Oculus VisionTech Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Oculus VisionTech Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Oculus VisionTech Inc (OVT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$734.00 could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$829.23K) in one year. Check OVT cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Oculus VisionTech Inc (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Oculus VisionTech Inc from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Oculus VisionTech Inc across 29 annual periods. Check OVT capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Oculus VisionTech Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Oculus VisionTech Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Oculus VisionTech Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see OVT cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | CA$6.87K | CA$769.98K | ▲ +102.7% |
| 2024 | -0.33x | CA$-146.54K | CA$449.01K | ▲ +83.2% |
| 2023 | -1.95x | CA$-533.02K | CA$273.72K | ▲ +60.3% |
| 2022 | -4.91x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$302.42K | ▲ +55.4% |
| 2021 | -11.01x | CA$-1.35 Million | CA$122.62K | ▼ -137.4% |
| 2020 | -4.64x | CA$-779.47K | CA$168.07K | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2019 | -5.91x | CA$-799.82K | CA$135.42K | ▼ -78784.7% |
| 2018 | 0.01x | CA$5.57K | CA$742.30K | ▲ +167.9% |
| 2017 | -0.01x | CA$-6.42K | CA$581.13K | ▲ +97.6% |
| 2016 | -0.46x | CA$-180.67K | CA$390.13K | ▲ +97.0% |
| 2015 | -15.19x | CA$-938.10K | CA$61.75K | ▼ -365460.2% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | CA$-5.00K | CA$1.20 Million | ▼ -658.4% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | CA$-527.00 | CA$961.69K | ▲ +99.5% |
| 2012 | -0.11x | CA$-92.42K | CA$841.91K | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2011 | -0.81x | CA$-484.77K | CA$598.67K | ▼ -183.3% |
| 2010 | -0.29x | CA$-133.66K | CA$467.67K | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2009 | -0.37x | CA$-274.30K | CA$745.23K | ▲ +70.8% |
| 2008 | -1.26x | CA$-534.47K | CA$424.13K | ▲ +67.8% |
| 2007 | -3.91x | CA$-1.09 Million | CA$277.68K | ▼ -70.7% |
| 2006 | -2.29x | CA$-747.01K | CA$325.90K | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2005 | -3.07x | CA$-967.86K | CA$314.89K | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2004 | -2.44x | CA$-1.36 Million | CA$556.87K | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2003 | -1.66x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$649.64K | ▼ -105.5% |
| 2002 | -0.81x | CA$-919.00K | CA$1.14 Million | ▲ +68.9% |
| 2001 | -2.60x | CA$-2.71 Million | CA$1.04 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2000 | -2.37x | CA$-1.91 Million | CA$804.67K | ▼ -24.7% |
| 1999 | -1.90x | CA$-1.31 Million | CA$690.45K | ▼ -72.7% |
| 1998 | -1.10x | CA$-714.89K | CA$649.90K | ▼ -23.7% |
| 1997 | -0.89x | CA$-559.05K | CA$628.93K | — |