Kelso Technologies Inc (KLS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kelso Technologies Inc (KLS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.22x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$353.33K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.62 Million) in one year. See Kelso Technologies Inc leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kelso Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kelso Technologies Inc across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Kelso Technologies Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kelso Technologies Inc (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kelso Technologies Inc. Check earnings quality score of Kelso Technologies Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.17x | CA$-393.88K | CA$2.34 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2023 | -0.28x | CA$-275.25K | CA$983.02K | ▼ -221.6% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | CA$314.41K | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +121.1% |
| 2021 | -1.09x | CA$-1.82 Million | CA$1.67 Million | ▲ +26.4% |
| 2020 | -1.48x | CA$-1.56 Million | CA$1.06 Million | ▼ -177.1% |
| 2019 | 1.92x | CA$3.62 Million | CA$1.89 Million | ▲ +182.6% |
| 2018 | 0.68x | CA$1.21 Million | CA$1.78 Million | ▲ +166.6% |
| 2017 | -1.02x | CA$-1.63 Million | CA$1.60 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2016 | -0.89x | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$1.28 Million | ▲ +50.5% |
| 2015 | -1.81x | CA$-4.61 Million | CA$2.55 Million | ▼ -249.7% |
| 2014 | 1.21x | CA$4.95 Million | CA$4.10 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 2013 | 3.25x | CA$1.58 Million | CA$486.15K | ▲ +143.2% |
| 2012 | -7.51x | CA$-2.13 Million | CA$283.04K | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2011 | -5.46x | CA$-1.47 Million | CA$269.07K | ▼ -155.1% |
| 2010 | -2.14x | CA$-769.89K | CA$359.97K | ▼ -515.6% |
| 2009 | -0.35x | CA$-291.91K | CA$840.17K | ▲ +51.2% |
| 2008 | -0.71x | CA$-367.84K | CA$516.20K | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2007 | -1.46x | CA$-358.58K | CA$245.07K | ▲ +38.5% |
| 2006 | -2.38x | CA$-433.75K | CA$182.27K | ▲ +90.2% |
| 2005 | -24.23x | CA$-612.60K | CA$25.28K | ▼ -293.9% |
| 2004 | -6.15x | CA$-463.02K | CA$75.26K | ▼ -47.8% |
| 2003 | -4.16x | CA$-489.46K | CA$117.57K | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2002 | -4.69x | CA$-349.52K | CA$74.57K | ▼ -640.6% |
| 2001 | -0.63x | CA$-97.77K | CA$154.49K | ▲ +73.7% |
| 2000 | -2.41x | CA$-298.69K | CA$124.08K | ▼ -560.8% |
| 1999 | -0.36x | CA$-110.01K | CA$302.00K | ▲ +92.8% |
| 1998 | -5.05x | CA$-299.50K | CA$59.31K | ▼ -975.0% |
| 1997 | -0.47x | CA$-24.86K | CA$52.93K | — |