Kelso Technologies Inc (KLS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kelso Technologies Inc (KLS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.22x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$353.33K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.62 Million) in one year. Check Kelso Technologies Inc (KLS) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kelso Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kelso Technologies Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Kelso Technologies Inc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kelso Technologies Inc (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kelso Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Kelso Technologies Inc (KLS) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.17x | CA$-393.88K | CA$2.34 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2023 | -0.28x | CA$-275.25K | CA$983.02K | ▼ -221.6% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | CA$314.41K | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +121.1% |
| 2021 | -1.09x | CA$-1.82 Million | CA$1.67 Million | ▲ +26.4% |
| 2020 | -1.48x | CA$-1.56 Million | CA$1.06 Million | ▼ -177.1% |
| 2019 | 1.92x | CA$3.62 Million | CA$1.89 Million | ▲ +182.6% |
| 2018 | 0.68x | CA$1.21 Million | CA$1.78 Million | ▲ +166.6% |
| 2017 | -1.02x | CA$-1.63 Million | CA$1.60 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2016 | -0.89x | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$1.28 Million | ▲ +50.5% |
| 2015 | -1.81x | CA$-4.61 Million | CA$2.55 Million | ▼ -249.7% |
| 2014 | 1.21x | CA$4.95 Million | CA$4.10 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 2013 | 3.25x | CA$1.58 Million | CA$486.15K | ▲ +143.2% |
| 2012 | -7.51x | CA$-2.13 Million | CA$283.04K | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2011 | -5.46x | CA$-1.47 Million | CA$269.07K | ▼ -155.1% |
| 2010 | -2.14x | CA$-769.89K | CA$359.97K | ▼ -515.6% |
| 2009 | -0.35x | CA$-291.91K | CA$840.17K | ▲ +51.2% |
| 2008 | -0.71x | CA$-367.84K | CA$516.20K | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2007 | -1.46x | CA$-358.58K | CA$245.07K | ▲ +38.5% |
| 2006 | -2.38x | CA$-433.75K | CA$182.27K | ▲ +90.2% |
| 2005 | -24.23x | CA$-612.60K | CA$25.28K | ▼ -293.9% |
| 2004 | -6.15x | CA$-463.02K | CA$75.26K | ▼ -47.8% |
| 2003 | -4.16x | CA$-489.46K | CA$117.57K | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2002 | -4.69x | CA$-349.52K | CA$74.57K | ▼ -640.6% |
| 2001 | -0.63x | CA$-97.77K | CA$154.49K | ▲ +73.7% |
| 2000 | -2.41x | CA$-298.69K | CA$124.08K | ▼ -560.8% |
| 1999 | -0.36x | CA$-110.01K | CA$302.00K | ▲ +92.8% |
| 1998 | -5.05x | CA$-299.50K | CA$59.31K | ▼ -975.0% |
| 1997 | -0.47x | CA$-24.86K | CA$52.93K | — |