Eastfield Resources Ltd (ETF) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Eastfield Resources Ltd (ETF) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 45.5% as of November 2025. Working capital of CA$1.07 Million (current assets of CA$1.16 Million minus current liabilities of CA$88.25K) is measured against net assets of CA$2.36 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See ETF equity financing ratio to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Eastfield Resources Ltd Working Capital to Net Assets (1998–2025)
This chart shows how Eastfield Resources Ltd's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 28 annual periods from 1998 to 2025. As of November 2025, the ratio stands at 45.5%, reflecting working capital of CA$1.07 Million against net assets of CA$2.36 Million CAD. Check Eastfield Resources Ltd tangible equity quality to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Eastfield Resources Ltd (1998–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Eastfield Resources Ltd from 1998 to 2025, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and the full company profile, see ETF company net worth.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.2% | CA$27.41K | CA$1.26 Million | CA$284.64K | CA$257.23K | ▼ -6.9 pp |
| 2024 | 9.0% | CA$153.35K | CA$1.70 Million | CA$423.18K | CA$269.83K | ▲ +10.5 pp |
| 2023 | -1.4% | CA$-36.23K | CA$2.58 Million | CA$202.26K | CA$238.49K | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2022 | -2.6% | CA$-83.90K | CA$3.28 Million | CA$142.16K | CA$226.06K | ▼ -5.6 pp |
| 2021 | 3.0% | CA$120.59K | CA$4.00 Million | CA$297.46K | CA$176.87K | ▼ -6.6 pp |
| 2020 | 9.6% | CA$193.26K | CA$2.01 Million | CA$353.21K | CA$159.95K | ▼ -12.0 pp |
| 2019 | 21.6% | CA$565.87K | CA$2.61 Million | CA$704.18K | CA$138.31K | ▼ -32.8 pp |
| 2018 | 54.5% | CA$1.39 Million | CA$2.55 Million | CA$1.43 Million | CA$42.28K | ▲ +11.5 pp |
| 2017 | 42.9% | CA$1.10 Million | CA$2.56 Million | CA$1.14 Million | CA$43.76K | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2016 | 39.3% | CA$881.57K | CA$2.24 Million | CA$986.04K | CA$104.47K | ▼ -17.0 pp |
| 2015 | 56.3% | CA$1.39 Million | CA$2.47 Million | CA$1.46 Million | CA$63.05K | ▼ -11.6 pp |
| 2014 | 67.9% | CA$1.74 Million | CA$2.57 Million | CA$1.80 Million | CA$57.05K | ▼ -12.5 pp |
| 2013 | 80.4% | CA$2.30 Million | CA$2.86 Million | CA$2.36 Million | CA$52.43K | ▲ +28.7 pp |
| 2012 | 51.8% | CA$413.55K | CA$798.78K | CA$1.26 Million | CA$845.92K | ▲ +3.3 pp |
| 2011 | 48.5% | CA$492.74K | CA$1.02 Million | CA$546.17K | CA$53.43K | ▼ -22.4 pp |
| 2010 | 70.9% | CA$734.93K | CA$1.04 Million | CA$791.31K | CA$56.38K | ▲ +4.1 pp |
| 2009 | 66.8% | CA$684.21K | CA$1.02 Million | CA$730.77K | CA$46.56K | ▲ +43.6 pp |
| 2008 | 23.1% | CA$974.71K | CA$4.21 Million | CA$1.04 Million | CA$61.78K | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2007 | 21.2% | CA$839.91K | CA$3.96 Million | CA$884.58K | CA$44.66K | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2006 | 19.1% | CA$764.98K | CA$4.00 Million | CA$906.38K | CA$141.41K | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2005 | 20.7% | CA$848.06K | CA$4.10 Million | CA$966.41K | CA$118.35K | ▼ -28.8 pp |
| 2004 | 49.5% | CA$1.76 Million | CA$3.56 Million | CA$1.83 Million | CA$63.11K | ▲ +33.9 pp |
| 2003 | 15.6% | CA$353.37K | CA$2.27 Million | CA$368.17K | CA$14.81K | ▼ -9.8 pp |
| 2002 | 25.3% | CA$510.61K | CA$2.02 Million | CA$524.40K | CA$13.79K | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2001 | 23.3% | CA$224.52K | CA$962.80K | CA$362.91K | CA$138.39K | ▲ +18.0 pp |
| 2000 | 5.3% | CA$79.49K | CA$1.49 Million | CA$102.71K | CA$23.23K | ▼ -8.4 pp |
| 1999 | 13.8% | CA$192.92K | CA$1.40 Million | CA$208.97K | CA$16.05K | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 1998 | 17.7% | CA$176.26K | CA$993.72K | CA$242.09K | CA$65.83K | — |