$2.14 Million | CA$4.41 Million | ▲ +691.7% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | CA$300.00K | CA$4.90 Million | ▲ +112.2% |
| 1999 | -0.50x | CA$-2.30 Million | CA$4.60 Million | ▲ +46.4% |
| 1998 | -0.93x | CA$-2.80 Million | CA$3.00 Million | — |