Kelso Technologies Inc (KLS) — Net Asset Quality Index
Kelso Technologies Inc (KLS) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 75.1% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$6.52 Million minus total liabilities of CA$1.62 Million yields net assets of CA$4.90 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See Kelso Technologies Inc (KLS) defensive interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Kelso Technologies Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1997–2024)
This chart shows how Kelso Technologies Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 28 annual periods from 1997 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 75.1%, representing net assets of CA$4.90 Million against total assets of CA$6.52 Million CAD. Explore Kelso Technologies Inc operating cash flow efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Kelso Technologies Inc (1997–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Kelso Technologies Inc from 1997 to 2024, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Kelso Technologies Inc stock valuation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 64.4% | CA$4.23 Million | CA$6.57 Million | CA$2.34 Million | ▼ -25.5 pp |
| 2023 | 89.9% | CA$8.72 Million | CA$9.70 Million | CA$983.02K | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2022 | 88.8% | CA$10.78 Million | CA$12.15 Million | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2021 | 87.8% | CA$12.06 Million | CA$13.73 Million | CA$1.67 Million | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2020 | 91.2% | CA$10.96 Million | CA$12.02 Million | CA$1.06 Million | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 2019 | 86.3% | CA$11.85 Million | CA$13.73 Million | CA$1.89 Million | ▲ +4.2 pp |
| 2018 | 82.1% | CA$8.17 Million | CA$9.94 Million | CA$1.78 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2017 | 82.5% | CA$7.57 Million | CA$9.17 Million | CA$1.60 Million | ▼ -7.7 pp |
| 2016 | 90.2% | CA$11.77 Million | CA$13.05 Million | CA$1.28 Million | ▲ +6.0 pp |
| 2015 | 84.2% | CA$13.61 Million | CA$16.16 Million | CA$2.55 Million | ▲ +4.0 pp |
| 2014 | 80.2% | CA$16.60 Million | CA$20.70 Million | CA$4.10 Million | ▼ -14.6 pp |
| 2013 | 94.8% | CA$8.80 Million | CA$9.28 Million | CA$486.15K | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2012 | 93.4% | CA$4.04 Million | CA$4.32 Million | CA$283.04K | ▲ +4.0 pp |
| 2011 | 89.5% | CA$2.29 Million | CA$2.56 Million | CA$269.07K | ▲ +64.3 pp |
| 2010 | 25.2% | CA$121.53K | CA$481.50K | CA$359.97K | ▲ +5893.6 pp |
| 2009 | -5868.4% | CA$-826.09K | CA$14.08K | CA$840.17K | ▼ -4462.7 pp |
| 2008 | -1405.6% | CA$-481.92K | CA$34.28K | CA$516.20K | ▼ -810.3 pp |
| 2007 | -595.4% | CA$-209.83K | CA$35.24K | CA$245.07K | ▼ -258.6 pp |
| 2006 | -336.8% | CA$-140.54K | CA$41.73K | CA$182.27K | ▼ -410.4 pp |
| 2005 | 73.6% | CA$70.59K | CA$95.87K | CA$25.28K | ▲ +86.0 pp |
| 2004 | -12.4% | CA$-8.28K | CA$66.98K | CA$75.26K | ▲ +5.7 pp |
| 2003 | -18.1% | CA$-18.00K | CA$99.58K | CA$117.57K | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 2002 | -14.1% | CA$-9.24K | CA$65.33K | CA$74.57K | ▲ +2063.7 pp |
| 2001 | -2077.9% | CA$-147.40K | CA$7.09K | CA$154.49K | ▼ -1740.2 pp |
| 2000 | -337.7% | CA$-95.73K | CA$28.35K | CA$124.08K | ▲ +1240.2 pp |
| 1999 | -1577.8% | CA$-284.00K | CA$18.00K | CA$302.00K | ▼ -1520.6 pp |
| 1998 | -57.2% | CA$-21.58K | CA$37.73K | CA$59.31K | ▼ -121.9 pp |
| 1997 | 64.7% | CA$96.80K | CA$149.73K | CA$52.93K | — |