Computer Modelling Group Ltd. (CMG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. (CMG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.22x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$26.73 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$118.97 Million) in one year. See Computer Modelling Group Ltd. (CMG) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Computer Modelling Group Ltd. across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Computer Modelling Group Ltd. cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Computer Modelling Group Ltd. (1998–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Computer Modelling Group Ltd.. Check earnings quality score of Computer Modelling Group Ltd. to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.26x | CA$31.27 Million | CA$118.97 Million | ▲ +4.4% |
| 2025 | 0.25x | CA$29.92 Million | CA$118.85 Million | ▼ -27.0% |
| 2024 | 0.35x | CA$36.08 Million | CA$104.56 Million | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2023 | 0.31x | CA$25.88 Million | CA$84.68 Million | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2022 | 0.37x | CA$28.71 Million | CA$78.43 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2021 | 0.33x | CA$26.43 Million | CA$79.07 Million | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | CA$20.53 Million | CA$82.50 Million | ▼ -54.2% |
| 2019 | 0.54x | CA$23.39 Million | CA$43.05 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2018 | 0.72x | CA$30.53 Million | CA$42.43 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2017 | 0.60x | CA$28.84 Million | CA$48.01 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2016 | 0.75x | CA$31.66 Million | CA$42.16 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2015 | 0.95x | CA$40.72 Million | CA$43.00 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2014 | 0.89x | CA$32.86 Million | CA$37.10 Million | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2013 | 0.88x | CA$28.07 Million | CA$32.01 Million | ▼ -16.3% |
| 2012 | 1.05x | CA$30.18 Million | CA$28.81 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2011 | 1.20x | CA$27.52 Million | CA$22.92 Million | ▲ +153.9% |
| 2010 | 0.47x | CA$9.20 Million | CA$19.46 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2009 | 1.06x | CA$21.58 Million | CA$20.38 Million | ▲ +39.8% |
| 2008 | 0.76x | CA$10.11 Million | CA$13.35 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2007 | 0.57x | CA$6.71 Million | CA$11.78 Million | ▲ +26.3% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | CA$4.41 Million | CA$9.78 Million | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | CA$3.08 Million | CA$7.07 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2004 | 0.70x | CA$3.91 Million | CA$5.58 Million | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2003 | 0.67x | CA$3.12 Million | CA$4.64 Million | ▲ +245.9% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | CA$786.48K | CA$4.04 Million | ▼ -59.8% |
| 2001 | 0.48x | CA$2.14 Million | CA$4.41 Million | ▲ +691.7% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | CA$300.00K | CA$4.90 Million | ▲ +112.2% |
| 1999 | -0.50x | CA$-2.30 Million | CA$4.60 Million | ▲ +46.4% |
| 1998 | -0.93x | CA$-2.80 Million | CA$3.00 Million | — |