Kelso Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kelso Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Kelso Technologies Inc (KLS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.22x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$353.33K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.62 Million) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Kelso Technologies Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Kelso Technologies Inc (1997–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Kelso Technologies Inc from 1997 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Kelso Technologies Inc across 28 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Kelso Technologies Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Kelso Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2024)
Kelso Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kelso Technologies Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see KLS cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.17x | CA$-393.88K | CA$2.34 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2023 | -0.28x | CA$-275.25K | CA$983.02K | ▼ -221.6% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | CA$314.41K | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +121.1% |
| 2021 | -1.09x | CA$-1.82 Million | CA$1.67 Million | ▲ +26.4% |
| 2020 | -1.48x | CA$-1.56 Million | CA$1.06 Million | ▼ -177.1% |
| 2019 | 1.92x | CA$3.62 Million | CA$1.89 Million | ▲ +182.6% |
| 2018 | 0.68x | CA$1.21 Million | CA$1.78 Million | ▲ +166.6% |
| 2017 | -1.02x | CA$-1.63 Million | CA$1.60 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2016 | -0.89x | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$1.28 Million | ▲ +50.5% |
| 2015 | -1.81x | CA$-4.61 Million | CA$2.55 Million | ▼ -249.7% |
| 2014 | 1.21x | CA$4.95 Million | CA$4.10 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 2013 | 3.25x | CA$1.58 Million | CA$486.15K | ▲ +143.2% |
| 2012 | -7.51x | CA$-2.13 Million | CA$283.04K | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2011 | -5.46x | CA$-1.47 Million | CA$269.07K | ▼ -155.1% |
| 2010 | -2.14x | CA$-769.89K | CA$359.97K | ▼ -515.6% |
| 2009 | -0.35x | CA$-291.91K | CA$840.17K | ▲ +51.2% |
| 2008 | -0.71x | CA$-367.84K | CA$516.20K | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2007 | -1.46x | CA$-358.58K | CA$245.07K | ▲ +38.5% |
| 2006 | -2.38x | CA$-433.75K | CA$182.27K | ▲ +90.2% |
| 2005 | -24.23x | CA$-612.60K | CA$25.28K | ▼ -293.9% |
| 2004 | -6.15x | CA$-463.02K | CA$75.26K | ▼ -47.8% |
| 2003 | -4.16x | CA$-489.46K | CA$117.57K | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2002 | -4.69x | CA$-349.52K | CA$74.57K | ▼ -640.6% |
| 2001 | -0.63x | CA$-97.77K | CA$154.49K | ▲ +73.7% |
| 2000 | -2.41x | CA$-298.69K | CA$124.08K | ▼ -560.8% |
| 1999 | -0.36x | CA$-110.01K | CA$302.00K | ▲ +92.8% |
| 1998 | -5.05x | CA$-299.50K | CA$59.31K | ▼ -975.0% |
| 1997 | -0.47x | CA$-24.86K | CA$52.93K | — |