Oculus VisionTech Inc (OVT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Oculus VisionTech Inc (OVT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$734.00 could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$829.23K) in one year. Explore Oculus VisionTech Inc long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Oculus VisionTech Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Oculus VisionTech Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore Oculus VisionTech Inc asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Oculus VisionTech Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Oculus VisionTech Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Oculus VisionTech Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | CA$6.87K | CA$769.98K | ▲ +102.7% |
| 2024 | -0.33x | CA$-146.54K | CA$449.01K | ▲ +83.2% |
| 2023 | -1.95x | CA$-533.02K | CA$273.72K | ▲ +60.3% |
| 2022 | -4.91x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$302.42K | ▲ +55.4% |
| 2021 | -11.01x | CA$-1.35 Million | CA$122.62K | ▼ -137.4% |
| 2020 | -4.64x | CA$-779.47K | CA$168.07K | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2019 | -5.91x | CA$-799.82K | CA$135.42K | ▼ -78784.7% |
| 2018 | 0.01x | CA$5.57K | CA$742.30K | ▲ +167.9% |
| 2017 | -0.01x | CA$-6.42K | CA$581.13K | ▲ +97.6% |
| 2016 | -0.46x | CA$-180.67K | CA$390.13K | ▲ +97.0% |
| 2015 | -15.19x | CA$-938.10K | CA$61.75K | ▼ -365460.2% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | CA$-5.00K | CA$1.20 Million | ▼ -658.4% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | CA$-527.00 | CA$961.69K | ▲ +99.5% |
| 2012 | -0.11x | CA$-92.42K | CA$841.91K | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2011 | -0.81x | CA$-484.77K | CA$598.67K | ▼ -183.3% |
| 2010 | -0.29x | CA$-133.66K | CA$467.67K | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2009 | -0.37x | CA$-274.30K | CA$745.23K | ▲ +70.8% |
| 2008 | -1.26x | CA$-534.47K | CA$424.13K | ▲ +67.8% |
| 2007 | -3.91x | CA$-1.09 Million | CA$277.68K | ▼ -70.7% |
| 2006 | -2.29x | CA$-747.01K | CA$325.90K | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2005 | -3.07x | CA$-967.86K | CA$314.89K | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2004 | -2.44x | CA$-1.36 Million | CA$556.87K | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2003 | -1.66x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$649.64K | ▼ -105.5% |
| 2002 | -0.81x | CA$-919.00K | CA$1.14 Million | ▲ +68.9% |
| 2001 | -2.60x | CA$-2.71 Million | CA$1.04 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2000 | -2.37x | CA$-1.91 Million | CA$804.67K | ▼ -24.7% |
| 1999 | -1.90x | CA$-1.31 Million | CA$690.45K | ▼ -72.7% |
| 1998 | -1.10x | CA$-714.89K | CA$649.90K | ▼ -23.7% |
| 1997 | -0.89x | CA$-559.05K | CA$628.93K | — |