Oculus VisionTech Inc (OVT) — Net Asset Quality Index
Oculus VisionTech Inc (OVT) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -2211.0% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$35.88K minus total liabilities of CA$829.23K yields net assets of CA$-793.35K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See Oculus VisionTech Inc liquidity coverage in days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Oculus VisionTech Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1997–2025)
This chart shows how Oculus VisionTech Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 29 annual periods from 1997 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at -2211.0%, representing net assets of CA$-793.35K against total assets of CA$35.88K CAD. Explore OVT cash generation efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Oculus VisionTech Inc (1997–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Oculus VisionTech Inc from 1997 to 2025, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see OVT stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2291.6% | CA$-737.79K | CA$32.20K | CA$769.98K | ▼ -1256.0 pp |
| 2024 | -1035.6% | CA$-409.47K | CA$39.54K | CA$449.01K | ▼ -986.8 pp |
| 2023 | -48.8% | CA$-89.77K | CA$183.96K | CA$273.72K | ▼ -106.7 pp |
| 2022 | 57.9% | CA$415.42K | CA$717.84K | CA$302.42K | ▼ -36.7 pp |
| 2021 | 94.5% | CA$2.12 Million | CA$2.25 Million | CA$122.62K | ▲ +28.4 pp |
| 2020 | 66.1% | CA$328.20K | CA$496.27K | CA$168.07K | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2019 | 64.7% | CA$248.30K | CA$383.72K | CA$135.42K | ▲ +10939.0 pp |
| 2018 | -10874.2% | CA$-735.53K | CA$6.76K | CA$742.30K | ▼ -8961.4 pp |
| 2017 | -1912.8% | CA$-552.25K | CA$28.87K | CA$581.13K | ▼ -1443.9 pp |
| 2016 | -468.9% | CA$-321.56K | CA$68.58K | CA$390.13K | ▼ -537.0 pp |
| 2015 | 68.1% | CA$131.68K | CA$193.44K | CA$61.75K | ▲ +6379.8 pp |
| 2014 | -6311.7% | CA$-1.18 Million | CA$18.77K | CA$1.20 Million | ▼ -3854.7 pp |
| 2013 | -2457.0% | CA$-924.08K | CA$37.61K | CA$961.69K | ▲ +4803.6 pp |
| 2012 | -7260.6% | CA$-830.47K | CA$11.44K | CA$841.91K | ▼ -6803.3 pp |
| 2011 | -457.3% | CA$-491.25K | CA$107.42K | CA$598.67K | ▲ +1771.8 pp |
| 2010 | -2229.1% | CA$-447.59K | CA$20.08K | CA$467.67K | ▼ -914.2 pp |
| 2009 | -1314.9% | CA$-692.56K | CA$52.67K | CA$745.23K | ▲ +12468.3 pp |
| 2008 | -13783.2% | CA$-421.08K | CA$3.06K | CA$424.13K | ▼ -13507.5 pp |
| 2007 | -275.7% | CA$-203.77K | CA$73.91K | CA$277.68K | ▲ +211.7 pp |
| 2006 | -487.4% | CA$-270.42K | CA$55.48K | CA$325.90K | ▼ -236.0 pp |
| 2005 | -251.4% | CA$-225.29K | CA$89.60K | CA$314.89K | ▲ +270.8 pp |
| 2004 | -522.2% | CA$-467.37K | CA$89.50K | CA$556.87K | ▼ -44.9 pp |
| 2003 | -477.3% | CA$-537.10K | CA$112.54K | CA$649.64K | ▼ -219.2 pp |
| 2002 | -258.1% | CA$-818.53K | CA$317.14K | CA$1.14 Million | ▼ -282.9 pp |
| 2001 | 24.8% | CA$342.28K | CA$1.38 Million | CA$1.04 Million | ▼ -6.0 pp |
| 2000 | 30.8% | CA$358.28K | CA$1.16 Million | CA$804.67K | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 1999 | 28.6% | CA$276.18K | CA$966.63K | CA$690.45K | ▲ +71.4 pp |
| 1998 | -42.9% | CA$-194.97K | CA$454.93K | CA$649.90K | ▼ -14.3 pp |
| 1997 | -28.6% | CA$-139.76K | CA$489.17K | CA$628.93K | — |