Eastfield Resources Ltd (ETF) — Net Asset Quality Index
Eastfield Resources Ltd (ETF) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 96.4% as of November 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$2.45 Million minus total liabilities of CA$88.52K yields net assets of CA$2.36 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check asset resilience ratio of Eastfield Resources Ltd to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Eastfield Resources Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1998–2025)
This chart shows how Eastfield Resources Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 28 annual periods from 1998 to 2025. As of November 2025, the index stands at 96.4%, representing net assets of CA$2.36 Million against total assets of CA$2.45 Million CAD. See ETF working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Eastfield Resources Ltd (1998–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Eastfield Resources Ltd from 1998 to 2025, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see ETF stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 83.1% | CA$1.26 Million | CA$1.52 Million | CA$257.23K | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2024 | 84.5% | CA$1.70 Million | CA$2.01 Million | CA$311.75K | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2023 | 86.4% | CA$2.58 Million | CA$2.98 Million | CA$403.86K | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2022 | 86.8% | CA$3.28 Million | CA$3.78 Million | CA$500.26K | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2021 | 87.9% | CA$4.00 Million | CA$4.55 Million | CA$549.53K | ▲ +10.8 pp |
| 2020 | 77.1% | CA$2.01 Million | CA$2.61 Million | CA$597.68K | ▼ -17.9 pp |
| 2019 | 95.0% | CA$2.61 Million | CA$2.75 Million | CA$138.31K | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2018 | 98.1% | CA$2.55 Million | CA$2.60 Million | CA$48.78K | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2017 | 98.1% | CA$2.56 Million | CA$2.61 Million | CA$50.26K | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2016 | 95.3% | CA$2.24 Million | CA$2.35 Million | CA$110.97K | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2015 | 97.3% | CA$2.47 Million | CA$2.54 Million | CA$69.55K | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2014 | 97.6% | CA$2.57 Million | CA$2.63 Million | CA$63.55K | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2013 | 98.0% | CA$2.86 Million | CA$2.92 Million | CA$58.93K | ▲ +49.6 pp |
| 2012 | 48.4% | CA$798.78K | CA$1.65 Million | CA$852.42K | ▼ -46.1 pp |
| 2011 | 94.4% | CA$1.02 Million | CA$1.08 Million | CA$59.93K | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2010 | 94.8% | CA$1.04 Million | CA$1.09 Million | CA$56.38K | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2009 | 93.9% | CA$1.02 Million | CA$1.09 Million | CA$66.06K | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2008 | 95.1% | CA$4.21 Million | CA$4.43 Million | CA$218.72K | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2007 | 96.1% | CA$3.96 Million | CA$4.12 Million | CA$159.35K | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2006 | 96.6% | CA$4.00 Million | CA$4.14 Million | CA$141.41K | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2005 | 97.2% | CA$4.10 Million | CA$4.22 Million | CA$118.35K | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2004 | 98.3% | CA$3.56 Million | CA$3.62 Million | CA$63.11K | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2003 | 99.4% | CA$2.27 Million | CA$2.28 Million | CA$14.81K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 99.3% | CA$2.02 Million | CA$2.03 Million | CA$13.79K | ▲ +11.9 pp |
| 2001 | 87.4% | CA$962.80K | CA$1.10 Million | CA$138.39K | ▼ -11.0 pp |
| 2000 | 98.5% | CA$1.49 Million | CA$1.51 Million | CA$23.23K | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 1999 | 98.9% | CA$1.40 Million | CA$1.42 Million | CA$16.05K | ▲ +5.1 pp |
| 1998 | 93.8% | CA$993.72K | CA$1.06 Million | CA$65.83K | — |