Computer Modelling Group Ltd. (CMG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. (CMG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$5.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$105.06 Million) in one year. Check CMG cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Computer Modelling Group Ltd. across 28 annual periods. Also explore how large is Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Computer Modelling Group Ltd. (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Computer Modelling Group Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Computer Modelling Group Ltd. market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.25x | CA$29.92 Million | CA$118.85 Million | ▼ -27.0% |
| 2024 | 0.35x | CA$36.08 Million | CA$104.56 Million | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2023 | 0.31x | CA$25.88 Million | CA$84.68 Million | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2022 | 0.37x | CA$28.71 Million | CA$78.43 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2021 | 0.33x | CA$26.43 Million | CA$79.07 Million | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | CA$20.53 Million | CA$82.50 Million | ▼ -54.2% |
| 2019 | 0.54x | CA$23.39 Million | CA$43.05 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2018 | 0.72x | CA$30.53 Million | CA$42.43 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2017 | 0.60x | CA$28.84 Million | CA$48.01 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2016 | 0.75x | CA$31.66 Million | CA$42.16 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2015 | 0.95x | CA$40.72 Million | CA$43.00 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2014 | 0.89x | CA$32.86 Million | CA$37.10 Million | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2013 | 0.88x | CA$28.07 Million | CA$32.01 Million | ▼ -16.3% |
| 2012 | 1.05x | CA$30.18 Million | CA$28.81 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2011 | 1.20x | CA$27.52 Million | CA$22.92 Million | ▲ +153.9% |
| 2010 | 0.47x | CA$9.20 Million | CA$19.46 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2009 | 1.06x | CA$21.58 Million | CA$20.38 Million | ▲ +39.8% |
| 2008 | 0.76x | CA$10.11 Million | CA$13.35 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2007 | 0.57x | CA$6.71 Million | CA$11.78 Million | ▲ +26.3% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | CA$4.41 Million | CA$9.78 Million | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | CA$3.08 Million | CA$7.07 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2004 | 0.70x | CA$3.91 Million | CA$5.58 Million | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2003 | 0.67x | CA$3.12 Million | CA$4.64 Million | ▲ +245.9% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | CA$786.48K | CA$4.04 Million | ▼ -59.8% |
| 2001 | 0.48x | CA$2.14 Million | CA$4.41 Million | ▲ +691.7% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | CA$300.00K | CA$4.90 Million | ▲ +112.2% |
| 1999 | -0.50x | CA$-2.30 Million | CA$4.60 Million | ▲ +46.4% |
| 1998 | -0.93x | CA$-2.80 Million | CA$3.00 Million | — |