Eastfield Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Eastfield Resources Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Eastfield Resources Ltd (ETF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -2.51x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-222.03K could theoretically repay -3% of its total liabilities (CA$88.52K) in one year. Check Eastfield Resources Ltd cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Eastfield Resources Ltd (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Eastfield Resources Ltd from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Eastfield Resources Ltd across 28 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Eastfield Resources Ltd to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Eastfield Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Eastfield Resources Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Eastfield Resources Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Eastfield Resources Ltd cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.44x | CA$-112.79K | CA$257.23K | ▲ +37.2% |
| 2024 | -0.70x | CA$-217.71K | CA$311.75K | ▼ -88.8% |
| 2023 | -0.37x | CA$-149.41K | CA$403.86K | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2022 | -0.25x | CA$-127.22K | CA$500.26K | ▼ -58.2% |
| 2021 | -0.16x | CA$-88.35K | CA$549.53K | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2020 | -0.17x | CA$-100.29K | CA$597.68K | ▲ +85.4% |
| 2019 | -1.15x | CA$-159.00K | CA$138.31K | ▲ +60.2% |
| 2018 | -2.89x | CA$-140.91K | CA$48.78K | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2017 | -2.79x | CA$-140.38K | CA$50.26K | ▼ -369.6% |
| 2016 | -0.59x | CA$-66.02K | CA$110.97K | ▲ +71.2% |
| 2015 | -2.07x | CA$-143.90K | CA$69.55K | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2014 | -1.79x | CA$-113.99K | CA$63.55K | ▼ -104.9% |
| 2013 | 36.76x | CA$2.17 Million | CA$58.93K | ▲ +20863.8% |
| 2012 | -0.18x | CA$-150.92K | CA$852.42K | ▲ +94.2% |
| 2011 | -3.03x | CA$-181.46K | CA$59.93K | ▼ -25.6% |
| 2010 | -2.41x | CA$-135.87K | CA$56.38K | ▼ -511.7% |
| 2009 | -0.39x | CA$-26.02K | CA$66.06K | ▼ -211.3% |
| 2008 | 0.35x | CA$77.41K | CA$218.72K | ▲ +132.0% |
| 2007 | -1.11x | CA$-176.22K | CA$159.35K | ▼ -114.5% |
| 2006 | -0.52x | CA$-72.91K | CA$141.41K | ▲ +65.7% |
| 2005 | -1.50x | CA$-177.78K | CA$118.35K | ▼ -106.9% |
| 2004 | -0.73x | CA$-45.81K | CA$63.11K | ▲ +94.1% |
| 2003 | -12.28x | CA$-181.91K | CA$14.81K | ▲ +17.8% |
| 2002 | -14.95x | CA$-206.06K | CA$13.79K | ▼ -2550.3% |
| 2001 | -0.56x | CA$-78.04K | CA$138.39K | ▲ +53.9% |
| 2000 | -1.22x | CA$-28.41K | CA$23.23K | ▲ +88.2% |
| 1999 | -10.40x | CA$-166.93K | CA$16.05K | ▼ -230.8% |
| 1998 | -3.14x | CA$-206.98K | CA$65.83K | — |