Fancamp Exploration Ltd. (FNC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Fancamp Exploration Ltd. (FNC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.12x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-900.71K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$7.70 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Fancamp Exploration Ltd. to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Fancamp Exploration Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Fancamp Exploration Ltd. across 29 annual periods. Also explore Fancamp Exploration Ltd. annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Fancamp Exploration Ltd. (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Fancamp Exploration Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see FNC company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | CA$-142.12K | CA$8.26 Million | ▲ +94.6% |
| 2024 | -0.32x | CA$-2.20 Million | CA$6.92 Million | ▼ -122.0% |
| 2023 | -0.14x | CA$-1.58 Million | CA$11.00 Million | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2022 | -0.84x | CA$-3.75 Million | CA$4.48 Million | ▼ -257.9% |
| 2021 | -0.23x | CA$-1.27 Million | CA$5.43 Million | ▲ +51.6% |
| 2020 | -0.48x | CA$-2.02 Million | CA$4.17 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2019 | -0.44x | CA$-2.22 Million | CA$5.00 Million | ▼ -268.1% |
| 2018 | -0.12x | CA$-501.44K | CA$4.16 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2017 | -0.13x | CA$-470.17K | CA$3.49 Million | ▲ +31.8% |
| 2016 | -0.20x | CA$-615.58K | CA$3.11 Million | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2015 | -0.18x | CA$-492.55K | CA$2.78 Million | ▲ +59.2% |
| 2014 | -0.43x | CA$-1.59 Million | CA$3.67 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2013 | -0.48x | CA$-2.32 Million | CA$4.81 Million | ▼ -1003.4% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | CA$359.63K | CA$6.73 Million | ▲ +151.1% |
| 2011 | -0.10x | CA$-516.54K | CA$4.94 Million | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2010 | -0.21x | CA$-363.54K | CA$1.69 Million | ▼ -154.4% |
| 2009 | 0.39x | CA$467.41K | CA$1.18 Million | ▼ -70.4% |
| 2008 | 1.33x | CA$255.62K | CA$191.70K | ▲ +43.7% |
| 2007 | 0.93x | CA$178.09K | CA$191.93K | ▲ +164.6% |
| 2006 | -1.44x | CA$-231.67K | CA$161.35K | ▼ -241.5% |
| 2005 | -0.42x | CA$-74.68K | CA$177.60K | ▼ -102.7% |
| 2004 | -0.21x | CA$-205.27K | CA$989.71K | ▼ -685.1% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | CA$-26.50K | CA$1.00 Million | ▲ +74.7% |
| 2002 | -0.10x | CA$-88.95K | CA$852.66K | ▼ -1306.0% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | CA$-8.94K | CA$1.21 Million | ▲ +99.6% |
| 2000 | -1.70x | CA$-1.90 Million | CA$1.12 Million | ▼ -196.7% |
| 1999 | -0.57x | CA$-400.00K | CA$700.00K | ▲ +60.0% |
| 1998 | -1.43x | CA$-1.00 Million | CA$700.00K | ▼ -42.9% |
| 1997 | -1.00x | CA$-500.00K | CA$500.00K | — |