Oculus VisionTech Inc (OVT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Oculus VisionTech Inc (OVT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$734.00 could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$829.23K) in one year. See Oculus VisionTech Inc leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Oculus VisionTech Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Oculus VisionTech Inc across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Oculus VisionTech Inc (OVT) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Oculus VisionTech Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Oculus VisionTech Inc. Check OVT cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | CA$6.87K | CA$769.98K | ▲ +102.7% |
| 2024 | -0.33x | CA$-146.54K | CA$449.01K | ▲ +83.2% |
| 2023 | -1.95x | CA$-533.02K | CA$273.72K | ▲ +60.3% |
| 2022 | -4.91x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$302.42K | ▲ +55.4% |
| 2021 | -11.01x | CA$-1.35 Million | CA$122.62K | ▼ -137.4% |
| 2020 | -4.64x | CA$-779.47K | CA$168.07K | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2019 | -5.91x | CA$-799.82K | CA$135.42K | ▼ -78784.7% |
| 2018 | 0.01x | CA$5.57K | CA$742.30K | ▲ +167.9% |
| 2017 | -0.01x | CA$-6.42K | CA$581.13K | ▲ +97.6% |
| 2016 | -0.46x | CA$-180.67K | CA$390.13K | ▲ +97.0% |
| 2015 | -15.19x | CA$-938.10K | CA$61.75K | ▼ -365460.2% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | CA$-5.00K | CA$1.20 Million | ▼ -658.4% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | CA$-527.00 | CA$961.69K | ▲ +99.5% |
| 2012 | -0.11x | CA$-92.42K | CA$841.91K | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2011 | -0.81x | CA$-484.77K | CA$598.67K | ▼ -183.3% |
| 2010 | -0.29x | CA$-133.66K | CA$467.67K | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2009 | -0.37x | CA$-274.30K | CA$745.23K | ▲ +70.8% |
| 2008 | -1.26x | CA$-534.47K | CA$424.13K | ▲ +67.8% |
| 2007 | -3.91x | CA$-1.09 Million | CA$277.68K | ▼ -70.7% |
| 2006 | -2.29x | CA$-747.01K | CA$325.90K | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2005 | -3.07x | CA$-967.86K | CA$314.89K | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2004 | -2.44x | CA$-1.36 Million | CA$556.87K | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2003 | -1.66x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$649.64K | ▼ -105.5% |
| 2002 | -0.81x | CA$-919.00K | CA$1.14 Million | ▲ +68.9% |
| 2001 | -2.60x | CA$-2.71 Million | CA$1.04 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2000 | -2.37x | CA$-1.91 Million | CA$804.67K | ▼ -24.7% |
| 1999 | -1.90x | CA$-1.31 Million | CA$690.45K | ▼ -72.7% |
| 1998 | -1.10x | CA$-714.89K | CA$649.90K | ▼ -23.7% |
| 1997 | -0.89x | CA$-559.05K | CA$628.93K | — |