Eastfield Resources Ltd Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Eastfield Resources Ltd tangible net worth ratio. Eastfield Resources Ltd (ETF) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of November 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$0.00) from net assets (CA$2.36 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check how strategically is Eastfield Resources Ltd's equity deployed to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Eastfield Resources Ltd (1998–2025)
Tangible net worth ratio of Eastfield Resources Ltd from 1998 to 2025. This chart shows how Eastfield Resources Ltd's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 28 annual periods from 1998 to 2025. As of November 2025, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of CA$2.36 Million with intangible assets of CA$0.00 CAD. See ETF working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Eastfield Resources Ltd Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Eastfield Resources Ltd tangible net worth ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Eastfield Resources Ltd from 1998 to 2025, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Eastfield Resources Ltd stock valuation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | CA$1.26 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.52 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2024 | 100.0% | CA$1.70 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.01 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | CA$2.58 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.98 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | CA$3.28 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$3.78 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | CA$4.00 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$4.55 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | CA$2.01 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.61 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 100.0% | CA$2.61 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.75 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | CA$2.55 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.60 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | CA$2.56 Million | CA$443.00 | CA$2.61 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | CA$2.24 Million | CA$0.42 | CA$2.35 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | CA$2.47 Million | CA$0.42 | CA$2.54 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | CA$2.57 Million | CA$0.35 | CA$2.63 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | CA$2.86 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.92 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | CA$798.78K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.65 Million | ▲ +8.2 pp |
| 2011 | 91.8% | CA$1.02 Million | CA$83.21K | CA$1.08 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2010 | 91.9% | CA$1.04 Million | CA$83.59K | CA$1.09 Million | ▼ -8.1 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | CA$1.02 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.09 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$4.21 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$4.43 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | CA$3.96 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$4.12 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | CA$4.00 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$4.14 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | CA$4.10 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$4.22 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | CA$3.56 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$3.62 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | CA$2.27 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.28 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | CA$2.02 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.03 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | CA$962.80K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.10 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | CA$1.49 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.51 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | CA$1.40 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.42 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | CA$993.72K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.06 Million | — |