Oculus VisionTech Inc (OVT) — Net Asset Quality Index
Oculus VisionTech Inc (OVT) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -2291.6% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$32.20K minus total liabilities of CA$769.98K yields net assets of CA$-737.79K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check OVT cash and liquid asset ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Oculus VisionTech Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1997–2025)
This chart shows how Oculus VisionTech Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 29 annual periods from 1997 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at -2291.6%, representing net assets of CA$-737.79K against total assets of CA$32.20K CAD. See working capital to net assets of Oculus VisionTech Inc to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Oculus VisionTech Inc (1997–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Oculus VisionTech Inc from 1997 to 2025, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see how much is Oculus VisionTech Inc worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2291.6% | CA$-737.79K | CA$32.20K | CA$769.98K | ▼ -1256.0 pp |
| 2024 | -1035.6% | CA$-409.47K | CA$39.54K | CA$449.01K | ▼ -986.8 pp |
| 2023 | -48.8% | CA$-89.77K | CA$183.96K | CA$273.72K | ▼ -106.7 pp |
| 2022 | 57.9% | CA$415.42K | CA$717.84K | CA$302.42K | ▼ -36.7 pp |
| 2021 | 94.5% | CA$2.12 Million | CA$2.25 Million | CA$122.62K | ▲ +28.4 pp |
| 2020 | 66.1% | CA$328.20K | CA$496.27K | CA$168.07K | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2019 | 64.7% | CA$248.30K | CA$383.72K | CA$135.42K | ▲ +10939.0 pp |
| 2018 | -10874.2% | CA$-735.53K | CA$6.76K | CA$742.30K | ▼ -8961.4 pp |
| 2017 | -1912.8% | CA$-552.25K | CA$28.87K | CA$581.13K | ▼ -1443.9 pp |
| 2016 | -468.9% | CA$-321.56K | CA$68.58K | CA$390.13K | ▼ -537.0 pp |
| 2015 | 68.1% | CA$131.68K | CA$193.44K | CA$61.75K | ▲ +6379.8 pp |
| 2014 | -6311.7% | CA$-1.18 Million | CA$18.77K | CA$1.20 Million | ▼ -3854.7 pp |
| 2013 | -2457.0% | CA$-924.08K | CA$37.61K | CA$961.69K | ▲ +4803.6 pp |
| 2012 | -7260.6% | CA$-830.47K | CA$11.44K | CA$841.91K | ▼ -6803.3 pp |
| 2011 | -457.3% | CA$-491.25K | CA$107.42K | CA$598.67K | ▲ +1771.8 pp |
| 2010 | -2229.1% | CA$-447.59K | CA$20.08K | CA$467.67K | ▼ -914.2 pp |
| 2009 | -1314.9% | CA$-692.56K | CA$52.67K | CA$745.23K | ▲ +12468.3 pp |
| 2008 | -13783.2% | CA$-421.08K | CA$3.06K | CA$424.13K | ▼ -13507.5 pp |
| 2007 | -275.7% | CA$-203.77K | CA$73.91K | CA$277.68K | ▲ +211.7 pp |
| 2006 | -487.4% | CA$-270.42K | CA$55.48K | CA$325.90K | ▼ -236.0 pp |
| 2005 | -251.4% | CA$-225.29K | CA$89.60K | CA$314.89K | ▲ +270.8 pp |
| 2004 | -522.2% | CA$-467.37K | CA$89.50K | CA$556.87K | ▼ -44.9 pp |
| 2003 | -477.3% | CA$-537.10K | CA$112.54K | CA$649.64K | ▼ -219.2 pp |
| 2002 | -258.1% | CA$-818.53K | CA$317.14K | CA$1.14 Million | ▼ -282.9 pp |
| 2001 | 24.8% | CA$342.28K | CA$1.38 Million | CA$1.04 Million | ▼ -6.0 pp |
| 2000 | 30.8% | CA$358.28K | CA$1.16 Million | CA$804.67K | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 1999 | 28.6% | CA$276.18K | CA$966.63K | CA$690.45K | ▲ +71.4 pp |
| 1998 | -42.9% | CA$-194.97K | CA$454.93K | CA$649.90K | ▼ -14.3 pp |
| 1997 | -28.6% | CA$-139.76K | CA$489.17K | CA$628.93K | — |