Silergy Corp (6415) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: 0.02x

Silergy Corp (6415) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of NT$120.07 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (NT$6.42 Billion) in one year. See how much free cash does Silergy Corp generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.02x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

NT$120.07 Million
TWD

Total Liabilities

NT$6.42 Billion
TWD

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Silergy Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2010–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Silergy Corp across 16 annual periods. Also explore 6415 net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Silergy Corp (2010–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Silergy Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see 6415 stock market capitalisation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (TWD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.36x NT$2.30 Billion NT$6.42 Billion ▼ -32.1%
2024 0.53x NT$2.54 Billion NT$4.81 Billion ▼ -60.7%
2023 1.34x NT$3.87 Billion NT$2.88 Billion ▼ -27.4%
2022 1.85x NT$7.00 Billion NT$3.78 Billion ▼ -29.1%
2021 2.61x NT$6.43 Billion NT$2.47 Billion ▼ -0.7%
2020 2.63x NT$3.98 Billion NT$1.52 Billion ▲ +34.4%
2019 1.95x NT$2.80 Billion NT$1.43 Billion ▼ -25.9%
2018 2.64x NT$2.48 Billion NT$939.98 Million ▲ +89.6%
2017 1.39x NT$2.11 Billion NT$1.52 Billion ▲ +120.2%
2016 0.63x NT$1.66 Billion NT$2.63 Billion ▼ -46.3%
2015 1.18x NT$855.18 Million NT$727.39 Million ▼ -23.9%
2014 1.55x NT$621.22 Million NT$401.92 Million ▼ -31.7%
2013 2.26x NT$538.55 Million NT$238.02 Million ▲ +183.5%
2012 0.80x NT$141.32 Million NT$177.05 Million ▲ +3361.1%
2011 0.02x NT$19.02 Million NT$824.85 Million ▲ +109.4%
2010 -0.24x NT$-71.90 Million NT$293.65 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.