Kelso Technologies Inc (KLS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kelso Technologies Inc (KLS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.22x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$353.33K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.62 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Kelso Technologies Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kelso Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kelso Technologies Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore KLS shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kelso Technologies Inc (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kelso Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Kelso Technologies Inc (KLS) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.17x | CA$-393.88K | CA$2.34 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2023 | -0.28x | CA$-275.25K | CA$983.02K | ▼ -221.6% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | CA$314.41K | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +121.1% |
| 2021 | -1.09x | CA$-1.82 Million | CA$1.67 Million | ▲ +26.4% |
| 2020 | -1.48x | CA$-1.56 Million | CA$1.06 Million | ▼ -177.1% |
| 2019 | 1.92x | CA$3.62 Million | CA$1.89 Million | ▲ +182.6% |
| 2018 | 0.68x | CA$1.21 Million | CA$1.78 Million | ▲ +166.6% |
| 2017 | -1.02x | CA$-1.63 Million | CA$1.60 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2016 | -0.89x | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$1.28 Million | ▲ +50.5% |
| 2015 | -1.81x | CA$-4.61 Million | CA$2.55 Million | ▼ -249.7% |
| 2014 | 1.21x | CA$4.95 Million | CA$4.10 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 2013 | 3.25x | CA$1.58 Million | CA$486.15K | ▲ +143.2% |
| 2012 | -7.51x | CA$-2.13 Million | CA$283.04K | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2011 | -5.46x | CA$-1.47 Million | CA$269.07K | ▼ -155.1% |
| 2010 | -2.14x | CA$-769.89K | CA$359.97K | ▼ -515.6% |
| 2009 | -0.35x | CA$-291.91K | CA$840.17K | ▲ +51.2% |
| 2008 | -0.71x | CA$-367.84K | CA$516.20K | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2007 | -1.46x | CA$-358.58K | CA$245.07K | ▲ +38.5% |
| 2006 | -2.38x | CA$-433.75K | CA$182.27K | ▲ +90.2% |
| 2005 | -24.23x | CA$-612.60K | CA$25.28K | ▼ -293.9% |
| 2004 | -6.15x | CA$-463.02K | CA$75.26K | ▼ -47.8% |
| 2003 | -4.16x | CA$-489.46K | CA$117.57K | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2002 | -4.69x | CA$-349.52K | CA$74.57K | ▼ -640.6% |
| 2001 | -0.63x | CA$-97.77K | CA$154.49K | ▲ +73.7% |
| 2000 | -2.41x | CA$-298.69K | CA$124.08K | ▼ -560.8% |
| 1999 | -0.36x | CA$-110.01K | CA$302.00K | ▲ +92.8% |
| 1998 | -5.05x | CA$-299.50K | CA$59.31K | ▼ -975.0% |
| 1997 | -0.47x | CA$-24.86K | CA$52.93K | — |