Eastfield Resources Ltd (ETF) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Eastfield Resources Ltd (ETF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -2.51x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-222.03K could theoretically repay -3% of its total liabilities (CA$88.52K) in one year. See ETF cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Eastfield Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Eastfield Resources Ltd across 28 annual periods. Also explore ETF year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Eastfield Resources Ltd (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Eastfield Resources Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Eastfield Resources Ltd (ETF) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.44x | CA$-112.79K | CA$257.23K | ▲ +37.2% |
| 2024 | -0.70x | CA$-217.71K | CA$311.75K | ▼ -88.8% |
| 2023 | -0.37x | CA$-149.41K | CA$403.86K | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2022 | -0.25x | CA$-127.22K | CA$500.26K | ▼ -58.2% |
| 2021 | -0.16x | CA$-88.35K | CA$549.53K | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2020 | -0.17x | CA$-100.29K | CA$597.68K | ▲ +85.4% |
| 2019 | -1.15x | CA$-159.00K | CA$138.31K | ▲ +60.2% |
| 2018 | -2.89x | CA$-140.91K | CA$48.78K | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2017 | -2.79x | CA$-140.38K | CA$50.26K | ▼ -369.6% |
| 2016 | -0.59x | CA$-66.02K | CA$110.97K | ▲ +71.2% |
| 2015 | -2.07x | CA$-143.90K | CA$69.55K | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2014 | -1.79x | CA$-113.99K | CA$63.55K | ▼ -104.9% |
| 2013 | 36.76x | CA$2.17 Million | CA$58.93K | ▲ +20863.8% |
| 2012 | -0.18x | CA$-150.92K | CA$852.42K | ▲ +94.2% |
| 2011 | -3.03x | CA$-181.46K | CA$59.93K | ▼ -25.6% |
| 2010 | -2.41x | CA$-135.87K | CA$56.38K | ▼ -511.7% |
| 2009 | -0.39x | CA$-26.02K | CA$66.06K | ▼ -211.3% |
| 2008 | 0.35x | CA$77.41K | CA$218.72K | ▲ +132.0% |
| 2007 | -1.11x | CA$-176.22K | CA$159.35K | ▼ -114.5% |
| 2006 | -0.52x | CA$-72.91K | CA$141.41K | ▲ +65.7% |
| 2005 | -1.50x | CA$-177.78K | CA$118.35K | ▼ -106.9% |
| 2004 | -0.73x | CA$-45.81K | CA$63.11K | ▲ +94.1% |
| 2003 | -12.28x | CA$-181.91K | CA$14.81K | ▲ +17.8% |
| 2002 | -14.95x | CA$-206.06K | CA$13.79K | ▼ -2550.3% |
| 2001 | -0.56x | CA$-78.04K | CA$138.39K | ▲ +53.9% |
| 2000 | -1.22x | CA$-28.41K | CA$23.23K | ▲ +88.2% |
| 1999 | -10.40x | CA$-166.93K | CA$16.05K | ▼ -230.8% |
| 1998 | -3.14x | CA$-206.98K | CA$65.83K | — |