Oculus VisionTech Inc Net Asset Quality Index
Oculus VisionTech Inc net asset quality index. Oculus VisionTech Inc (OVT) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -2211.0% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$35.88K minus total liabilities of CA$829.23K yields net assets of CA$-793.35K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See Oculus VisionTech Inc (OVT) shareholders funds for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of Oculus VisionTech Inc (1997–2025)
Net asset quality index of Oculus VisionTech Inc from 1997 to 2025. This chart shows how Oculus VisionTech Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 29 annual periods from 1997 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at -2211.0%, representing net assets of CA$-793.35K against total assets of CA$35.88K CAD. Check how strategically is Oculus VisionTech Inc's equity deployed to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Oculus VisionTech Inc Net Asset Quality Index by Year (1997–2025)
Oculus VisionTech Inc net asset quality index by year from 1997 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Oculus VisionTech Inc from 1997 to 2025, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see OVT company net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2291.6% | CA$-737.79K | CA$32.20K | CA$769.98K | ▼ -1256.0 pp |
| 2024 | -1035.6% | CA$-409.47K | CA$39.54K | CA$449.01K | ▼ -986.8 pp |
| 2023 | -48.8% | CA$-89.77K | CA$183.96K | CA$273.72K | ▼ -106.7 pp |
| 2022 | 57.9% | CA$415.42K | CA$717.84K | CA$302.42K | ▼ -36.7 pp |
| 2021 | 94.5% | CA$2.12 Million | CA$2.25 Million | CA$122.62K | ▲ +28.4 pp |
| 2020 | 66.1% | CA$328.20K | CA$496.27K | CA$168.07K | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2019 | 64.7% | CA$248.30K | CA$383.72K | CA$135.42K | ▲ +10939.0 pp |
| 2018 | -10874.2% | CA$-735.53K | CA$6.76K | CA$742.30K | ▼ -8961.4 pp |
| 2017 | -1912.8% | CA$-552.25K | CA$28.87K | CA$581.13K | ▼ -1443.9 pp |
| 2016 | -468.9% | CA$-321.56K | CA$68.58K | CA$390.13K | ▼ -537.0 pp |
| 2015 | 68.1% | CA$131.68K | CA$193.44K | CA$61.75K | ▲ +6379.8 pp |
| 2014 | -6311.7% | CA$-1.18 Million | CA$18.77K | CA$1.20 Million | ▼ -3854.7 pp |
| 2013 | -2457.0% | CA$-924.08K | CA$37.61K | CA$961.69K | ▲ +4803.6 pp |
| 2012 | -7260.6% | CA$-830.47K | CA$11.44K | CA$841.91K | ▼ -6803.3 pp |
| 2011 | -457.3% | CA$-491.25K | CA$107.42K | CA$598.67K | ▲ +1771.8 pp |
| 2010 | -2229.1% | CA$-447.59K | CA$20.08K | CA$467.67K | ▼ -914.2 pp |
| 2009 | -1314.9% | CA$-692.56K | CA$52.67K | CA$745.23K | ▲ +12468.3 pp |
| 2008 | -13783.2% | CA$-421.08K | CA$3.06K | CA$424.13K | ▼ -13507.5 pp |
| 2007 | -275.7% | CA$-203.77K | CA$73.91K | CA$277.68K | ▲ +211.7 pp |
| 2006 | -487.4% | CA$-270.42K | CA$55.48K | CA$325.90K | ▼ -236.0 pp |
| 2005 | -251.4% | CA$-225.29K | CA$89.60K | CA$314.89K | ▲ +270.8 pp |
| 2004 | -522.2% | CA$-467.37K | CA$89.50K | CA$556.87K | ▼ -44.9 pp |
| 2003 | -477.3% | CA$-537.10K | CA$112.54K | CA$649.64K | ▼ -219.2 pp |
| 2002 | -258.1% | CA$-818.53K | CA$317.14K | CA$1.14 Million | ▼ -282.9 pp |
| 2001 | 24.8% | CA$342.28K | CA$1.38 Million | CA$1.04 Million | ▼ -6.0 pp |
| 2000 | 30.8% | CA$358.28K | CA$1.16 Million | CA$804.67K | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 1999 | 28.6% | CA$276.18K | CA$966.63K | CA$690.45K | ▲ +71.4 pp |
| 1998 | -42.9% | CA$-194.97K | CA$454.93K | CA$649.90K | ▼ -14.3 pp |
| 1997 | -28.6% | CA$-139.76K | CA$489.17K | CA$628.93K | — |