Oculus VisionTech Inc (OVT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Oculus VisionTech Inc (OVT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-6.66K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$769.98K) in one year. See OVT FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Oculus VisionTech Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Oculus VisionTech Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore OVT net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Oculus VisionTech Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Oculus VisionTech Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Oculus VisionTech Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | CA$6.87K | CA$769.98K | ▲ +102.7% |
| 2024 | -0.33x | CA$-146.54K | CA$449.01K | ▲ +83.2% |
| 2023 | -1.95x | CA$-533.02K | CA$273.72K | ▲ +60.3% |
| 2022 | -4.91x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$302.42K | ▲ +55.4% |
| 2021 | -11.01x | CA$-1.35 Million | CA$122.62K | ▼ -137.4% |
| 2020 | -4.64x | CA$-779.47K | CA$168.07K | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2019 | -5.91x | CA$-799.82K | CA$135.42K | ▼ -78784.7% |
| 2018 | 0.01x | CA$5.57K | CA$742.30K | ▲ +167.9% |
| 2017 | -0.01x | CA$-6.42K | CA$581.13K | ▲ +97.6% |
| 2016 | -0.46x | CA$-180.67K | CA$390.13K | ▲ +97.0% |
| 2015 | -15.19x | CA$-938.10K | CA$61.75K | ▼ -365460.2% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | CA$-5.00K | CA$1.20 Million | ▼ -658.4% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | CA$-527.00 | CA$961.69K | ▲ +99.5% |
| 2012 | -0.11x | CA$-92.42K | CA$841.91K | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2011 | -0.81x | CA$-484.77K | CA$598.67K | ▼ -183.3% |
| 2010 | -0.29x | CA$-133.66K | CA$467.67K | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2009 | -0.37x | CA$-274.30K | CA$745.23K | ▲ +70.8% |
| 2008 | -1.26x | CA$-534.47K | CA$424.13K | ▲ +67.8% |
| 2007 | -3.91x | CA$-1.09 Million | CA$277.68K | ▼ -70.7% |
| 2006 | -2.29x | CA$-747.01K | CA$325.90K | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2005 | -3.07x | CA$-967.86K | CA$314.89K | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2004 | -2.44x | CA$-1.36 Million | CA$556.87K | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2003 | -1.66x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$649.64K | ▼ -105.5% |
| 2002 | -0.81x | CA$-919.00K | CA$1.14 Million | ▲ +68.9% |
| 2001 | -2.60x | CA$-2.71 Million | CA$1.04 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2000 | -2.37x | CA$-1.91 Million | CA$804.67K | ▼ -24.7% |
| 1999 | -1.90x | CA$-1.31 Million | CA$690.45K | ▼ -72.7% |
| 1998 | -1.10x | CA$-714.89K | CA$649.90K | ▼ -23.7% |
| 1997 | -0.89x | CA$-559.05K | CA$628.93K | — |